Channel
@CDCweida
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
388subscribers
+282 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004376519656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CDCweida |
| Created | 8 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CDCweida |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 388 | +282 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 106 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,922 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CJ点评42 艺名: #芯儿 车牌：@xiner20070 CJ时间：秋高气爽的下午 综合评价：好像不知不觉和黄猫当了个同学。他给我说，妹儿瘦成一道闪电了。这个妹儿老人应该都有印象。当年号称年龄最小的3T，然后听说妹儿有点坦。现在已经是瘦成闪电了。妆容比较精致，和图一8分像。现在罩杯可能只有A+，皮肤很白，160左右的身高。三点正常色，有纹身，大腿处有胎记。不过逼很紧是真的。因为大部分客人都是做3T，加上少女的体质逼很紧。前戏时间长的话，水很多。口技比较棒，无齿感很舒服。3T采用后入式，我后入体力特别差，一边日一边摸她的逼逼水很多。这次日了挺久，体力不支，头脑发昏。事后抽了两支妹儿的烟，聊了会天。总之来说，嫩，排骨精，嫩妹里面情绪价值到位，3T体验还算不错。 最后补充：萝卜白菜，各有所爱。
这是一篇凸凸老师写给ly 阿伟的被cj 报告： 时间：6、12 地点：金楠天街 老师：@tutubabybb Ly: @aweihenyongde 刚结束了一份爱恋，在独自清空、忘却中等待起下一个炽热的身体艺术，期待起下一小时的灵魂摆渡。 到点遥控，开门迎面而来了阿伟哥哥，白T灰裤运动鞋背了个白色包包，干净清爽，好感度满满。我拉起他往屋里走，途中递给一袋漱口水，我们俩漱口完毕，闲聊起，他刚cj 完林宝，回味满满——初恋的味道。我一脸欣喜的望着他，大大的眼睛，一张娃娃脸，他说他好像有点混血…… 愉快的闲聊完毕，他先进入浴室试起水温，我挽起发缕随后到，水蒸气氤氲中，我们赤身相对，他欣赏起我的身体，我为他洗去疲惫。他指起我贴的蝴蝶纹身，对，蝴蝶🦋是我，我就是蝴蝶🦋，即将翩翩起舞萦绕在你的身体。 他躺在了那里，他不尴尬、不紧张、不确定。他就在那里，与我同在，因为此时我们彼此合适。我…
❤3
CJ点评10: 艺名:悦悦 车牌: @shenqingtian CJ时间:凉爽的夏日 综合评价:好兄弟，情绪价值很高。聊天能让你重证男人雄风。妆容精致，黄白皮。三点处，偏暗色。仔细检查了，逼上没有痣。身材挺好，曲线好，就是奶子小了点掌中宝。日感舒适，怕痒，可以弄得她痒痒，看她疯狂挣扎，配上她独特的叫床声有一种强奸好兄弟的快感。终于是把好兄弟私混到了床上，并且好兄弟请我吃了肯德基🍟。这种早已名声在外的老师，感觉无须多言！ 最后补充:萝卜白菜，各有所爱。
狠狠的给我炼💃
谁还记得这是谁？
CJ点评66 艺名:#小曲 车牌: @LZ35328 CJ时间:梦开启的时候 综合评价:初识小曲的时候，还是偶然听一位兄弟说起，刚好对湖南和南方的甜妹御姐有执念，开门见面的那一刻，甜甜的御姐少女，略带一丝新疆异域样貌，从见面的穿着还是一丝不挂时的接触，从皮肤到体香，从娇羞到熟悉。遭了...陷入爱河了。又是一个梦开始的地方！ 锐评：人照9分，163 90斤 B胸 身材紧致皮肤丝滑 最后补充: 萝卜白菜，各有所爱。
收拾好了心情，准备重新出发了。谢谢老频道各位看官的支持和喜欢，后续内容会搬运老频道现在还在开的老师和阿伟近期去的还不错的老师。以及一些电报往事个最新吃瓜。 伟大的事再次起航！
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @CDCweida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 891,809 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都阿伟的伟大的故事” (@CDCweida), 388 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CDCweida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.