Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CHESS PAGE - صفحه شطرنج

@CHESSPAGE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,115subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672478212
TypeChannel
Username@CHESSPAGE
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CHESSPAGE

Growth

1,1131,1151,1147 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,115 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,113–1,115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:171,115+2
7 Aug 2026, 20:471,113no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:331,113first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 1,115 subscribers
Avg views / post
244
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.467%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total1,220
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
888.9%
🔥111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔻 توصیه های استاد بزرگ سوزان پولگار - ۱۵ همیشه سعی میکنم کارها را بگونه ای درست انجام دهم. حتی وقتی خیلی سخت و برخلاف میلم باشند. #اندیشه_بزرگان_شطرنج @CHESSPAGE

1

17 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC312 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔻۵ روش موثر برای بهبود تمرکز و بایدها و نبایدها ▫️بخش آخر ▪️عوامل حواس پرتی را محدود کنید. هر کدام از ما حواس پرتی های درونی یا بیرونی داریم. حواس‌پرتی‌های بیرونی ممکن است برای خانم‌ خانه داری که در منزل با چند بچه و حیوانات خانگی سروکله میزند و یا همسری دارد که گیتار الکتریک می‌نوازد چالش برانگیز باشد ضمنا حواس‌پرتی‌های درونی نیز ممکن است برای افراد مجرد مبتلا به اختلالات یادگیری و یا افرادی که استرس‌های شدیدی در

15 Jul 2026, 04:58 UTC290 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔻۵ روش موثر برای بهبود تمرکز و بایدها و نبایدها ▫️بخش ۲ برای رسیدن به تمرکز باید از چه چیزهایی حذر کرد؟ ۱-انجام هم زمان چند کار اغلب فکر میکنیم که انجام هم زمان چند کار زمان ما را ذخیره می کند و باعث افزایش بهره وری می گردد ولی برعکس آن صادق است. انجام هم زمان چند کار مغز ما را دچار تنش و گیجی می کند و با زیاد شدن اشتباهات؛ بهره وری ما افت می‌کند. ۲- نوتیفیکیشن پلتفرم های اجتماعی نوتیفیکیشن تمام وسایل ارتباطات

14 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔻۵ روش موثر برای بهبود تمرکز و بایدها و نبایدها ▫️بخش ۱ شما تنها فردی نیستید که به راحتی حواس‌تان پرت می‌شود یا نمی‌توانید تمرکز کنید. طبق نظرسنجی اخیر انجمن روانشناسی آمریکا، تقریباً از هر پنج بزرگسال، دو نفر گزارش داده اند که وقتی استرس دارند، نمی توانند کارشان را درست انجام دهند و استرس باعث فراموشی شان شده؛ بر توانایی تمرکز و قدرت تصمیم گیری شان تأثیر می گذارد. به عنوان یک ملت، ما بیش از هر زمان دیگری تحت استر

14 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC172 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Body and Mind (1) 5 Effective Ways to Improve Concentration and Cognition What to do and not do to become less stressed and more focused at work and home. February 13, 2023

13 Jul 2026, 04:59 UTC197 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔻ستارگان سینما در حال بازی شطرنج ▫️عکس ۲۵ ▫️دیوید بویی و کاترین دنو در پشت صحنه فیلم "گرسنگی" محصول سال ۱۹۸۳ دیوید را یکی از تاثیرگذارترین موزیسین های قرن بیستم می شناسند.او پس از تحصیل در رشته های هنر؛ موسیقی و طراحی از سال ۱۹۶۳ و با ترانه "شگفتی فضا" کار خود را آغاز و در سال ۱۹۷۲ با آلبوم "ظهور و سقوط زیگی استارداست و عنکبوت‌ها از مریخ" به اوج محبوبیت رسید. بویی در سال ۱۹۷۶ با فیلم متفاوت "مردی که به زمین سقوط کر

12 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC167 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Konstantin Khabensky as Viktor Korchnoi @CHESSPAGE

1

12 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC178 viewsread 7 August 2026

در مسابقات کاندیداتوری سال ۱۹۸۰، کورچنوی ابتدا مقابل بوریس اسپاسکی قرار گرفت و با پیروزی ۷/۵_۱۰/۵ به مرحله بعد صعود کرد. او در یک چهارم نهایی مقابل پتروسیان قرار گرفت که آن رویارویی را هم با نتیجه ۳/۵_۵/۵ پیروز شد. در سوی دیگر، پولوگایفسکی با غلبه بر میخائیل تال (با نتیجه ۲/۵_۵/۵) به مرحله یک چهارم نهایی صعود کرد و در آنجا نیز پورتیش را ۴/۵_۶/۵ شکست داد و به نیمه نهایی راه یافت. کورچنوی و پولوگایفسکی توافق کردند

12 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC145 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔻رویارویی در روشنایی نئون ▫️بخش آخر ما موفق شدیم بار دیگر شاهد جادوی سینما و دیدن سکانس بازی های فینال کورچنوی مقابل پتروسیان و پولوگایفسکی به عنوان بخشی از مسابقات کاندیداتوری باشیم. در این کار فیلم نامه نویسان تلاش کرده اند تا ظرایف یک اثر فاخر سینمایی را به بهترین وجه ممکن و با استفاده از پوستر حرفه ای، گریم، لباس، صحنه آرایی و تغییر چهره بازیگران بازتولید کنند. دیمیتری اولینیکوف که در تمام صحنه های مربوط به بازی

11 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC180 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔻کنستانتین خابنسکی بازیگر نقش ویکتور کورچنوی در حال تماشای شطرنج بازی کردن عوامل فیلم #شطرنج_هنر @CHESSPAGE

11 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔻رویارویی در روشنایی نئون ▫️بخش ۲ فیلم" قهرمان جهان" به نوبه خود تمام شاخص های یک اثر سینمایی موفق را داراست. عوامل ساخت آن، به کارگردانی 'الکسی سیدوروف"، در روایتِ داستانِ فیلم از یک توالی زمانی مشخص از رویدادها پیروی کرده‌اند و در عین حال فضای زیادی برای بروز خلاقیت بوجود آورده‌اند. سیدوروف می گوید:«شطرنجبازان حرفه ای بدون شک بعضی از لحظات فیلم را بحث برانگیز می دانند. یکی از بازیکنان حرفه ای جهان شطرنج تا حد زی

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CHESSPAGE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 649,260 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CHESS PAGE - صفحه شطرنج” (@CHESSPAGE), 1,115 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CHESSPAGE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.