Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🐳CHINESE CRYPTO WHALES GAMBLES 🎲🎲

Channel

🐳CHINESE CRYPTO WHALES GAMBLES 🎲🎲

@CHINESECRYPTOWHALESGAMBLES

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

38subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002547266666
TypeChannel
Username@CHINESECRYPTOWHALESGAMBLES
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CHINESECRYPTOWHALESGAMBLES

Growth

388561.510 August 2026 — 85 subscribers10 August 2026 — 85 subscribers17 August 2026 — 71 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58 subscribers1 September 2026 — 49 subscribers10 September 2026 — 46 subscribers18 September 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–92 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:0138-8
10 Sept 2026, 18:5746-3
1 Sept 2026, 19:1649-9
25 Aug 2026, 02:5558-13
17 Aug 2026, 19:3471-14
10 Aug 2026, 23:1485no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:1685first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

935 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23825.5%
🔥23625.2%
🎉23525.1%
22624.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 935 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jan 2026, 12:59 UTC129 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Attention, everyone❗️ New year means fresh chances ahead 💡 If you’re just joining this channel, consider yourself fortunate. I wrapped up a call with my elite insiders 🔝 We covered everything - last year’s successes, slip-ups, and our targets for this year. It seems 2026 will deliver tons of incredible opportunities, folks, leading to larger ventures, bolder goals, and massive returns 💹↗️ What’s next? 🤔 Folks, st

👍17🔥2

26 Dec 2025, 19:50 UTC272 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Echo Hound 是一個基於 X1 區塊鏈的非金融、跨時代 NFT 和序數驅動的敘事生態系統。其基礎是不可篡改的流動性、多重簽名控制的金庫以及參與驅動的通縮型鏈上機制——所有這些都在官方白皮書 v1.0 中進行了透明的文檔說明。 這裡沒有價格承諾、收益保證或投機性擔保。重點在於結構、治理紀律和長期敘事延續性,而非投機。生態系的完整結構、規則和生命週期已在置頂白皮書中詳細闡述。 📄 白皮書 v1.0:https://bafkreifeihdjqnk7xpfxfyy3l4xe6jf6syuy7woriof666d6moqh7kdzzm.ipfs.dweb.link/ 🔹 X:@echohoundx 🔹 Telegram:https://t.me/+axtvX9GbsnJkMGRh

1

18 Oct 2025, 08:10 UTC425 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔥 NEW GEM ALERT — $STALION 這款迷因幣將用於購買專屬 NFT,讓您有機會在現實世界中體驗精彩事物,例如在豪宅、遊艇和汽車上度過美好時光。隨著我們市值達到 1 億美元,我們將在全球購買資產。 CA 🔥: 2FNnQEezyPxDFvpvBZCLoT8WVW65pbH2ABX5GM6Rpump Chart: Dextools ✈️ https://t.me/+b-SopHn5ngY1YTIx ✖️ https://x.com/afonso_ensina Solana 新鮮出爐,蓄勢待發! 活躍的團隊 | 強大的社區推動 | 搶先體驗機會 $STALION 不容小覷——關注 Solana 的下一個推動者

🎉17👍10🔥107

17 Oct 2025, 23:39 UTC368 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026

0x14913a1236AB004dF1E2c80E7d39Ab2700Cf820A

👍12🎉109🔥8

10 Oct 2025, 17:12 UTC388 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔥 NEW GEM ALERT — $Win CA 🔥: GQ1g7bsLx6GBA2hni1hx7Zbypzf6xhoYxZp5NTshbonk Chart: Dextools ✖️: https://x.com/i/communities/1970918481613791415 Solana 新鮮出爐,蓄勢待發! 活躍的團隊 | 強大的社區推動 | 搶先體驗機會 $Win 不容小覷——關注 Solana 的下一個推動者

👍14🔥118🎉8

3 Oct 2025, 09:15 UTC388 views50 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

35x 13Mil mc 🔥 🔥 $1

🎉1513🔥12👍10

3 Oct 2025, 08:53 UTC448 views110 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

LIKES 代幣由 Main Street 背後的開發者創建。 它基於 Solana 構建,旨在促進社交媒體平台的互動,為加密貨幣行業的營銷團隊提供記賬單位和交易媒介。 CA: A6VYKKUx8EYVMpbrLY2kn2cD6bqnpVaJosRSujqQ1wxN 立即在 Jupiter 和 Axiom 上交易 LIKES 代幣。 將它發送給您的粉絲,提升您的影響力。 加入社區,為您的作品贏得點讚。

🎉3731🔥23👍19

3 Oct 2025, 02:26 UTC357 views54 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔥 $1 12x 4.5M mc 🔥

21🎉13🔥12👍8

3 Oct 2025, 01:58 UTC363 views60 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔥 $4 (Hacker) 142x 170Mil mc at ath 🔥

18👍17🔥15🎉10

2 Oct 2025, 21:02 UTC371 views53 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Boom $1 7.5x 2.9M mc

🔥2610👍10🎉7

2 Oct 2025, 13:16 UTC359 views42 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Update $4 (BSC) 60x+ Pinned in chat earlier. Risky degen, dyor. https://x.com/i/communities/1973250438989246558 0x0A43fC31a73013089DF59194872Ecae4cAe14444

👍13🎉119🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CHINESECRYPTOWHALESGAMBLES. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🐳CHINESE CRYPTO WHALES GAMBLES 🎲🎲” (@CHINESECRYPTOWHALESGAMBLES), 38 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CHINESECRYPTOWHALESGAMBLES.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.