The user @wadewilsn failed to resolve the captcha. The "user" was kicked out.
Signed The Join Captcha Bot

Channel
@CSW_Cybersecurity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001193525344 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CSW_Cybersecurity |
| Description | http://t.me/CSW_Cybersecurity @CSW_Academic @CSW_Articles @CSW_interviewsVideos @CSW_Religion @CSW_Slack https://www.giac.org/certified-professional/craig-wright/107335?s=09 https://ramonquesada.com/english/telegrams-channels |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CSW_Cybersecurity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 13 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 13 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The user @wadewilsn failed to resolve the captcha. The "user" was kicked out.
Signed The Join Captcha Bot
https://eforensicsmag.com/dr-craig-wright/
Signed Ivan G
https://www.giac.org/certified-professional/craig-wright/107335?s=09
Signed Admon S y C
https://twitter.com/Dr_CSWright/status/1615665476692213761?s=20&t=Vuro0RWU5lFtiA4mMJeHvQ
Signed Ramon Quesada.
https://twitter.com/Dr_CSWright/status/1615383032718057472?t=xr5IyhN-NClBlwN7QXzOow&s=19
Signed Ramon Quesada.
Bitcoin es donde se cruzan esencialmente dos industrias al más alto nivel, (entre otras): la ciberseguridad y las finanzas, muy poca gente es capaz de conocer en profundidad ambas y el que te diga que es un experto, por favor que enseñé sus credenciales. https://t.me/CSW_Academic
Signed Ramon Quesada.
He first met Dr. Wright in 2006 while Yousuf was completing a Master of Information Systems Security course at Charles Sturt University. He noted that Dr. Wright was his classmate in one subject and his lecturer in another—something he found unusual at the time. He says he was also impressed at Wright’s depth of knowledge across various topics, and particularly that he had over 70 certifications in cybersecurity, pre…
Signed Ramon Quesada.
"I had been involved with SANS training and conferences since 1997. Between then and the time I dropped off doing courses in 2015, I had gained over thirty certifications. The courses included two master’s degrees [2]. The areas of study covered information security, programming, and much more. I took all three of the GSE hands-on exams [3]. I did so while studying for a master’s degree in law, a master’s degree in s…
Signed @RamonQuesada 🌷
"Dave and I worked with law enforcement and others for a long time. Dave took opiates, because his condition left him in constant pain. But more importantly, contacts of his told him about the impending takedown of Liberty Reserve eight weeks before it occurred. He was left with the problem of knowing that if he moved his funds, it would be tracked. Effectively, to do so would have ended his career." The myth of for…
Signed @RamonQuesada 🌷
Channel name was changed to «CSW. 310 Cybersecurity»
RE: Forensic/Cyber Crime Investigator From: "Craig Wright" <cwright () bdosyd com au> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 Hi Dave, To further add weight to the argument and as you seem to think I base comments on opinion, please read the following as an introduction. I can keep going if you wish? https://seclists.org/basics/2006/Feb/148
Signed @RamonQuesada 🌷
Deborah Kobza, CGEIT, JIEM Founder/President, International Association of Certified ISAOs (IACI) https://www.linkedin.com/in/deborah-kobza-cgeit-jiem-98b4a8/
Signed 1Janna ⚡️🔑
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CSW_Cybersecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,136,808 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CSW. 310 Cybersecurity” (@CSW_Cybersecurity), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CSW_Cybersecurity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.