Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сиделки в чатах пепеленда

Channel

Сиделки в чатах пепеленда

@CD_lki

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,356subscribers

-127 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001287331794
TypeChannel
Username@CD_lki
DescriptionПредложка: @pwcommunitybot
Created24 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CD_lki

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

9,460 average views per post against 8,370 subscribers — an engagement rate of 113.0%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled198,700
Mature posts only113.0% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,370 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1%
Position in cohort99.500th percentile · 8.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.064% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,3568,4858,420.56 August 2026 — 8,483 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,481 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,482 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,485 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,483 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,472 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,463 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,451 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,452 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,450 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,445 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,451 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,449 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,439 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,428 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,411 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,405 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,394 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,392 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,386 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,374 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,372 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,370 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,362 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,356 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net -127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,337–8,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 14:488,356-6
7 Nov 2026, 12:098,362-8
4 Nov 2026, 05:278,370-2
1 Nov 2026, 10:158,372-2
29 Oct 2026, 14:068,374-12
26 Oct 2026, 07:408,386-6
23 Oct 2026, 01:268,392-2
19 Oct 2026, 16:568,394-11
16 Oct 2026, 06:118,405-6
12 Oct 2026, 21:088,411-17
6 Oct 2026, 20:188,428-11
30 Sept 2026, 00:018,439-10
15 Sept 2026, 16:198,449-2
11 Sept 2026, 13:418,451+6
6 Sept 2026, 16:208,445-5
1 Sept 2026, 21:348,450-2
29 Aug 2026, 13:578,452+1
26 Aug 2026, 21:268,451-12
23 Aug 2026, 13:498,463-9
19 Aug 2026, 14:168,472first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.1%
avg views ÷ 8,356 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,950
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held65 (19 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total208,910
Reactions total21,432
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,630
Videos
≈1
Links
≈4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

69,395 reactions across 65 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24,61635.5%
🔥12,74418.4%
😭4,4946.48%
😨3,6735.29%
🐳3,4695.00%
💅2,6563.83%
🍓2,4713.56%
😁1,7882.58%
❤‍🔥1,5062.17%
👍1,4432.08%
🤣1,1511.66%
🙏1,0041.45%
🎄9791.41%
🤓8991.30%
😱8211.18%
🍾8051.16%
💘8011.15%
👏5880.847%
🤔4930.71%
✍4250.612%
36 further kinds2,5693.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69,395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 65 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CD_lki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,160 views531 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤373🔥66🤷‍♂42😨18👎10❤‍🔥7🙏5🥰4

9 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC≈3,970 views947 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤679🔥127❤‍🔥66🫡33🐳13😭12👎5😨5

7 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC≈6,050 views988 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💅652🔥182❤73😨39💯10😁10🥰9👀6

5 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC≈7,660 views1,022 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤719🤓181🔥80🥰9🐳8😭6👀5😨5

3 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC≈9,070 views1,218 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤770🔥172🥰104🫡64😨38😭35🙏14❤‍🔥9

1 Nov 2026, 11:34 UTC≈10,300 views1,457 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤1,020🔥270🎅96❤‍🔥17🥰15🐳10🍾9😁7

30 Oct 2026, 11:53 UTC≈10,800 views1,086 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘714❤‍🔥174🔥108🤣37❤18✍16🌭5🍓5

28 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC≈11,200 views1,239 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

отложка кончилась опять, писать сюда @pwcommunitybot

🔥929❤‍🔥142🎄72❤52😢18🐳8🌭7👻6

27 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC≈10,900 views893 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤639🔥141🐳66👍18🤣11🌭4🎄4🤯4

24 Oct 2026, 11:23 UTC≈12,100 views890 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤655🔥138❤‍🔥49🐳18😨12🎅6🌭4🍌3

23 Oct 2026, 11:27 UTC≈12,400 views1,035 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😨741❤158🤣67🔥26❤‍🔥11🌭8🙏8🐳6

22 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC≈11,000 views956 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💅638❤150💔83🔥35😨20😭15🐳8🤯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @CD_lki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сиделки в чатах пепеленда” (@CD_lki), 8,356 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CD_lki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.