Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

клеопс

@CLEOPSE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002002511054
TypeChannel
Username@CLEOPSE
Description🔕🔕🔕
Created7 January 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CLEOPSE

Growth

112 August 2026 — 1 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1 subscribers12 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:311no change
12 Aug 2026, 08:321first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 7 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 1 post, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52875265071644791134526.8%
custom 52898650696125108483621.4%
custom 52877540631217572392514.9%
custom 5287680400137663694116.55%
custom 5287279799948030603105.95%
custom 528743616682237572495.36%
custom 528725317544576259274.17%
custom 528749578526341242974.17%
custom 528769749840246751474.17%
custom 528746685865867384563.57%
custom 528746983936597602552.98%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2024 to 9 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2024, 21:00 UTC≈3,470 views168 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

шоколадницу из далека видно

custom 528752650716447911345custom 528986506961251084836custom 528775406312175723925custom 528768040013766369411custom 528727979994803060310custom 52874361668223757249custom 52872531754457625927custom 52874957852634124297

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @CLEOPSE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 700,387 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“клеопс” (@CLEOPSE), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CLEOPSE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.