Channel

𝘾𝙮𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙤 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨™️

@CIDINT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

768subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002662167206
Type	Channel
Username	@CIDINT
Created	5 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	22 August 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/CIDINT

Growth

4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 759–769 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
22 Aug 2026, 00:23	768	+5
14 Aug 2026, 09:15	763	+3
7 Aug 2026, 02:51	760	no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:47	760	first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 5 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
❤	3	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 481,720 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝐂𝐈𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐓 🅲🆃🅵
@CidintCTF · 3493 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

𝐂𝐈𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐓 🅲🆃🅵
@CidintCTF · 3491 post 𝗖𝗜𝗗𝗟𝗔𝗕📡
@cidlab · 2971 post 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐒𝐞𝐜
@ethicsec · 111 post 𝐇𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐬
@HackingArticles · 491 post 𝗛𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗢𝗢𝗟𝗦™️
@hackingtoolshub · 2341 post 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐲𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐇𝐮𝐛
@IndianCyberhub · 51 post 𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗔𝗡 𝗖𝗬𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘™️
@IndianCyberIntelligence · 681 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘾𝙮𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙤 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨™️” (@CIDINT), 768 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CIDINT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.