Channel
CE-CELL LEADERS FORUM🇬🇭
@CECLF
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,822subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001668412294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CECLF |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CECLF |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:07 | 2,822 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:40 | 2,823 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 2,827 | +2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 2,825 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 2,823 | -8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 2,831 | +3 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:01 | 2,828 | +2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 2,826 | -3 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 2,829 | -4 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 2,833 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 2,835 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:02 | 2,837 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 2,837 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 2,835 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SpiritResults · 24,230
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
@Femilazarusmessages · 90,236
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CE-CELL LEADERS FORUM🇬🇭” (@CECLF), 2,822 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CECLF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.