Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

经济新闻 时政资讯 🌎

@CJXW2

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,961subscribers

-237 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002762160345
TypeChannel
Username@CJXW2
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CJXW2

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CJXW1/98406 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC@CJXW2/6909 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@CJXW1/98446 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC@CJXW2/6912 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@CJXW1/98466 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC@CJXW2/6914 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@CJXW1/98486 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC@CJXW2/6916 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@CJXW1/98687 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC@CJXW2/6919 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@CJXW1/98727 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC@CJXW2/6922 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@CJXW119 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@CJXW1 (190)
@CCTV_Finance8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 hours@CCTV_Finance (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 26 of the 27 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @CJXW1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,96110,19810,079.57 August 2026 — 10,198 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,198 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,134 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,013 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,003 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,961 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,925–10,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:489,961-42
12 Aug 2026, 04:5610,003-10
11 Aug 2026, 06:0210,013-59
10 Aug 2026, 03:1110,072-62
9 Aug 2026, 01:5110,134-64
7 Aug 2026, 23:0510,198no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3210,198first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.30%
avg views ÷ 9,961 subscribers
Avg views / post
329
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
58
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held58 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total19,076
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC89 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

西太平洋银行房贷申请量骤降20% 股价周一大跌逾5% 2026年8月10日,西太平洋银行(ASX:WBC)股价大跌5.14%,收报35.98澳元,大幅跑输大盘。当日标普/ASX 200指数下跌约0.5%,金融板块子指数下跌约1.9%。 股价重挫源于该行披露房屋贷款申请量急剧下滑。数据显示,2025年5月15日至7月31日期间,月均房贷申请量从此前约2.9万件下降20%至约2.6万件。其中投资性房贷申请量下滑26%,自住型房贷申请量下降18%。 申请量放缓源于澳大利亚政府在5月预算案中宣布的房产税调整措施,涉及负扣税及资本利得税优惠的修订,削减了房产投资者此前享有的部分税收优惠。西太平洋银行预计上述影响将持续发酵,预测投资性住房信贷增速将从2026年的9.1%放缓至2027年的4.5%,2028年进一步回落至4.4%。 尽管房贷前景趋弱,该行季度业绩整体仍具韧性。季度现金利润约18亿澳元,低于去年同期的19亿澳元;贷款及保

12 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC87 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

韩元领跌亚洲货币美元小幅走高 日元回吐干预涨幅重破158关口 2026年8月10日,韩元领跌亚洲主要货币,美元指数小幅上涨0.18%至99.72,徘徊于2022年6月以来最低水平附近。投资者聚焦即将公布的美国通胀数据,以研判美联储利率路径。 美元兑韩元上涨0.54%至1,415.05,韩元成为早盘表现最弱的亚洲货币。油价攀升至每桶84美元附近,能源进口依赖使韩元对燃料价格尤为敏感。日元同样走弱,美元兑日元上涨0.30%至158.27,此前美日联合干预带来的涨幅已大幅回吐。在日元跌至近40年低点逼近164关口后,日本与美国于1998年以来首次联手入市买入日元,一度将日元推升至155附近,但随后再度跌破158。日元本月已累计下跌约0.5%,7月曾上涨3.2%,凸显干预局限性。 澳元兑美元下跌0.14%至0.7058,纽元兑美元跌0.2%至0.5884,市场静待澳大利亚储备银行周二政策决议。美元兑人民币小幅上涨0.05%至6.7

12 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC89 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

郑州公布2026年阶梯电价执行名单 九家水泥及电解铝企业能耗达标 2026年8月10日,郑州市发展和改革委员会发布通知,对全市电解铝、水泥、钢铁企业执行2026年度阶梯电价,自2026年6月1日起追溯执行。 根据能耗核查结果,登封市宏昌水泥、登封市嵩基水泥、天瑞新登郑州水泥、登封中联登电水泥、天瑞集团郑州水泥、河南永安水泥、河南双龙建材、新郑市恒发水泥厂、郑州顺宝水泥等9家水泥企业能耗达标,执行一档阶梯电价。河南中孚铝业有限公司作为电解铝企业,能耗达标同样执行一档电价。 中国长城铝业有限公司环保新材料厂因能耗超标,在一档阶梯电价基础上另加0.35元/kwh。 钢铁企业方面,河南福华钢铁集团、郑州永通特钢有限公司、河南昌泰不锈钢板有限公司3家企业2025年全年处于停产状态。 通知明确,涉及差别化电价的生产企业须严格执行用电加价,对以各种理由拒交加价电费的,各级供电主体应依法依规处理。此次阶梯电价执行有助于引导高耗能行业节

12 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC84 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

宝莱特控制权变更终止 复牌首日20CM跌停市值蒸发超10亿 2026年8月10日,宝莱特(300246)开盘即遭“20CM”跌停,报收15.41元/股,最新市值降至41亿元,单日市值蒸发逾10亿元。 消息面上,宝莱特于8月9日晚间公告称,终止筹划控制权变更事项。公司表示,控股股东与交易对方就可能导致控制权变动的相关重大事项进行了充分探讨,鉴于涉及事项较多,相关交易方经慎重考虑并听取各方意见后,决定终止本次筹划。公司同时就终止事项给投资者带来的不便深表歉意。 此次控制权变更的筹划始于2026年7月底。7月31日,宝莱特公告控股股东正筹划可能导致控制权变动的重大事项,公司股票及可转债自8月3日起停牌,可转债暂停转股。8月4日,公司称因事项仍在推进中,预计无法按原计划于8月5日复牌,申请继续停牌不超过3个交易日。然而筹划最终未能成行,复牌即遭市场用脚投票。 公开资料显示,宝莱特主营医疗监护仪及相关医疗器械的研发、生产和销售,2

12 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC85 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

杞县丰农拟发行5亿元公司债 华福证券中标主承销商 2026年8月10日,杞县丰农农业投资有限公司公司债券主承销商采购项目中标结果正式揭晓,华福证券成功中标。 据招标信息显示,杞县丰农农业投资有限公司本次计划发行不超过5亿元公司债券,债券期限不超过5年。此次融资将有助于公司拓宽融资渠道、优化债务结构,为后续业务发展提供资金保障。 天眼查平台公开信息显示,杞县丰农农业投资有限公司成立于2023年7月,注册资本为3000万元,其控股股东为杞县国有建设投资发展有限公司。作为一家成立仅三年余的国有控股企业,该公司在农业投资领域的业务布局正逐步展开。华福证券此次中标后,将负责本次债券发行的承销工作,后续发行进展值得关注。

12 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

河南省公路工程局集团51%股权法拍挂牌 底价10.08亿元八折起拍 2026年8月10日,阿里司法拍卖平台显示,河南省公路工程局集团51%股权(共计51000万股)正式挂牌,底价定为10.08亿元,持有方为绿地城市投资集团。 该笔股权此前已质押于建设银行上海闵行支行,评估价值为12.60亿元,此次起拍价相当于评估值的八折。回溯至2019年1月,绿地城市投资集团以8.17亿元受让河南省公路工程局集团70%股权,随后推动管理层及员工持股计划,最终形成绿地持股51%、河南交投持股30%、管理层及员工持股19%的三元股权架构。 河南省公路工程局集团主营公路交通基础设施投融资建设与施工,拥有公路行业甲级设计资质、公路工程施工总承包特级资质,以及公路路基、路面、桥梁工程专业承包一级等多项高等级资质。 值得关注的是,此次并非该标的首次挂牌。2025年10月,河南省公路工程局集团51%股权曾以8.38亿元的底价进行法拍,最终因无人竞拍而

12 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC82 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

欧菲光澄清利益输送指控:否认向新菲光转移利润 8月9日晚,欧菲光发布澄清公告,回应媒体关于实控人蔡荣军通过新菲光和新思考掏空上市公司的报道。公司称已启动内部核查,确认报道内容不实。 公告显示,欧菲光未为新菲光代工光模块光学组件等产品,不存在压低售价转移利润情形。近三年双方仅发生2023年厂房出租关联交易,金额较小,定价公允。公司研发体系独立运行,不涉及WLG晶圆级玻璃等CPO核心工艺,研发成果均服务于自有业务,与新菲光、新思考无技术共享或专利通用。 针对新思考,欧菲光表示关联交易属正常经营所需,新思考系终端客户指定供应商,定价由客户主导,不存在人为调节。新思考为蔡荣军收购而来,非从欧菲光拆分,不存在“欧菲光承担研发成本、高毛利业务归新思考”的情形。 公司强调各独立运营,关联交易均已履行审议和披露程序,定价公允,不存在人员混同、利益输送或资金占用。针对不实报道,公司已报案并保留追究法律责任的权利。截至8月7日,欧菲光报7.

12 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC86 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

沙特TASI指数微涨0.05% 保险板块领涨 8月9日,沙特阿拉伯股市收高,TASI指数收盘微涨0.05%。保险业、水泥、农业和食品板块领涨。 成分股中,Mutakamela Insurance Co涨幅居前,大涨10.00%至14.19里亚尔;Wataniya Insurance涨9.92%收于15.18;Allied Cooperative Insurance Group涨9.88%报8.34。Arabian Contracting Services Company大跌9.96%至73.70,创历史新低;Sppc跌6.88%报8.12;Red Sea Housing跌5.29%收于22.92。市场涨跌互现,196只个股下跌,132只上涨,17只持平。 大宗商品方面,WTI原油9月期货跌0.27%至77.08美元/桶,布伦特原油10月期货跌0.34%报82.21美元/桶,黄金期货涨2.37%至4,401.30美元/盎司。

12 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC85 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

美日联手干预汇市力压日元 分析指协同行动扩大“弹药”规模 据美国银行全球研究部门分析,日本与美国于7月31日实施协调性日元买入干预,目标是将美元/日元汇率压至155以下——此前日本单边干预未能突破该水平。日本通常从13,000亿美元外汇储备中筹资,其中大部分以美国国债形式持有。但近期干预规模可能在三个交易日内超10万亿日元,财务省或需出售证券或借入美元。 美国银行指出,美联储FIMA回购便利工具允许外国当局以国债抵押借入美元,减少直接出售债券需要,但日本面临600亿美元交易对手限额,使用成本较高可能限制其运用。美国财政部可通过外汇稳定基金提供资金,据报道在7月干预中,美方出售欧元而非美元买入日元,若可用欧元储备紧张,后续或需直接进行美元/日元卖出操作。 此次协调干预在扩大储备“弹药”规模的同时,也释放出日本央行可能加快加息节奏或推进财政调整的信号。干预后分析师已将年底美元/日元汇率预测从152下调至149。

12 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC85 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

美银:7月CPI重要性远超非农 美联储加息预期不变 美国银行策略师指出,美联储对下周通胀数据的重视程度将超过周五疲软的就业报告。7月非农就业减少2.3万,前两个月合计下修10.3万;失业率降至4.1%,但劳动参与率滑落至61.4%。美银将就业数据定性为"整体略偏鸽派",但认为不足以改变9月开始加息的预测。 就业疲软集中在地方政府教育(-5万)及休闲酒店业(-4万),后者连续四个月中有三个月下滑,归因于油价上涨对休闲旅游的拖累。失业率下降系"不良"因素驱动——家庭就业减少8.7万,失业人数降幅更大达17.8万,劳动参与率下滑受年轻劳动者退出拖累。 美银认为,非农疲软、参与率下降与失业率走低并存,反映移民政策及人口结构相关的负向供给冲击。但薪资增速偏弱与这一逻辑不完全吻合,是"今日数据中最具鸽派意味的方面"。不过,美银认为该报告不应动摇美联储对劳动力市场总体平衡的判断,过去三个月平均就业增速3万人,仍高于2万人盈亏平衡水平。

12 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC86 viewsread 12 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 中国大事件/中文日记 📢 全球新闻聚焦 | 📣国际热点速报 📢 东南亚大事件 「新闻曝光」 📢 缅北大事件曝光 📢 Telegram-环球新闻时讯 📢 全球新闻事件 📢 【新事件】东南亚曝光l新闻l吃瓜🅥 📢 东南亚曝光吃瓜 新闻 📢 全球新闻大事件资讯🌐 📢 东南亚全域|热闻|吃瓜|曝光| ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

11 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC73 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

比特币跌破6.5万美元 现货ETF单周吸金11亿难阻市场担忧 8月9日,比特币交易价格跌破65,000美元,24小时小幅下跌0.28%至64,800美元。尽管美国现货ETF单周流入达11亿美元,创4月以来最强表现,但市场对BIP-110少数链停滞的担忧持续施压。 上周比特币ETF连续五日净流入8.535亿美元,贝莱德IBIT贡献6.937亿美元,富达FBTC新增1.164亿美元。以太坊现货ETF流入2.449亿美元,连续五周正流入,创2026年最长纪录。Galaxy Research数据显示Coldcard漏洞事件已致1,719枚比特币被盗(约1.11亿美元),总损失可能超1.3亿美元。 周末前市场需求降温,美国非农就业意外下降2.3万人,预期增加8万人,比特币ETF成交额下滑9%至81.9亿美元,为2024年10月以来第二低完整周成交总额。年初至今,比特币ETF累计净流出约44.4亿美元,以太坊产品净流出约8.73亿美元

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @CJXW2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“经济新闻 时政资讯 🌎” (@CJXW2), 9,961 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CJXW2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.