19 Jun 2026, 04:06 UTC≈24,100 views360 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video
#缅甸婴儿 #缅甸小宝宝 #缅甸虐童 #缅甸虐待儿童 #缅甸虐婴 #缅甸小宝宝被打 缅甸越南小宝宝被打的视频 看了好窒息啊！这还是父母吗？
🤬308❤10👍7🤣7🤯7🖕5😁5😡5
Channel
吃瓜群众126东南亚新闻曝光
@CG126
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,741subscribers
+46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002734283149 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CG126 |
| Description | 🍉吃瓜，是一种生活态度。 🤝广告合作联系 @CG10086_bot 👥也可群里留言 @CG12369 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CG126 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 5,741 | +37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 5,704 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 5,695 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 133
- Videos
- 116
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12m 54s
- Average length
- 3m 14s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
434 reactions across 6 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 308 | 71.0% | |
| ❤ | 75 | 17.3% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 2.07% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 1.61% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 1.61% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 1.61% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 0.922% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 0.691% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.461% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 434reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
16 Jun 2026, 04:58 UTC≈25,100 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video
#张陶青死刑 #缅甸审判 电诈头子张陶青被缅甸佤邦联邦第一特区公审，张陶青被押解受审，判决死刑后他却不停喊着“不服、不服气”。缅甸佤邦联邦第一特区公审张陶青被押解受审，判决死刑后他却不停喊着“不服、不服气”。
❤8
28 May 2026, 15:14 UTC≈21,000 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
#全网悬赏 #通缉令 悬赏公告： 姓名：刘锴 户籍：江西 护照号：EP3194492 此人联合他人盗取公司资源，贪污公款，诈骗同事血汗钱！造成公司损失超1000万u，目前此人已逃往 #马来西亚，人在新山。 现全网重赏： 悬赏主犯刘锴，砍下一只手10万u，两只手20万u。其他从犯，执迷不悟，后果自负！ 可担保上压，悬赏长期有效，绝不赖账 ！欢迎各大媒体、自媒体转发！ 赏金联系人 @fy8765
❤23😁3
25 Jan 2026, 02:36 UTC≈28,300 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
近期随着诈骗园区被拆，许多中国公民睡在中国驻柬埔寨大使馆外，等待救援。
❤12🤡3😁1
27 Dec 2025, 01:52 UTC≈32,200 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video
#泰柬局势 柬埔寨波贝诈骗园区多栋建筑插上了五星红旗，企图防止泰军轰炸！
❤2👏1🤔1
18 Dec 2025, 07:39 UTC≈34,200 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video
#出租车 #出租车后排 #出租车视角 #高中生情侣 #高州四中 #高州第四中学 高州四中学生情侣在网约车后排亲密视频！完全不顾司机的存在！
❤20
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @CG126. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 552,988 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜群众126东南亚新闻曝光” (@CG126), 5,741 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CG126.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.