Channel
@CambioClimaticoInfoAlternativa
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,788subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001461031166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CambioClimaticoInfoAlternativa |
| Created | 12 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CambioClimaticoInfoAlternativa |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @cienclim/101331 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC | @CambioClimaticoInfoAlternativa/6548 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC | 1.00 | 61 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cienclim | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 53 minutes | @cienclim (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @cienclim. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 2,788 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 2,786 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 2,785 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 2,785 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,937 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 AÑOS DEL FENÓMENO DEL NIÑO MÁS BRUTAL DE LA HISTORIA Que no te cuenten camelos sobre el efecto del cambio climático sobre El Niño. El fenómeno de El Niño es recurrente y nada tiene que ver con el cambio climático. Cada 2-5 años tiene lugar un Niño, cuando los vientos alisios se debilitan y el Pacífico Ecuatorial se calienta, alterando el régimen de precipitaciones en los trópicos, provocando sequías, incendios e…
EL PÚBLICO ESTÁ CANSADO DEL ALARMISMO CLIMÁTICO El periodismo climático se reduce, como muestra este reciente artículo de la Fundación Nieman para el Periodismo, de Harvard. La CBS ha perdido toda su sección dedicada al clima, el Washington Post ha recortado el 74 % de su equipo especializado en el clima y la NPR ha despedido al editor de su sección sobre el clima. El análisis de fin de año de 2025 del Observatorio …
Hace 77 años, el Rin estaba tan seco que los barcos quedaban encallados en el lecho del río. Sin embargo, en aquel momento, nadie habló de una "catástrofe climática". Hoy en día, en cambio, casi cualquier período de sequía se utiliza inmediatamente como prueba del cambio climático antropogénico. Una película del Archivo Federal documenta el verano extremo de 1949: el Rin transportaba tan poca agua que se exponían a…
LAS ESTADÍSTICAS DEL CORAL EXPONEN UNA VERDAD INCONVENIENTE La Gran Barrera de Coral lleva seis años consecutivos con cantidades de coral que han batido o igualado récords. Según los últimos datos del Instituto Australiano de Ciencias Marinas, la cantidad de coral en los últimos seis años es mayor que la de cualquiera de los 35 años anteriores. Una vez más, esto demuestra que lo que se le ha dicho al mundo sobre la …
LA INDIA RENUNCIA A ORGANIZAR LA CONFERENCIA CLIMÁTICA En un nuevo golpe a la farsa climática que se lleva representando más de 30 años, la India ha anunciado que retira su candidatura a organizar la conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre el cambio climático en 2028, la que será la COP33 (Conferencia de las Partes). El anuncio ha pasado desapercibido en los principales medios de comunicación, pero ha causado hond…
LAS POLÍTICAS VERDES ALIMENTAN LOS INCENDIOS EN EUROPA Las zonas quemadas son, desproporcionadamente, espacios naturales protegidos Editorial del Wall Street Journal (extracto): Los incendios están causando estragos en Francia y España. Pero no sería una tragedia relacionada con la meteorología si alguien no culpase al cambio climático. La trágica ironía es que las políticas medioambientales de Europa están haciend…
El ETNA se ha cargado en pocos días, los planes de reducir el CO2 de Europa de 10 años. Pero tu coche sigue contaminado.
NO PODEMOS DETENER EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO, ASÍ QUE DISFRUTÉMOSLO Finalmente, un editor de periódico mayoritario en Gran Bretaña lo entiende. Alistair Heath, editor del Sunday Telegraph lo deja claro en su editorial: «Hemos perdido la guerra contra el cambio climático. Olvidémonos del cero neto». «El cambio climático es real, pero Gran Bretaña no puede hacer prácticamente nada al respecto. La guerra contra el calentami…
EN TODA LA FRENTE DE LOS ESPAÑOLES ¿Se acuerdan que decían algunos que para operar en terrenos afectados por los incendios, se debían esperar 30 años? ¿Recuerdan también que había una excepción? Pues eso, se han acogido a la excepción.
LA CIENCIA ES "NEGACIONISTA", LA PROPAGANDA "CREACIONISTA" Muchos científicos negamos que el cambio climático se deba fundamentalmente a nuestras emisiones porque es algo que se afirma sin pruebas con objeto de defender oscuros intereses económicos y políticos, mientras la ciencia que se publica en las revistas científicas muestra algo completamente distinto de lo que se propaga en periódicos y televisión. Un ejemp…
NO TENEMOS "EMERGENCIA CLIMÁTICA", TENEMOS "EMERGENCIA POLÍTICA" Desde hace un par de años, España se está viendo afectada por graves catástrofes medioambientales. En concreto, la DANA de Valencia de 2024 y los graves incendios de 2025 y 2026. La respuesta que se da a los ciudadanos es que «el cambio climático está intensificando los eventos extremos más destructivos de los últimos años en España». La solución que s…
‼️Tranquilos estas proximas semanas Recordar... este agosto va haber una Energia tremendamente fuerte, y hay que EVITAR dejar arrastrarse por ella, y hacer tonterias. Va a ser dificil, pero hay que intentar estar positivos y con buena vibracion para no ser arrastrados por esta " tormenta cosmica" que ha empezado hace 10 dias y durara mas de un mes despues del Eclipse total NO es esoterismo Es pura astrofisica .…
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CambioClimaticoInfoAlternativa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 155,656 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cambio Climatico” (@CambioClimaticoInfoAlternativa), 2,788 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CambioClimaticoInfoAlternativa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.