Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 交州議事共識

Channel

交州議事共識

@CNLTSkongsjeq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001448342366
TypeChannel
Username@CNLTSkongsjeq
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 10 May 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CNLTSkongsjeq

Growth

171817.56 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 25 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 01:3517-1
24 Aug 2026, 05:3718+1
11 Aug 2026, 19:4717no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:5517first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 May 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2026, 07:37 UTC80 viewsread 11 August 2026

議嶺南道事 循一陳一駁復申辯之。疏:屌那媽即系話只能講一次野駁人一次同反駁一次 主簿總辭定式。或多數決或雙序決。疏:有人定斷投票方式 遂表決之。疏:投票阿屌老母 經流放三千里至交州之罪犯甲疏 請定義何謂廣告。無須擧證。陳述其意味 每人只允許發言陳述一次 結束陳情。目前爲:駁

23 Apr 2022, 17:05 UTC914 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

就限制轉發管制

  1. 附議33%
  2. 反對50%
  3. 棄權17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jul 2020, 10:22 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

群友名稱或昵稱應否受上海群第二條 「惡語或侮辱之定義」管制。

  1. 應該53%
  2. 不應該34%
  3. 有必要就群友名稱另加管制13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CNLTSkongsjeq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Apr 2022, 17:05 UTCFinal Results36 voters

就限制轉發管制

  1. 附議33%
  2. 反對50%
  3. 棄權17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jul 2020, 10:22 UTCFinal Results38 voters

群友名稱或昵稱應否受上海群第二條 「惡語或侮辱之定義」管制。

  1. 應該53%
  2. 不應該34%
  3. 有必要就群友名稱另加管制13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jul 2020, 06:49 UTCFinal Results27 voters

就社會共識之噁心、不適媒介管制

  1. 一律以非嵌入連結傳播並文字描述轉發內容以作警示26%
  2. 圖片以非嵌入連結傳播。影片可隨意轉發。但兩者傳播時皆需以文字描述內容以作警示7%
  3. 任由之67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jun 2020, 03:38 UTCAnonymous Poll130 voters

就新成員限制及防廣告設置

  1. 撤防廣告機械人。入群全部禁言。人工檢驗。39%
  2. 換廣告機器人24%
  3. 維持目前37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 May 2020, 02:37 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

動議就禁止相同、相近、不具識別頭像混淆身份重新返回群規。 並且舜華對該群友致歉並截圖及置頂一周。停止執行一周或以上

  1. 附議49%
  2. 反對26%
  3. 再討論26%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2020 to 20 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“交州議事共識” (@CNLTSkongsjeq), 17 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CNLTSkongsjeq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.