Channel
@CapitulationCalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
62subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001900938971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CapitulationCalls |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 26 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CapitulationCalls |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 62 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 63 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 64 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 64 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
16 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9 | 56.3% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2023 to 17 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Updated view on the eur/usd chart. The chart broke local highs invalidating old levels to watch for. Prices did end up making lower lows and we are back up at local resistance, as well as our macro resistance line, marked with the dotted red line. I'll be looking for a rejection here. 1.064 was invalidated as our trend reversal level with the break of highs. Basically the same set up, local highs at 1.128 invali…
👍1
The DXY rejected before filling the gap at 106. Currently trading at 104. Money is cycling back into traditional markets/ people are chasing profits away from the crypto space. That money will cycle back back into cryptos in my opinion it's just a matter of where you want to start scaling in. If the Adam and eve top pattern is valid we should be looking for a 33.8k target for lows if 35.2k doesn't hold as support…
🔥2
Another chart I'll be tracking is the us02y/us10y. For comparison bitcoins top formation in 2021. On the chart I've marked 1% as that is the inversion point, markets can and mostly likely will continue to push higher until "un-inversion" has happened. Historically traditional markets bottom after the un-inversion happens. Just a rough sketch for now, will watch the chart more once we get closer to the start of 20…
🔥2
The chart that gave me the epiphany. Bitcoin on the monthly timeframe. The fractal starts from highs in 2021 up to current prices. Fractals are low teir for trading, you can look at them, but they can deviate anytime they want, this is just one I'll be keeping my eyes on as it validates my original stance.
Right view wrong count? Going off of the premise that the FTX dump being our 5th wave move, our move from 15-32k for wave A, 25k retest for wave B. If valid we are currently in wave C aiming at the low 50k range. ~25k lows + 26k = 51-52k target for the end of wave C which would be the the end of our macro wave B move. With us cracking 33k it invalidated my view of this being wave 4, but it doesn't invalidate the …
Tracking this distribution pattern on ETH. Tagging the "we heard you like distribution" chart for comparison. The Eth futures chart has tagged 2,154$ 4 more dollars and I won't be looking for new lows out of eth. I have a feeling we are going to run into the same situation we had with Bitcoin and test my bear thesis towards the end of 2024 for ETH. If valid we "should" see: >2,158$ broken relatively soon >chop at…
🏆1
ETH is coming up on its technical bear market invalidation at 2,158$ Currently testing 2,147 as resistance. New gap creations at 1.6k and 1.85k.
Not as well put together as the accumulation pattern for the macro, but trends tend to degrade in structure the further you go down in time frames. We could be starting phase E, for context phase E for accumulation is the same thing as UTAD in distribution. Nothing confirmed yet, we could reject lateral resistance here and still head lower for another retest before the breakout, but this is what I'll be watching. …
What we have here is the same fractal broken into two parts, shorter timing on the latter market phase so I needed to pull them apart to give you a better view. Take what you will from this, I just wanted to mention it as I thought it contrasted well as to how it could end up looking on the macro. This tells you less information about what price targets to enter/ exit from and more to show general market structure …
👏1
Was poking around the lower time frames on Bitcoin, the chart isn't necessarily important other than to show that markets repeat themselves over and over going through cycles of accumulation and distribution repetitively.
While looking over the ETH/BTC chart we may be setting up a longer term distribution pattern once we finish this breakdown. So more or less, if valid, you're going to want to start hedging away from BTC in the later part of 2024 as liquidity starts to cycle back into ETH. Bitcoin over performs at the beginning of the cycle to draw in new liquidity, after that point there is little to no reason to hold Bitcoin other…
🏆1
Updated view for the ETH/BTC chart. The falling wedge failed to breakout which goes to validate the distribution pattern. This isn't to say that eth won't grow in value and more to say that you're better off holding Bitcoin compared to ETH. We probably see chop here for months before the breakdown happens.
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CapitulationCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Capitulation Calls” (@CapitulationCalls), 62 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CapitulationCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.