3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,564–4,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:27
4,565
+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:03
4,564
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:56
4,564
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
40s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31
73.8%
👍
6
14.3%
🥰
5
11.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 12 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Рецепт лимонно-маковых тарталеток🥰Маковый слой дает просто супер текстуру!
рубрика - t.me/tortdeko
автор - @orlova_na_kuhne
Маковый слой:
Мак 100
Вода 150
Масло сливочное 40 г
Шоколад белый 80 г
Мак залить водой и уварить на среднем огне до полного испарения воды.
Шоколад растопить, добавить к нему мягкое сливочное масло, перемешать, добавить мак (мак должен быть без воды!).
Заполнить тарталетки, убрать в холодильник…
🍰РЕЦЕПТ ТОРТА 🍰Кофе - фундук - шоколад ☕️🌰🍫
рубрика - t.me/tortdeko
автор - @cakeberry_33
В составе кофейный бисквит, фундучный дакуаз и два вида крема - шоколадно-кофейный и фундучный на основе творожного сыра и маскарпоне 😻
Рецепт рассчитан на торт диаметром 18 см.
РЕЦЕПТ В КАРУСЕЛИ (листайте фото) ➡️➡️➡️
Почему велюр трескается?
рубрика - t.me/tortdeko
автор - @novik_bakery
Шоколадный велюр — очень хрупкое покрытие, поэтому при работе с ним важно избегать ошибок, которые могут привести к трещинам💔
1. Слишком толстый слой велюра.
Следите за равномерностью покрытия.
2. Торт не отстоялся и продолжает давать усадку.
Не покрывайте торт сразу после сборки, дайте ему отстояться, иначе треснет скорее всего даже не сам велюр,…
ШОКОЛАДНЫЙ ФОНДАН🍫
рубрика - t.me/tortdeko
автор - @carriecakeee
Порция рассчитана на 2 формы диаметром 8 см
▫️Шоколад 54% - 65 г
▫️Сахар - 35 г
▫️Масло сливочное - 60 г
▫️Яйцо - 1 шт
▫️Мука - 13 г
1. Растопить шоколад с маслом в микроволновке или на водяной бане.
2. Взбить миксером яйцо с сахаром. Пару минут, чтобы появилась пенка и масса немного увеличилась.
3. Растопленный шоколад с маслом постепенно ввести в яичн…
Торт Рафаэлло🥥
рубрика - t.me/tortdeko
автор - @muff_sweets
Рецепт кокосового бисквита в предыдущем посте автора)
Крем с белым шоколадом и сливками:
Белый шоколад- 200гр
Сливки (1) - 200 гр (горячие) 33%
Сливки (2) - 300гр (холодные) 33%
Этот крем готовится заранее, до 4-8 часов до взбивания. Удобно сделать его вечером, а утром уже взбить миксером.
Нарезаем шоколад на мелкие кусочки.
Отправляем в миску или в глубокую…
❤10
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Cakedeco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Cakedeco named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@cakeberry_33 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@orlova_na_kuhne named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@muff_sweets named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рецепты, декор, фото тортов. Журнал ТортДеко, CakeDeco.ru” (@Cakedeco), 4,565 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cakedeco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.