Channel
@CaketoolsAnn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,237subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001478860109 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CaketoolsAnn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CaketoolsAnn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 2,237 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 2,239 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 2,241 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 2,241 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Road to Recovery The world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, with new projects popping up all the time. The Binance Smart Chain (BSC) has become a popular platform for DeFi projects due to its low transaction fees and fast confirmation times. However, with so many projects to choose from, it can be difficult to know which ones to invest in. That's where the BSC DeFi Charting Hub comes in. Our …
Signed King Dave
Hello Dear Community The “Unknown error” that was associated with Wallet connect experienced by some users have been fixed, the vesting portal is working fine on metamask and wallet connect, work is been done on the stake-pad and cakepad stay tuned for more update
Signed King Dave
Vestingportal.caketools.io Investors can now claim their tokens daily
Signed King Dave
https://twitter.com/CaKe_Tools/status/1538121299846959104?t=_ECtUV_0yRoR4JQobozHAA&s=09
Signed Kehinde
Caketools Vesting Portal Now Live
Signed King Dave
https://twitter.com/CaKe_Tools/status/1536673038644674561?t=rNlrzx_wPyK3s4hwDP82HA&s=19
Signed Kehinde
Please engage on the above tweet do your part for the project we are all vested on, there is a rebranding going on we are working and will start updating the community.. in a few days we will be releasing the first of many steps and updates on the way forward. We plead that you remain calm and offer all necessary support.
Signed King Dave
Go mention caketools to gate on this trend
Signed King Dave
https://twitter.com/gate_io/status/1534350812704649216?s=21&t=fmugO-2COHzgn5H4Pl7RIA Engage guys let’s have more visibility on this trend
Signed King Dave
Please our DMs are open to suggestions and collaborations....we are a few months to our product launch and we would go big with it....lots of collaborations and partnerships will unravel in coming weeks and months, yours might be the game changer let’s do more on self awareness
Signed King Dave
As a cryptocurrency trader, what would you rather do in a crypto bear market?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Kehinde
https://twitter.com/CaKe_Tools/status/1511990789177491457?t=wK2xZy6VrIUjY_ix2k2xDQ&s=09
Signed Kehinde
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CaketoolsAnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
As a cryptocurrency trader, what would you rather do in a crypto bear market?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2022 to 8 April 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,290,231 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CakeTools Announcement” (@CaketoolsAnn), 2,237 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CaketoolsAnn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.