Channel
@CYS2MCQ
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
804subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001920118281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CYS2MCQ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CYS2MCQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 804 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 802 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 10 | 66.7% | |
| ๐ค | 3 | 20.0% | |
| โค | 2 | 13.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2025 to 3 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ฐ ุงููุชููููููู ๐ธ ุงุณุฆููููุฉ ุงูู ุญุงุถููููููููุฑุฉ ุงูุฃูููู ู ุงูุซุงููููููููุฉ ๐ธ ุดุจูููููููุงุช ุญุงุณููููููููููุจ ๐ธ ุฏ.ุนุจุฏ ุงูุฑุญู ููููููู ุงูุตุจูููููููุฑู ๐ธูุธููููุฑู ๐ก ุงููุฌูุฉ ุงูุนูู ูุฉ ููุฃู ู ุงูุณูุจุฑุงูู CYS2 ๐ก
๐10โค2
Signed Ali_Sewar
Which protocol uses a periodic sharing mechanism?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
What does address aggregation achieve?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
What type of routing table updates itself automatically?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
A routing table in classless addressing must have at least four columns.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
The default route is used when no specific match is found in the routing table.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐ค1
Signed Ali_Sewar
The default route is used when no specific match is found in the routing table.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐ค2
Signed Ali_Sewar
In network-specific routing, the route is based on the host's IP address.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
The ARP protocol is used to resolve IP addresses to MAC addresses.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
Longest mask matching ensures the most specific route is selected.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
Static routing tables are updated automatically by the network.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
What is the key principle of hierarchical routing?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ali_Sewar
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CYS2MCQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What type of routing table updates itself automatically?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What does address aggregation achieve?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which protocol uses a periodic sharing mechanism?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In forwarding, a router modifies the packet's source address
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The default route is used when no specific match is found in the routing table.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The default route is used when no specific match is found in the routing table.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2025 to 3 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 1,051,934 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฐ CYS 2 MCQ ๐ฐโ (@CYS2MCQ), 804 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CYS2MCQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.