Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Capitalist.net

@Capitalist_net

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,203subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001101355970
TypeChannel
Username@Capitalist_net
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 January 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Capitalist_net

Growth

6,2036,2156,2096 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,212 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,208 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,203 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,201–6,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:146,203-5
9 Aug 2026, 13:016,208-4
6 Aug 2026, 14:276,212-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:216,215no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:286,215first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.12%
avg views ÷ 6,203 subscribers
Avg views / post
441
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held11 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total4,855
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2836.8%
👍1519.7%
🔥1114.5%
👌911.8%
😎79.21%
🙏33.95%
🌚22.63%
🆒11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC272 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Everything you need to know about payments, condensed into 8 slides. Use this knowledge responsibly 💎 Enough wisdom for today. Explore payment solutions with Capitalist 🗣️

😎53👍3👌2🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC353 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The Capitalist team is flying to Jakarta — we'll be at Indonesia Blockchain Week 2026 on August 12–13 at the Jakarta International Convention Center (JICC), Southeast Asia's largest Web3 summit. 📣 If you're around, come say hi! We're happy to talk about payments, card infrastructure, White Label and API solutions, fintech and Web3 trends — or anything else on your mind. Let's swap contacts and find ways to work toge

6👍4🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC523 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A three-legged frog, 12 grapes at midnight or a pig trying to enter your home — depending on where you are, any of these could mean that money is on its way 💵 We’ve collected some of the most curious wealth symbols and traditions from around the world. Take a look and tell us: do you have a money ritual of your own? For the more practical side of money, explore Capitalist.net

5👍2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC404 viewsread 10 August 2026

We’re starting ❗️❗️❗️ Leave your questions for Jon in the comments under the AMA post above. He’ll be answering them during the session. ➡️

6 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC404 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

What would you ask Capitalist’s Regional Growth Director? 🔥 Today at 3:00 pm (GMT+3), Jon Acoca will join us for an AMA session. Payments, business growth, partnerships, fintech, or the challenges your team is facing — prepare your questions and join the conversation. We’ll open the discussion under this post when the session begins. See you soon! 🚀

6🔥4👍2😎2

5 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC341 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌎 No revolutions in digital finance this week — and honestly, the calmer, the better, right? Still, there were a few updates worth keeping on your radar. ⏩ 1. Mastercard completes its acquisition of BVNK On August 3, Mastercard completed its acquisition of BVNK, a provider of infrastructure connecting traditional and digital currencies. BVNK supports cross-border business payments, remittances, payouts, settlement

🙏32👌2🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC443 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Payment delays during peak periods don’t always mean something’s wrong ⏳ In these cards, we break down what to expect from card payouts, bank wires, and crypto transfers — and how to plan ahead when processing times get longer. Swipe through for a quick checklist to keep in mind during high-traffic periods ⬆️ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👉capitalist.net 😀 IG 😀 IN ⛔️ YT 🌐 FB 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠

3👌3👍2🌚1

3 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC495 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌍 Cross-border payments are emerging as stablecoins’ clearest real-world use case The UK Financial Conduct Authority has published the findings of its Stablecoin Sprint. Participants from banking, fintech and crypto identified international transfers as the strongest near-term opportunity, especially in emerging markets with limited access to US dollars. Cross-border payments can still involve multiple intermediari

3👌2👍2🌚1

31 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC≈560 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

CapCard US/UK payment update 📣 The issuing bank has updated MCC coverage for CapCard cards with US and UK BINs that do not support Apple Pay or Google Pay. Some payments for software subscriptions, AI services, developer tools, and games may now be declined. Payments for advertising platforms and educational content remain available as before. If you need to pay for AI tools or entertainment, alternative CapCard B

31 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC≈521 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

CapCard — an easy way to treat yourself to what you really want 💚 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👉capitalist.net 😀 IG 😀 IN ⛔️ YT 🌐 FB 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠

30 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC≈539 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Your payment setup is part of your tech stack 💵 Multiple cards and BINs, crypto funding, instant team transfers, and bulk payouts help keep performance teams running without unnecessary downtime. Jon Acoca, Regional Growth Director at Capitalist, explains why stronger payment rails mean a stronger operation➡️ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👉capitalist.net 😀 IG 😀 IN ⛔️ YT 🌐 FB 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Capitalist_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 193,778 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Capitalist.net” (@Capitalist_net), 6,203 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Capitalist_net.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.