May 23, 2023 at 01:51PM @EliotHiggins On the far right in more ways than one then https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660991832929566720

Channel
CalibreObscura Backup
@CalibreObscuraTweets
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001309445756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CalibreObscuraTweets |
| Description | @CalibreObscura backup from Twitter, unofficial |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CalibreObscuraTweets |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 45 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 45 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈24,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
May 22, 2023 at 09:11PM Greatly enjoying the people having mental breakdowns over the RVC/LFR using an M1224 in Belgorod as if it's some escalation, almost as funny as those getting ever so worked up over losing one https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660740148261265408
May 22, 2023 at 08:46PM @Asw3dF XD75 still going strong eh https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660733940477440000
May 22, 2023 at 08:07PM @planefag If you're about to launch a multi front offensive why not use a few guys, a tank and a few MRAP to divert like 10 VKS/FSB Helis, thousands of men etc? https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660724137440976896
May 22, 2023 at 04:17PM @WarMonitors Fake news. The MRAP has paint on it. https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660666099891859456
May 22, 2023 at 03:17PM @mikes_neni_pan Actually can work quite well against RPG-7 if you know how their fuzes work https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660651190374244356
May 22, 2023 at 02:28PM @Anthrax_In_UK They weren't dropping flares and flying nap of the earth over Russia like this much https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660638754137075716
May 22, 2023 at 01:55PM Russian helicopters flying low and dropping flares to avoid Ukrainian SAMs whilst *over Russia* is certainly interesting https://t.co/qNVNblbmDX https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660630376002338819
May 22, 2023 at 12:47PM @DefMon3 Didn't they want goida? https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660613267293650946
May 22, 2023 at 11:18AM Russia now operates the T-80BV "Adra", we can all see how the Syrian lessons were learned™️ https://t.co/p9kkFU8NGj https://t.co/NN5fUv42A2 https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660591037067284481
May 22, 2023 at 07:26AM @Ayei_Eloheichem Actually, latter may be deleted. https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660532543085588480
May 22, 2023 at 07:25AM @Ayei_Eloheichem Ukrainian Air Force and Fighterbomber both confimed https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1660532201304326151
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CalibreObscuraTweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 11
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 11
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CalibreObscuraTweets named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…web|url=https://t.me/CalibreObscuraTweets/17095|title=CalibreObscura Backup|website=[[Telegram (software)|Telegram]]}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/…”
read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CalibreObscura Backup” (@CalibreObscuraTweets), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CalibreObscuraTweets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.