Channel
@CPG_Archive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,654subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001504468258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CPG_Archive |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CPG_Archive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 1,654 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 1,651 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 1,647 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 1,648 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 1,646 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,641 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,639 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,636 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 1,636 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
99 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2023 to 5 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
السلام عليكم باذن الله راح اسوي النسخة الثالثة والاخيرة لملف تقييم الدكاترة (الا لو احد وده يمسك الموضوع بعدي 🤝) علشان كذا ياليت لو الكل يقيم الدكاترة الي درس عندهم في الاستبيان علشان نطلع باكبر عدد من التقييمات بحيث يستفيد الكل الاستبيان ماياخذ اكثر من ٣ دقايق https://forms.office.com/r/2AjCw6rGZ8
❤11
File, posted without a caption
❤2
وضبطناكم بملف تقدرون ترتبون فيه خطتكم الاكاديمية، واذا احتجتوا اي مساعدة، حنا موجودين 😉🫡
❤3
تحتاج استشارة؟ حفّار يقولكم اذا تحتاجون مساعدة حنا موجودين 😉🛢️ 📍 لوبي مبنى 76 📆 الأثنين والثلاثاء، 3 و 4 فبراير ⏰ من الساعة 9:00 صباحاً الى 4:00 مساءً حفّارين خبراء راح يكونون متواجدين لأي سؤال او استشارة متعلقة بــ: 🔹 الخطة الدراسية 🔹 التخصصات الدقيقة 🔹 التدريب الصيفي 🔹 التبادل الطلابي او اي شي آخر 🫡👷🏻♂️
❤2
🔴 لا تنسون تأكيد الترم الديدلاين اليوم
🔴 انهيت بحمد الله النسخة الثانية من ملف تقييم دكاترة الكلية وفيه تقييم ل٢٧ دكتور في الكلية ✅ أضفت ٦ دكاترة زيادة ✅ زادت عدد التقييمات لكل دكتور وهالشي يزيد من دقة التقييم مشكورين جداً على تعاونكم في التقييم وان شاء الله القادم افضل 🫡🫡
❤14
File, posted without a caption
❤9
🔗منقول بتصرف: بحكم شغلي و خبرتي المتواضعة في الرقوق وقيامي بتجربة تقريبا جميع الوظائف والمسميات. حبيت اشارككم بهذا الشرح المختصر والمبسط للمسميات في الرقوق. ذكرت المسؤوليات باختصار ولم اذكر كل شيء. 🔷 الجزء الاول: طاقم منصة الحفر (الرق) • Roustabout: اول وظيفة يبدأ فيها العامل في الرقوق وظيفته او مسؤوليته هي تنظيف وترتيب ارضية الرق والمعدات ويتضمن الصباغة. • Roughneck/Floorman: وظيفته بالغالب تكون على ارضية ال…
❤8
والاهم ان التقييم يكون عادل وبدون مبالغة وشكراً 🙏🙏
❤3
حاول تقيم كل الدكاترة الي درست معهم مواد التخصص وتشاركنا ملاحظاتك عن الدكتور
التقييم بسيط جداً وما ياخذ اكثر من ٣ دقايق
🔴🔴 رابط تقييم الدكاترة راح اجهز النسخة الثانية من الملف الخاص بتقييم الدكاترة 👆🏻 هذا الملف راح تستفيدون منه ويستفيدون منه الدفعات الجاية واحتاج فقط مساعدتكم الرابط تقييم فيه الدكاترة الي درست عندهم سواء هذا الترم او الاترام الي قبل: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=iLC0KX3SKUG5-YY3tZ6ks_TpAD5onddBvqaaYr8QcrhUNVo1OFBFWldLTzA0N0ExOEhBSVZSRFRKTS4u
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CPG_Archive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CPG Files” (@CPG_Archive), 1,654 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CPG_Archive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.