Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐˜Š๐˜Š๐˜น๐˜Œ๐˜‹๐˜๐˜›๐˜š

Channel

๐˜Š๐˜Š๐˜น๐˜Œ๐˜‹๐˜๐˜›๐˜š

@CCxEDiTS

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

8,274subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001543666532
TypeChannel
Username@CCxEDiTS
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CCxEDiTS

Growth

8,27415 Aug 2026, 00:46 โ€” 8,274 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 15:44 โ€” 8,274 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 00:4615 Aug 2026, 15:44
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 8,266โ€“8,282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:448,274no change
15 Aug 2026, 00:468,274first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
12.8%
avg views รท 8,274 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.25%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held9 (27 July 2026 โ€“ 14 August 2026)
Views total9,561
Reactions total215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

215 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค6731.2%
๐Ÿ’ฏ3315.3%
๐Ÿ”ฅ3114.4%
๐Ÿซก3014.0%
๐Ÿ‘209.30%
๐Ÿ†146.51%
๐Ÿฅฐ136.05%
๐Ÿ•Š31.40%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ20.93%
๐Ÿ‘10.465%
๐Ÿค—10.465%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC125 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Happy Independence Day ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

โค10๐Ÿค—1

Signed Melbourne.82

13 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC467 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Kolkata Knight Riders are the clear favourite to have Hardik Pandya in IPL 2027. [Vaibhav Bhola]

๐Ÿ”ฅ16โค1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed Piyush ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท

12 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC652 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ashwin on next CSK Head Coach role: Eoin Morgan's name is strongly linked [to CSK head coach role, per his sources]. I think a decision will be made in the next week {On his YT channel)

๐Ÿฅฐ13

Signed Melbourne.82

12 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC697 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคโค๏ธ.

๐Ÿ†14โค7

Signed Melbourne.82

4 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTCโ‰ˆ1,280 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @thecricpixsPhoto

KOHLI CELEBRATIONS.

โค24โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Signed Melbourne.82

3 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTCโ‰ˆ1,280 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ.

โค13๐Ÿ•Š3

Signed Melbourne.82

30 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTCโ‰ˆ1,850 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ“ธ

๐Ÿซก30๐Ÿ’ฏ5โค3

Signed Melbourne.82

30 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTCโ‰ˆ1,550 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Happy Retirement Jinks ๐Ÿค.

๐Ÿ’ฏ28โค8

Signed Melbourne.82

27 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTCโ‰ˆ1,660 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @thecricpixsPhoto

Some Of The Greatest Moments๐Ÿฅถ

๐Ÿ‘20๐Ÿ”ฅ15โค1

Signed Melbourne.82

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @CCxEDiTS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,458,828 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tanay
@Tanay100 ยท 104,683
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here โ€” alongside 58 others โ€” read 15 August 2026
Manoj Maddy Edits
@manojmaddyedit ยท 92,445
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 30 here โ€” alongside 29 others โ€” read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐˜Š๐˜Š๐˜น๐˜Œ๐˜‹๐˜๐˜›๐˜šโ€ (@CCxEDiTS), 8,274 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CCxEDiTS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.