Channel
@CFO_consultants
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
324subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002578374335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CFO_consultants |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CFO_consultants |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 324 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 323 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 326 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 327 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 328 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 328 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
115 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 31 | 27.0% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 21.7% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 15.7% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 6.09% | |
| custom 5413408850399217933 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.87% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣 Тема дня 😡Как один отчет чуть не рассорил финансистов и коммерсантов. Хотите знать какой? Почему? И как мы избежали не просто конфликт, а даже стали друзьями? Наберём 10🔥, и я подготовлю всю информацию❤️
🔥14
Мысль дня: Нищета от слова не считать! ➡️ Не считаешь себестоимость — работаешь в минус. ➡️ Не считаешь дебиторку — работаешь на клиента. ➡️ Не считаешь оборачиваемость — работаешь на склад. ➡️ Не считаешь кассовый разрыв — работаешь на банк. Богатый считает не потому что жадный. А потому, что деньги любят порядок и счет. И тут не важен уровень и отрасль бизнеса🤎 💡Продаёте ли вы кофе или нефть. 💡Только начали ил…
💯3🔥2👍1
🎬 Частый вопрос получаю: Как разделить не просто PL проектов/юнитов, а ещё и их фин.потоки в рамках одного ЮЛ? Только через открытие разных счетов или выводом разных статей. Но при этом если есть немало общих расходов, эта история не работает. Важно: не делите общие расходы на разные платежки ради проектов. Это максимальная глупость Выводы по эффекту нужно вести по PL🥳
👍2❤1💯1
😁
😁2💯1
Принцип Стокдейла. Слыхали о таком? А он есть. А как он связан с финансами? Прямо! Даже если в жизни вы большой оптимист, как и я💃. Никогда на свои финансы не смотрите также. Особенно в кризис, из которого мы не выйдем никогда, лучшее управление финансами - это всегда держать рядом худший сценарий.
💯2❤1👍1
Мысль дня: Есть 2 типа собственника: 1. Те, кто вкладывает в бизнес. Порой, последнее. 2. Те, кто тащат из него больше полученного. Это как купить дорогую вещь и жить на дошираке. Бизнесмен ли последний?
💯3👍1🤩1
Все время забываю указывать, что я ещё как могу транслирую все в Max🙈. Финансы в бизнесе
👍1
Пример расчета чувствительности EBITDA к изменению % маржинальности и % выполнения плана продажа. Иными словами, чтобы сохранить Ebitd: Норма - это план. Опустив маржу на 1%, необходимо выполнить выручку не менее чем на 110%. И тд Чтобы хоть что-то не потерять при невыполнении выручки, считать необходимо в обратную сторону и определять, какой маржой в абсолюте вы готовы пожертвовать, чтобы не потерять ее еще больш…
✍2👍1custom 54134088503992179331
❓Недавно в разговоре затронули важную тему: в розничном сетевом бизнесе % маржинальности — это не показатель эффективности🤩И его падение - это нормально. 😶 Ключевой ориентир — это валовая прибыль в деньгах, которая не должна падать ниже плана, независимо от того, как вы выполняете план по выручке. И мое мнение - и ДА, и НЕТ. Здесь очень тонкая грань. И чтобы не уйти в крайности, каждый случай нужно разбирать отдель…
❤2🔥1custom 54134088503992179331
К вопросу выше, что думаете друзья?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Друзья, привет🫸 Недавно у меня был спор. Что важнее или, так сказать, эффективнее: 1. падение % маржи или рост выручки? 2. и на что при таком дисбалансе нужно смотреть ещё? 3. какой KPI ставить ком.диру? Друзья, как думаете? Поделитесь мыслями📣⬇️
❤1
🪿 Друзья, сегодня разберем, что такое юнит-экономика и зачем ее считать.👍 Раньше к юнит-экономике относили просто себестоимость товара. Сейчас — это всё, что можно разбить на атомы🔄: магазины, услуги, товары, каналы, клиенты… Иными словами - это любой объект дохода. И его обязательно!!!! нужно просчитывать до финансового результата. ❣️Более того, в одном бизнесе их может быть несколько сразу, например: каналы- мага…
❤2👍2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CFO_consultants. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
К вопросу выше, что думаете друзья?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CFO_consultants named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Финансы в бизнесе | Шикова Елена” (@CFO_consultants), 324 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CFO_consultants.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.