Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CSAT COMPLETE

@CSAT_ConvertIAS

Not marked by Telegram, checked 13 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,552subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223403768
TypeChannel
Username@CSAT_ConvertIAS
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CSAT_ConvertIAS

Growth

3,5513,5523,551.512 Aug 2026, 13:16 — 3,551 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:45 — 3,552 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:1612 Aug 2026, 19:45
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,551–3,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:453,552+1
12 Aug 2026, 13:163,551first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 3,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
481
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total5,775
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC426 viewsread 12 August 2026

CSAT lIVE CLASS- Factors and Divisibility Joining link 🔗 - https://youtube.com/live/sJ2eqdhjR2U?feature=share

23 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC466 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

CSAT LIVE CLASS -From Basic to Advanced 💫 Joining link: https://youtube.com/live/aZDYGcYdtMQ?feature=share

21 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC579 viewsread 12 August 2026

This will be discussed in next session! 🔥 Very Interesting Topic - Will help you get Easy 10-15 Marks in CSAT! Do Not Miss the Session - Multiple Questions come from this Concept and Many Students Fail in i! https://www.convertias.com/subscription-details/csat_complete

21 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTCviews —

CSAT COMPLETE pinned «Is (a^3) + (b^3) = (c^3) possible, if a, b, and c are natural numbers?»

21 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC594 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Is (a^3) + (b^3) = (c^3) possible, if a, b, and c are natural numbers?

  1. (a) Possible61%
  2. (b) Not possible39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTCviews —

CSAT COMPLETE pinned «Today we have also discussed about a condition (a^3) + (b^3) = c^3, How many solutions are possible? In this everyone has the freedom to take a, b, and c as real number or integers. In the next session we will be discussing about this particular expression.…»

21 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC583 viewsread 12 August 2026

Today we have also discussed about a condition (a^3) + (b^3) = c^3, How many solutions are possible? In this everyone has the freedom to take a, b, and c as real number or integers. In the next session we will be discussing about this particular expression. Hint: make cases accordingly.

21 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC554 viewsread 12 August 2026

Today’s lecture. As we have discussed about the basics of numbers today in the next session we will be discussing about the prime numbers which is very important topic for UPSC. Please practice these questions and revise the topics.

21 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC473 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

How UPSC is putting limitations by using basics of numbers. Today in our lecture we will be discussing those aspects where UPSC use basic concept in data sufficiency question - making it difficult to moderate level.

20 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTCviews —

CSAT COMPLETE pinned «Hello everyone, tomorrow we are starting with our first introductory lecture of CSAT complete 1. Our focus is to analyse the trend of UPSC CSAT. 2. Why UPSC is becoming more tougher? 3. Why to start early? 4. Some basics concepts related to Numbers and UPSC…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CSAT_ConvertIAS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Is (a^3) + (b^3) = (c^3) possible, if a, b, and c are natural numbers?

  1. (a) Possible61%
  2. (b) Not possible39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTCAnonymous Quiz38 voters

Which of the following is correct?

  1. (a)5%
  2. (b)26%
  3. (c)61%
  4. (d)8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Target Sarkari Exams™
@Target_Sarkari_Exams · 137,017
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 13 August 2026
Unacademy OfficiaI ™© UPPSC BPSC HPSC
@Unacademyofficialss · 162,509
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CSAT COMPLETE” (@CSAT_ConvertIAS), 3,552 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CSAT_ConvertIAS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.