BlackRock broke the streak. After 17 straight days of net redemptions from US spot Ethereum ETFs, a $19.3M inflow — all into BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) — flipped the ledger on June 4–5. 📉➡️📈 This isn’t a market-wide thaw: ETH price stayed weak and broader ETF categories barely moved. The takeaway: ETF flows remain highly concentrated and can create misleading headlines when one dominant product rebala…

Channel
Crypto Market Analysis
@CMAnalysis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,964subscribers
-253 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002232529390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CMAnalysis |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 6 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CMAnalysis |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 4,964 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 4,977 | -25 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 5,002 | -32 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 5,034 | -30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 5,064 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 5,074 | -25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 5,099 | -23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 5,122 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 5,135 | -19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 5,154 | -18 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 5,172 | -20 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 5,192 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 5,216 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 5,217 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
855 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 334 | 39.1% | |
| 👍 | 324 | 37.9% | |
| 🥰 | 93 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 5.96% | |
| 👌 | 43 | 5.03% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 1.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 855 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2024 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Market snapshot: U.S. spot crypto ETFs posted strong inflows in May, yet June opened with notable net outflows for BTC and ETH funds. At the same time, on‑chain data shows large wallets and whales accumulating ETH and concentrating supply. The result: a clear ETF — whale divergence — institutional products pulling liquidity while smart money buys. Watch ETF flow cadence vs exchange reserves; that spread will steer sh…
🚀 #SOL VanEck predicts that Solana could rise to $330. "Solana’s market cap has a strong chance of reaching 50% of Ethereum’s (#ETH) market cap." "Solana’s blockchain processes 3000% more transactions than Ethereum and has 1300% more daily active users, showcasing its potential advantages in efficiency and scalability." Crypto Market Analysis
👍301❤265🥰91👌43🔥18👏10
🔥🇨🇳 Analysts predict BTC to surge to $78,000 in the coming weeks amid the announcement of a "stimulus package for China's economy." The People's Bank of China (PBOC) is set to inject $140 billion of liquidity into the financial system by lowering the reserve requirement ratio (RRR*) by 50 basis points. Additionally, China has eased property purchase regulations and will recapitalize its largest banks for the first …
❤14🔥8
🔓 Top Token Unlocks from September 23 to 29: ▫️ VENOM - $25.11M ▫️ YGG - $6.57M ▫️ AGIX - $5.73M ▫️ FET - $5.61M ▫️ ENA - $3.80M ▫️ GAL - $0.98M Crypto Market Analysis
👍14🔥6🥰2
#Hack ❌ BingX exchange was hacked for $26 million – PeckShield. BingX (official statement): "A small portion of assets from the hot wallet were affected, but the majority of funds remain secure. To protect our clients, we are extending deposit/withdrawal times while bolstering security. The hacking attempt has been stopped." Approximately $43 million was stolen (via Twitter). Crypto Market Analysis
❤15
🔝 Top 4 countries by Bitcoin holdings! (Arkham) ▪️USA – $12,160,000,000 ▪️UK – $3,670,000,000 ▪️Bhutan – $785,460,000 ▪️El Salvador – $351,750,000 Honorable mention – Germany now holds "ZERO" (following a sale of $3.56B). Crypto Market Analysis
❤12👍2
⚡️ Jerome Powell (Chairman of the Federal Reserve): ✔️ The economy remains generally strong. ✔️ The labor market continues to cool, which is a significant step forward compared to the beginning of this year. ✔️ Today's decision reflects growing confidence that labor market stability can be maintained. ✔️ Consumer spending remains steady. ✔️ Inflation has noticeably decreased but remains above our target level. ✔️ Th…
👍4🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔞 FAIL Another crypto investor "gifted" $649,000 to scammers after copying the scammer's wallet address from transaction history… Crypto Market Analysis
🔥6
#ETF #CashFlow 😮 BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF (#IBIT) recorded an INFLOW of funds yesterday for the first time in 3 weeks The issuer currently holds 357,550 BTC ($20.7 billion). Crypto Market Analysis
👍3❤2
🚀 According to Cointelegraph, Bitcoin could rise to $100,000 - $150,000 by the first quarter of 2025. There is speculation that this could follow the completion of the classic technical analysis pattern "Cup and Handle" on BTC. Crypto Market Analysis
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CMAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bertsmilenftgamer · 28,635
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
@CaptainsBay · 84,659
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Market Analysis” (@CMAnalysis), 4,964 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CMAnalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.