Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Candy Noir Lace

@CNL3LAIR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004344379612
TypeChannel
Username@CNL3LAIR
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 17 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CNL3LAIR

Growth

333433.510 Aug 2026, 10:02 — 34 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:32 — 34 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 05:27 — 33 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:0211 Aug 2026, 05:27
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:2733-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:3234no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:0234first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
174.0%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.4
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (17 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total804
Reactions total154
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53052579489335576604126.6%
custom 54453082597013840864126.6%
custom 53012633458804291473724.0%
custom 53437938815719576773522.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC19 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🤍🎀ew post . #aisha 🤍 🤩 — I love her 🥺🥺 помочь каналу стать красивее💕

custom 53437938815719576775custom 53012633458804291474custom 53052579489335576604custom 54453082597013840864

Signed

25 Jul 2026, 00:40 UTC62 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🖤🎀ew post . . #рисунки 🖤 🤩- мы с аишей порисовали, целый час блин. мы очень старались! 🤩 розовый котик - лали ; серый котик - аиша помочь каналу стать красивее ‘’ 🖤

custom 53052579489335576605custom 53437938815719576775custom 53012633458804291474custom 54453082597013840862

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

25 Jul 2026, 00:40 UTC57 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

22 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC69 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🧿#анон 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤- *видео* 🤩- ребята, нам посвятили ещё одно видео(( оно очень смешное, мы с аишей с него посмеялись. очень мило, что вы тратите свое время на нас, это очень приятно! очень любим, спасибо 🥺 🤩- я оч рада, что вы умудряетесь найти время сделать нам видео, я вообще не думала, что нам будут даже видео посвящать а так я очень благодарна, видео реально классное, спасибо зая, которая это сделалаа💛 анон лали ; а

custom 53052579489335576606custom 53012633458804291475custom 54453082597013840865custom 53437938815719576771

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

21 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC54 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

вот ваша сакурная лали на самом деле……

custom 54453082597013840866custom 53012633458804291475custom 53052579489335576604custom 53437938815719576774

Signed

21 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC80 viewsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

21 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🎀ew post . . #тесты #lali 🤩 тест: что для вас значит любовь? 🙂 🤩- у нас с аишей одинаковый результат, это очень кьют будем рады, если вы поделитесь своим результатом! помочь каналу стать красивее 🤩

custom 53052579489335576604custom 53012633458804291473custom 53437938815719576773custom 54453082597013840862

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

21 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC59 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🤩- ребята, хочу поблагодарить вас за ваш актив!! это безумно радует, а тут ещё и такое (( мы всех очень любим

custom 53012633458804291473custom 53052579489335576603custom 54453082597013840863custom 53437938815719576772

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

21 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC60 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🧿#анон 🙂🙂🙂🙂 🖤- Привет вы канон 🤩- спасибо 🥹🥹 нам безумно приятно, что вы сделали для нас видео (( это очень неожиданно, но мило! у нас вроде небольшая аудитория, а тут такое..оцени любим и ценим!! 🤩- спасибооо, я оч рада что у нас есть такие хорошие подписчики, которые радуют нас таким🫶 🖤- прivit я вас нарисовала но я не умею рисовать глаза поэтому вместо глазиков у вас пуговки 🥺🥺 посему качество такое плохое😳😳😳 теле

custom 54453082597013840866custom 53012633458804291474custom 53437938815719576774custom 53052579489335576603

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

20 Jul 2026, 22:56 UTC52 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👅👅👅

custom 54453082597013840865custom 53052579489335576603custom 53437938815719576773custom 53012633458804291471

Signed

20 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @koobitt

лаиша КАНОНИЩЕ!!!!!!!!!!!!

Signed

20 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC58 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#разговоры 🤩🤩 🤩- нам скоро месяц 🤩- ураАааАааАааАаа

custom 54453082597013840864custom 53012633458804291472custom 53052579489335576602custom 53437938815719576772

Signed ㅤTiny Fawn ⋆˚𓂂𓏸

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @CNL3LAIR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,159,199 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Candy Noir Lace” (@CNL3LAIR), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CNL3LAIR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.