9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,628–4,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 06:55
4,668
-12
24 Aug 2026, 14:56
4,680
-19
20 Aug 2026, 14:23
4,699
-26
17 Aug 2026, 12:33
4,725
-80
14 Aug 2026, 05:38
4,805
-79
10 Aug 2026, 17:21
4,884
-45
7 Aug 2026, 19:21
4,929
-5
6 Aug 2026, 23:45
4,934
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:35
4,934
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.50%
avg views ÷ 4,668 subscribers
Avg views / post
257
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
67 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
17,200
Reactions total
239
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
239 reactions across 67 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🥰
29
12.1%
🔥
27
11.3%
🎉
22
9.21%
😘
18
7.53%
😍
16
6.69%
🐳
14
5.86%
😁
13
5.44%
❤
11
4.60%
👍
11
4.60%
😎
11
4.60%
🙈
11
4.60%
🤩
11
4.60%
🕊
10
4.18%
⚡
7
2.93%
👏
7
2.93%
🗿
7
2.93%
❤🔥
6
2.51%
💯
4
1.67%
😈
4
1.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 CFTC invoca poderes de emergencia para mantener a Kalshi operando en la lucha de Nueva York
La orden intensifica una lucha jurisdiccional sobre si los estados pueden tratar los contratos de eventos regulados a nivel federal como juegos de azar ilegales.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 Ravencoin alcanza un mínimo histórico mientras un exploit de red pone en riesgo las transacciones
Los grupos mineros que controlan la mayor parte de la tasa de hash de Ravencoin están construyendo una cadena competitiva que podría desencadenar una reorganización de tres días.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 Ravencoin alcanza un mínimo histórico mientras un exploit de red pone en riesgo las transacciones
Los grupos mineros que controlan la mayor parte de la tasa de hash de Ravencoin están construyendo una cadena competitiva que podría desencadenar una reorganización de tres días.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 La SEC y la CFTC demandan a Goliath Ventures por un esquema Ponzi criptográfico de 400 millones de dólares
Los reguladores alegan que Goliat prometió retornos del fondo de liquidez criptográfico, pero en cambio pagó a los inversores anteriores y financió el gasto de lujo de su fundador.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 Itaú se suma al piloto de tokenización de Brasil con OpenAssets
El banco probará valores tokenizados de renta fija y fondos de inversión como parte de un piloto industrial liderado por ANBIMA.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 La SEC abordará las regulaciones criptográficas en ausencia de la aprobación de CLARITY
El regulador de valores de EE. UU. programó una reunión esta semana con el potencial de intensificar las políticas de activos digitales sin la acción del Congreso.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 MoneyGram amplía las rampas de efectivo criptográfico a Solana
El servicio Ramps de MoneyGram ahora conecta billeteras y aplicaciones de Solana a su red global de efectivo, y Rift se convierte en la primera billetera en integrar el servicio.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 Tras el retraso del Senado, el proyecto de ley sobre criptomonedas tiene una ventana estrecha para convertirse en ley
Después del receso de agosto, los legisladores del Senado tendrán sólo 36 días de sesión antes de fin de año para aprobar la Ley CLARITY.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 El director ejecutivo de Strategy dice que la empresa reanudará la acumulación de Bitcoin este año
La compañía ha comprado aproximadamente 25 veces más BTC de lo que vendió este año, a pesar de las ventas recientes que desafiaron su estrategia de acumulación de larga data.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 ARP Digital obtiene la licencia de corredor-distribuidor VARA de Dubai
La licencia permite a ARP Digital ofrecer conversiones de activos digitales regulados y monedas estables a dirhams de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos a medida que expande su presencia en el Golfo más allá de Bahréin.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 FlightAware demanda a Kalshi por datos de cancelación de vuelos
La acción legal contra Kalshi se centró en la infracción de marca registrada y el daño a su reputación, además de citar a autoridades estatales que compararon los contratos de la empresa con los juegos de azar.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
🔥 Flowdesk, respaldado por Coinbase, obtiene una licencia completa de corredor de bolsa en Dubai
La aprobación de VARA de Flowdesk sigue a su autorización MiCA en Francia a medida que las empresas de cifrado construyen operaciones reguladas en los principales mercados globales.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📰 CRYPTO | @CODLeagueChampionsVIP
😁2🥰1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @CODLeagueChampionsVIP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,430,213 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💶𝔏𝔦𝔤𝔞 𝔇𝔢 ℭ𝔞𝔪𝔭𝔢𝔬𝔫𝔢𝔰️️💎” (@CODLeagueChampionsVIP), 4,668 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CODLeagueChampionsVIP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.