Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 成都修车·抖阴集团已验车库

Channel

成都修车·抖阴集团已验车库

@CDdyxcck

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

23,910subscribers

-2,251 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002048250926
TypeChannel
Username@CDdyxcck
Description聊天群 https://t.me/CDdyxcjt
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CDdyxcck

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@LotteryNavChannel888/9025 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC@CDdyxcck/2289 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@LotteryNavChannel888/9045 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC@CDdyxcck/2290 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@LotteryNavChannel888/92822 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC@CDdyxcck/2347 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@LotteryNavChannel888/99627 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC@CDdyxcck/2412 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@LotteryNavChannel888/10159 Nov 2026, 03:42 UTC@CDdyxcck/2417 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 03:42 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@LotteryNavChannel8885 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@LotteryNavChannel888 (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @LotteryNavChannel888. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,61226,28418,94823,9106 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net -2,251. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,411–28,485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 09:5123,910+128
10 Nov 2026, 08:3623,782+10,128
8 Nov 2026, 17:1913,654+84
7 Nov 2026, 08:2813,570-11
6 Nov 2026, 10:3513,581+139
5 Nov 2026, 11:1613,442+218
4 Nov 2026, 08:2513,224+111
3 Nov 2026, 10:5913,113+70
2 Nov 2026, 08:1513,043+163
1 Nov 2026, 10:1012,880+38
31 Oct 2026, 07:1612,842+157
30 Oct 2026, 07:0812,685+142
29 Oct 2026, 10:0912,543+286
28 Oct 2026, 05:1512,257+141
27 Oct 2026, 04:2612,116-5
26 Oct 2026, 01:0812,121+39
24 Oct 2026, 22:5612,082-46
24 Oct 2026, 02:0712,128+35
23 Oct 2026, 05:0812,093+41
22 Oct 2026, 04:0712,052first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.59%
avg views ÷ 23,910 subscribers
Avg views / post
857
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.221%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held30 (16 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total7,716
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,740
Videos
≈123
Links
≈416

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2288.0%
👍312.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 23:34 UTC93 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

【成都修车·抖阴集团已验车】 编号: 278 艺名:#曼依 地址: #交子大道 价格:# 6/9 类型: #颜值车 #御姐 #69 #感觉车 #身材车 联系: @Emma_520 验证: 报告1 特点: 老师是北方妹子,颜值可以打9.5分非常顶,真人全妆跟照片无差,胸B+,身材苗条全身无赘肉,皮肤光滑,有正反面服务跟菜单一致,口技很好,可以站立吹箫和69,炫批选手不能错过,小穴蝴蝶粉嫩紧致多汁无异味,爱爱反馈真实,在众多开6的老师中算是颜值天花板了。 聊天群: https://t.me/CDdyxcjt

9 Nov 2026, 03:42 UTC440 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🎰 07 嫩M 林知柚 送福利咯 📮 参与条件: 🛡️ 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-成都修车•抖阴集团 └💬 发言数大于 5 条 🎫 加入-成都修车·抖阴集团已验车库 🎫 加入-成都回寝的诱惑(复活版) └💬 发言数大于 5 条 🎫 加入-成都 林知柚日常碎片 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 18口令红包 x 6 💰️ 100优惠券 x 3 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 现金红包24小时联系。优惠券有效期7天。 📆 定时开奖 北京时间:2026年11月15日 15时38分 👉 点击参与抽奖 🎁 点击查看更多抽奖

❤1

7 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC573 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🎰 楚老师送福利啦 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 现金兑换24小时内联系。优惠券7天内联系.换号无效, 🎅 联系领奖:@jiaQ2723557609aaa 🙋 参与人数:392 中奖名单如下: 1. 金智秀的前男yǒ 奖品:88口令 2. 今晚八零后 奖品:28口令 3. 紫菜蛋花汤 奖品:28口令 4. 迷龙 奖品:28口令 5. 有你真好 奖品:100优惠券 6. 天线嘚嘚 奖品:100优惠券 7. 李娅 一 奖品:100优惠券 这次没中,下次一定! 🎁 点击查看更多抽奖

❤2

29 Oct 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

【成都修车·抖阴集团已验车】 编号:留给上牌管理填写 艺名:#成都花花抓龙筋 地址: #成华区 价格: 套三 898 类型: #嫩妹车 #蛇蛇精 #恋爱感 #女友感 #服务车 #代聊 #抓龙筋 联系: @cdzlj6 验证: #已验证 验证报告 锐评:老师长得还是不错,跟照片8分像,没体验过抓龙筋的可以试试,服务项目还挺多的,菜单上的都做完了,妹子身材也好,胸摸起手感很巴适,妹子也比较会聊天,整体体验不错。 免费上牌联系: @wc1000glsjsa 成都修车·抖阴集团主群

27 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,070 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🎰 楚老师送福利啦 📮 参与条件: 🛡️ 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-成都 楚依依 天府三街 🎫 加入-成都修车•抖阴集团 └💬 发言数大于 5 条 🎫 加入-成都回寝的诱惑(复活版) └💬 发言数大于 5 条 🎫 加入-成都修车·抖阴集团已验车库 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 88口令 x 1 💰️ 28口令 x 3 💰️ 100优惠券 x 3 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 现金兑换24小时内联系。优惠券7天内联系.换号无效, 📆 定时开奖 北京时间:2026年11月07日 14时31分 👉 点击参与抽奖 🎁 点击查看更多抽奖

❤1

22 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

【成都修车·抖阴集团已验车】 编号: 艺名:#林知柚 地址: #天府三街 价格:#700p #1200pp 类型: #嫩妹车 #态度车 #女友感 #蛇 #颜值车 #大长腿 #萝莉 #jk 联系: @zhiyou18 验证: #已验证 锐评:老师裸身高163左右,体重应该有80斤,人照一致,频道自拍照,去除美颜就是本人,颜值身材在线的嫩妹,态度不错,甜美jk女友,情商高,皮肤白滑嫩,三件套➕蛇,适合喜欢吃颜值感觉控的兄弟们 成都修车·抖阴集团主群

20 Oct 2026, 04:33 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

【成都修车·抖阴集团已验车】 编号: 艺名:#于晚晚 地址: #市中心 价格:#800p #1300pp 类型: #御姐车 #服务车 #角色扮演 #巨乳 #匈奴人 #舔脚心 #锦江区 联系: @yuwanwan5201314520 验证: #已验证 锐评:10张的于晚晚老师身材确实真实一绝,服务也是很全面,深🐒口技值得体验,角色扮演也是很奈斯。这个大🔠真的值得大胸🐺友前来打卡体验,老师不经桩,享受做爱的过程才是最完美。 免费上牌联系: @wc1000glsjsa 成都修车·抖阴集团主群

18 Oct 2026, 22:56 UTC980 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

【成都修车·抖阴集团已验车】 编号:留给上牌管理填写 艺名:#阮星禾 地址: #天府三街 价格:6P 10PP 类型: #嫩妹车 #蛇蛇精 #自聊 #舌吻 #水萧 #裸口 #jk #萝莉 #包时 #夜 联系: @xinhe18 验证: #已验证 验证报告 锐评: 人照一致,9分,颜值耐看,没有纹身, 皮肤白嫩 下面很紧, 满满胶原蛋白 态度好,配合度高 jk小萝莉,喜欢嫩妹的放心冲 免费上牌联系: @wc1000glsjsa 成都修车·抖阴集团主群

16 Oct 2026, 04:40 UTC≈1,090 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【成都修车·抖阴集团已验车】 编号:留给上牌管理填写 艺名:#李元熙 地址: #天府三街 价格:6P 9PP 类型: #嫩妹车 #蛇蛇精 #自聊 #69 #舌吻 #水萧 #裸口 联系: @liyuanxiya 验证: #已验证 验证报告 锐评: 冷白皮 皮肤紧致 满满胶原蛋白 爱爱配合 体力出众 女上疯狂 免费上牌联系: @wc1000glsjsa 成都修车·抖阴集团主群

❤3

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC181 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🎰 楚依依老师夏日福利 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 换号无效。现金兑奖时间24小时。优惠卷兑奖时间7天。 🎅 联系领奖:@jiaQ2723557609aaa 🙋 参与人数:444 中奖名单如下: 1. 你是我们的兄弟 奖品:口令100 2. 成都省路人甲 奖品:口令50 3. Siddharthsingh 奖品:口令50 4. 啥子 奖品:楚老师1米优惠卷 5. 凡骨问道 奖品:楚老师1米优惠卷 6. Alan 奖品:楚老师1米优惠卷 这次没中,下次一定! 🎁 点击查看更多抽奖

22 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎰 楚依依老师夏日福利 📮 参与条件: 🛡️ 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-成都回寝的诱惑(复活版) └🎟️ 发言数大于 6 条 🎫 加入-成都修车•抖阴集团 └🎟️ 发言数大于 6 条 🎫 加入-成都 楚依依 天府二街 🎫 加入-成都修车·抖阴集团已验车库 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 口令100 x 1 💰️ 口令50 x 2 💰️ 楚老师1米优惠卷 x 3 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 换号无效。现金兑奖时间24小时。优惠卷兑奖时间7天。 📆 定时开奖 北京时间:2026年09月02日 19时00分 👉 点击参与抽奖 🎁 点击查看更多抽奖

21 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC869 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

【成都修车·抖阴集团已验车】 编号:留给上牌管理填写 艺名:#结衣 地址: #成华区 #理工大 价格: #4P #7PP 类型: #4P #自聊 #少妇车 #态度车 #服务车 #良家感 #成华区 联系: @HHA686800 验证: #已验证 验证报告 锐评:人照8分,微微胖,良家感强,态度好,胸大柔软。口活好,爱爱反馈真实不做作。 免费上牌联系: @wc1000glsjsa 成都修车·抖阴集团主群

❤3👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @CDdyxcck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CDdyxcck edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @CDdyxcck as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“成都修车·抖阴集团已验车库” (@CDdyxcck), 23,910 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CDdyxcck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.