Channel
CRYPTO QUALITY SIGNALS
@CQS_Cornix
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,059subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001454943991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CQS_Cornix |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CQS_Cornix |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 1,059 | -3 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 1,062 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 1,062 | -7 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 1,069 | -6 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 1,075 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 1,076 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 1,079 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 1,081 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 1,088 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 1,091 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 1,094 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 1,098 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 1,104 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 1,107 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 1,109 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,111 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptopumpcIub · 23,612
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
@VerifiedCryptoTraders0 · 67,250
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO QUALITY SIGNALS” (@CQS_Cornix), 1,059 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CQS_Cornix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.