Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CNA necapturat

Channel

CNA necapturat

@CNA_necapturat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,462subscribers

-14,933 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672718486
TypeChannel
Username@CNA_necapturat
DescriptionCanalul official al grupului de ofițeri onești activi și veterani cinstiți din CNA
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CNA_necapturat

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,46228,39520,928.526 August 2026 — 28,395 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,295 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,162 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,072 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,958 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,795 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,646 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,521 subscribers3 September 2026 — 27,291 subscribers5 September 2026 — 27,104 subscribers9 September 2026 — 26,563 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,126 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,909 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,277 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,251 subscribers25 September 2026 — 17,083 subscribers3 October 2026 — 16,764 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,370 subscribers12 October 2026 — 16,115 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,019 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,976 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,920 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,891 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,843 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,755 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,651 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,508 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,306 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,184 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,012 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,915 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,820 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,652 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,530 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,314 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,073 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,895 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,641 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,586 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,518 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,462 subscribers26 August 20264 November 2026
41 measurements spanning 70 days, net -14,933. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,222–30,635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 11:1613,462-56
3 Nov 2026, 10:4013,518-68
2 Nov 2026, 11:5813,586-55
1 Nov 2026, 09:4813,641-254
31 Oct 2026, 09:2813,895-178
30 Oct 2026, 09:4014,073-241
29 Oct 2026, 11:3014,314-216
28 Oct 2026, 10:1914,530-122
27 Oct 2026, 12:5114,652-168
26 Oct 2026, 12:5614,820-95
25 Oct 2026, 16:0514,915-97
24 Oct 2026, 16:4415,012-172
23 Oct 2026, 19:0015,184-122
22 Oct 2026, 20:4615,306-202
21 Oct 2026, 17:2115,508-143
20 Oct 2026, 10:4715,651-104
19 Oct 2026, 08:1815,755-88
18 Oct 2026, 08:2015,843-48
17 Oct 2026, 05:2715,891-29
16 Oct 2026, 07:5515,920first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.3%
avg views ÷ 13,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,790
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.673%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held21 (23 July 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total52,740
Reactions total355
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
732
Videos
95
Links
151

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 35s
Average length
4m 35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

988 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤17918.1%
🔥15015.2%
😱13513.7%
🤬10610.7%
👍535.36%
🤯505.06%
🤣414.15%
👏383.85%
😁373.74%
🤔363.64%
🤮292.94%
🖕262.63%
🤡262.63%
💩212.13%
🙉161.62%
🙏131.32%
👎90.911%
👀50.506%
💊50.506%
💯40.405%
5 further kinds90.911%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 988 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CNA_necapturat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Oct 2026, 14:58 UTC≈5,410 views77 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Baza de date a Agenției Guvernare Electronică a fost achiziționată la preț de sute de mii de euro, de gestionarii call-centrelor. Urmează un nou val de escrocherii. Tranzacția a avut loc într-un oficiu din strada Calea Ieșilor 6D

😱47🔥23❤4🤬2👍1

14 Oct 2026, 00:05 UTC≈10,300 views39 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

După jucheala angenților economici, protecție la tot felul de jurnaliști și scurgerile organizate în Telegram, Oleg Bîrliba “va face regulă jucheală” la CNA. Securitatea internă a CNA se ocupă mai cu nimic. O structură care pune ochiul pe dosarele unde se poate de rupt niște bani. Mai mulți angajați din direcție deja au pregătit rapoartele de transfer în alte subdiviziuni sau de demisie. Nimeni cu vrea să lucreze cu …

😱22❤8👍7🤡2

13 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTC≈8,190 views59 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Oleg Birliba migrează la CNA - șef al Direcției Securitate Internă

🤯34❤9🙉8🤡5👍3

8 Oct 2026, 06:52 UTC≈10,600 views132 reactionsread 4 November 2026

SURSELE NOASRTE DIN PARLAMENT ne informează despre faptul că în legislativ urmează să fie aprobată producerea de drone pe teritoriul Republicii Moldova 🇲🇩 pentru Ucraina 🇺🇦 precum și transferul unor obiecte ale Industriei armate la noi în țară, inclusiv implicarea în conflictul din est până în 2030 prin deschiderea unui nou front. Alegeri prezidențiale și parlamentare nu vor mai fi….

😱55🖕24😁18🔥11💩8❤7🤡4🍾2

6 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC≈9,100 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Urmează investigație bombă 💣 Casele procurorului….reformat-vetting

❤10😁6

6 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC≈9,140 views32 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

La o nevinovată anecdotă spusă de Coman Andrei Andeici care anterior a fost investigat de CNA și PA, scăpînd basma curată după ce i-a cadonat un apartament de la KIRSAN procurorului Victor Muntean….s-a cam răsuflat moșul despre casa din Spania 🇪🇸 a beneficiarului efectiv Victor Muntean….. Moșneagul jidan și procurorul țigan-combinația mortală a istoriei unei mite…

🔥20❤7😱3🤔2

1 Oct 2026, 09:52 UTC≈10,200 views80 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Un val de rețineri ai executorilor din call-centre deja a fost pornit. În următoarele zile mai mulți capi ai call-centrelor printre care și Sorin Guzgan urmează să fie reținuți alături de angajați ai poliției și CNA care se hrăneau din protecția schemelor. Pentru reținerea lui Radu Marian deocamdată nu a fost consens politic, dar asta deocamdată….

❤37👏29🤔10👍2🤡2

25 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC≈13,000 views72 reactionsread 4 November 2026

-Vasile Costiuc -Alexandru Verșinin -Petru Vlah -Blanari Vitalie -Jovmir Ala -Vlad Bilețchi -Vladimir Cebotari -Victor Pruteanu -Natalia Morari -Gheorghe Gonța -Fadei Nagacevschi -Dumitru Buimistru -Tatiana Costachi -Sergiu Badan -Fulga Grabovski -Dumitru Cucu -Tamara Chișca-Doneva -Aureliu Colenco -Vlad Filat -Vadim Banaru A doua parte urmează….

🤬38💩10👏9❤6👀4😁4🎉1

25 Sept 2026, 16:42 UTC≈9,870 views55 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Sancțiunile SIS împotriva persoanelor asociate care au legături financiare, politice ori operaționale cu subiecții aflați sub restricții internaționale precum Ilan Șor, Vladimir Plahotniuc, Irina Vlah, Veaceslav Platon, Vladimir Andronachi, Vasile Tarlev, Victoria Furtună, Ion Ceban, se află spre aprobare la Emisarovici. Noi însă la 00:00 vom publica o parte din politicieni, jurnaliști, firme, apărători, afaceriști ș…

🤮13👎9🔥8😱7❤6👍4🤬4🙈3

23 Sept 2026, 04:36 UTC≈8,710 views58 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @vladbiletchiPhoto

Domnule emisar, Sursele noastre demne de încredere ne spun că un domn pe nume Narea Octavian de la direcția securitate internă SIS ne-a făcut "dosare speciale" mai multora care suntem incomozi și prea vocali. Formal - pentru a descoperi "contactele noastre din SIS". Real - pentru a putea desfășura MSI - măsuri speciale de investigație asupra noastră și a înțelege felul în care circulă informația incomodă pe Telegra…

🔥41❤13👍1🤡1😁1😱1

16 Sept 2026, 06:26 UTC≈8,560 views27 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @uefarapasPhoto

💴Ruslan Roșca nu a fost reținut de CNA. Unicul angajat reținut fiind Ioniță. Soția lui Ioniță activează la Inspecția Procurorilor

🤮14😁8❤3🔥2

15 Sept 2026, 20:56 UTC≈9,930 views27 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Și fiică-sa Alexandra Roșca care este cea care așează candidații în mașinile de examinare și decide pe care rută să fie examinați acestea. Ea este cea care scrie cu stiloul rută pe chestionarul de examinare! Acesta este SISTEMUL AUTOMATIZAT DE ATRIBUIRE ALIATORIE A RUTELOR DE EXAMINARE A SUPER-PAS-MANAGERULUI MIRCEA EȘANU

🤬15🤣9👍2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @CNA_necapturat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTCAnonymous Poll680 voters

Cine a ciripit despre mită dată directorului SIS Alexandru Musteață

  1. Petru Jelihovschi8%
  2. Vladimir Cebotari70%
  3. Dorin Pavelescu6%
  4. Iurie Cramarenco6%
  5. Călin Corjan11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

spovedanialuirizeaofficial
@spovedanialuirizeaofficial · 27,532
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
OBSERVATORUL
@observatorul · 20,629
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Ungureanu 112
@Ungureanu112 · 46,619
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Poliția Republicii Moldova
@Politia_Republicii_Moldova · 33,224
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
luchianiuc.com
@luchianiuc_com · 24,702
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
ȘTIRI.MD
@stirimd · 37,669
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Redactia.md
@Redactia_MD · 35,236
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
GALBEN (Dorin Galben)
@galbendorin · 25,293
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
INDEX🇲🇩 CREDIBIL
@indexMLD · 20,672
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
Salarii în Moldova
@Salarii_Moldova · 27,833
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Бюджетные Путешествия Молдова
@touristmd · 27,892
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Point.md
@PointNews · 61,354
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CNA necapturat” (@CNA_necapturat), 13,462 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CNA_necapturat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.