Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Wallet™

@CRYPTO_WALLETS_TM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

44,889subscribers

-462 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002065815692
TypeChannel
Username@CRYPTO_WALLETS_TM
DescriptionWhat you want to know about business❓ Every details about Business & Crypto Currency. Request and Learn How to make Money with $0 👇👇 Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/CRYPTO_WALLETS_TM Admin:📥 @Melvin_Zh48 ZK
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CRYPTO_WALLETS_TM

Growth

44,88945,35145,1207 August 2026 — 45,351 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,351 subscribers8 August 2026 — 45,288 subscribers9 August 2026 — 45,205 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45,142 subscribers11 August 2026 — 45,094 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,017 subscribers13 August 2026 — 44,973 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,889 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -462. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,820–45,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:3944,889-84
13 Aug 2026, 05:2944,973-44
12 Aug 2026, 06:3345,017-77
11 Aug 2026, 06:5345,094-48
10 Aug 2026, 10:0845,142-63
9 Aug 2026, 13:1145,205-83
8 Aug 2026, 11:1145,288-63
7 Aug 2026, 12:3045,351no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:1845,351first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.97%
avg views ÷ 44,889 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (7 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total6,668
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
309
Videos
16
Links
336

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

321 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍18557.6%
6720.9%
🔥4514.0%
👏123.74%
💯103.12%
👌10.312%
🥰10.312%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 321reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC394 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

💎 Bybit Sues North Korea and Lazarus for $1.5B Hack Bybit sued North Korea and hacker group Lazarus for stealing $1.5 billion in ETH. A US court froze some traced assets for Bybit. The 2025 hack was crypto’s largest, with funds converted mostly to BTC via THORChain. Bybit covered losses from reserves, avoiding collapse unlike many tier-2 exchanges. Since 2017, North Korean hackers stole about $6.75 billion in cryp

👍102👏1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC774 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

💰 Trump Media Sold Additional 2,628 BTC Trump Media sold another 2,628 BTC worth about $165 million. In September 2025, it bought 11,542 BTC at an average price of $118,522. About seven months ago, Trump Media began selling its bitcoin, offloading 7,281 BTC at an average of $74,855. It still holds 4,261 BTC, valued around $269 million, with total losses estimated at $555 million, per Lookonchain. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍9🔥31💯1

31 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈2,090 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Strategy reported an $8.32B unrealized loss on Bitcoin in Q2 2026. The company held 843,775 BTC, compared to a $14.05B unrealized gain in the same period last year. Michael Saylor signaled a flexible strategy: selling BTC when necessary instead of buying regardless of market conditions. Despite the loss, MSTR shares rose ~5%, indicating investor approval of disciplined capital management over aggressive buying.

👍93👏1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,220 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ UN: Southeast Asia Scam Networks Drained Up to $114B in One Year Southeast Asian fraud syndicates have consolidated into a unified, technology-driven criminal economy increasingly reliant on crypto, according to a new UNODC warning. Once-fragmented networks have merged into a single interconnected ecosystem, using cryptocurrency as a primary tool for moving and laundering illicit proceeds. The UNODC estimates vi

👍92💯1🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC≈2,190 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

💎💎💎💎💎 The CLARITY Act text is expected Thursday following a meeting with Trump, though Senate Democrats indicate they do not support it. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍82🔥2💯1

11 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,120 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔐 Google quantum advance sharpens post-quantum crypto timeline Google has achieved a new quantum calibration breakthrough that researchers say accelerates the timeline for post-quantum cryptography adoption — a development with direct implications for blockchain and digital asset security. The advance underscores growing urgency for crypto protocols to migrate toward quantum-resistant encryption standards before su

👍84💯1🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,950 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Investors have been withdrawing funds from spot Bitcoin ETFs for 8 consecutive weeks, totaling $8.3 billion outflows. Last week alone saw a net outflow of $526 million. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍93💯1🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC≈2,040 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🤖 OpenAI Offered US Government 5% Stake OpenAI reportedly offered Trump's administration a 5% stake in the company to reduce political risks and "share AI benefits with society," according to Financial Times. The stake was intended to be placed in a special fund similar to the Alaska Permanent Fund. With OpenAI valued at $852 billion, this share would be worth about $42.6 billion. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍83👏1🔥1

30 Jun 2026, 19:23 UTC≈1,650 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Wall Street Legend Jeremy Grantham Outlines Core Flaws in Bitcoin's Monetary Case The traditional financial sector pushes back once again. GMO's co-founder noted that Bitcoin has failed to transition into a dependable safe-haven asset. Without real-world commercial utility, Grantham believes its current valuation relies entirely on the expectation of selling to the next buyer at a higher price. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍102👏2🔥2🥰1

27 Jun 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,910 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Cardano was the third largest cryptocurrency with a market cap of $101 billion, now down 95% from its all-time high and valued at $5.2 billion. Polkadot was the fourth largest cryptocurrency with a market cap of $60 billion, now down 98% from its all-time high and valued at $1.45 billion. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍104👏1🔥1

24 Jun 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,560 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Over 1,200 Japanese Companies Affected as Pension Fund Approves Crypto Allocation Retirement planning meets Web3. The Japanese corporate pension framework is pivoting toward digital reserves, concluding that high asset liquidity now justifies micro-exposure for long-term yields. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍104🔥2👏1

20 Jun 2026, 10:01 UTC≈2,270 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Arkham: Morgan Stanley is the last ETF buying Bitcoin The only ETF provider with net flows above $10M this week has been Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley bought $25.8M BTC while every other provider net sold a total of $201.7M of BTC. 💰𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙨

👍94🔥2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @CRYPTO_WALLETS_TM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,231,069 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Wallet™” (@CRYPTO_WALLETS_TM), 44,889 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CRYPTO_WALLETS_TM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.