Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

#GREENGREEN

@CORTISABOUT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003954485014
TypeChannel
Username@CORTISABOUT
Description@eMewek 's
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 15 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/CORTISABOUT

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:163first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
1
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 3 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4130.6%
🔥2720.1%
🥰1712.7%
❤‍🔥139.70%
💘128.96%
👏53.73%
🆒42.99%
😎42.99%
🍾32.24%
🎉32.24%
21.49%
💯21.49%
🏆10.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 May 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,230 views44 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤ Bearing in mind that a first step carries its own moment, I found myself unable to restrain the outpouring of jubilant acclaim. ⚹ Though modest in scale, it remains a tale worth enshrining. ⏣ +26 | Should greater triumphs await them in the days ahead, this moment will endure as a cherished prelude. Let the world revolve, if only for today, in their honor. 🎲 To celebrating the release of the mi

❤‍🔥12🔥8👏5😎4🍾3🎉3🆒32

1 May 2026, 10:33 UTC47 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @CortisProjectPhoto

ㅤㅤㅤ GREEͶ! ØR “RĒD-RĒD”¿ ㅤㅤㅤ✶ DISPATCH FROM ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤTHE GREEN ZONE 🚦 ㅤ ㅤㅤ #GREENGREEN — $055 ㅤ everything before GREENGREEN ㅤㅤ was just the prologue 🔛🔝 ㅤㅤ2nd EP • Now in full bloom ㅤㅤㅤ📲 BRACE YOURSELF! ㅤㅤㅤ A. _CORTIS 🚹🛜✶ Detonating their long-awaited resurgence with GREENGREEN, the sophomore EP that’s been reverberating through the underground like a suppressed tremor, .. Verdant Detonation / IS. / 'UP

20 Apr 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,060 views73 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Telelings! The day has come, After the long-last time of our comeback, we're #Cortis finally is back with our new songs ”RedRed.” ★ Hopefully with this comeback, we can accept and receive many loves and graces. I want to say congratulations to Cortis, Coer and all Cortis Portrayals! ♥️ It's your hard work, CORTIS. It looks like you've put a lot of work into this. Much obliged for the drops of sweat that

25🔥18🥰17💘12🏆1

20 Apr 2026, 09:27 UTC≈1,480 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Amusement comes within utter compelling bliss. ✶ The most fascinating benisons continuously a—day filled with preciseness and illuminates realm escorted parenthesis furthers entire fascinating light. Midst today's delight, CORTIS has released an altered song for their comeback. 📟 ⋆ Every chords is impeccable within catchy euphonious impression, carving-out decency within the conscience and the me

14❤‍🔥1🔥1🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CORTISABOUT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,323,062 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#GREENGREEN” (@CORTISABOUT), 3 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CORTISABOUT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.