#网友投稿 兄弟们,现在到处都在打击诈骗,大环境越来越不好,真的不知道何去何从了 最近这段时间,感觉身边变化特别大。 以前很多人觉得还有机会,现在政策越来越严,打击力度越来越大,不少地方都关了,很多人失业,有的人回国了,有的人还在观望,也有人每天都在为下一步发愁。 我现在是真的很迷茫,不知道接下来该往哪个方向走 继续等,怕越等机会越少;换行业,又不知道自己还能做什么;回去重新开始,又担心一切都要从零起步 不知道有没有和我一样处境的兄弟? 你们现在都在做什么?有没有什么合法、稳定一点的发展方向可以推荐?或者有什么建议,也欢迎说说 不是想抱怨,只是站在人生的十字路口,突然发现未来变得很模糊。 希望听听大家的真实经历和看法,也许你的一句话,就能让我少走一点弯路 谢谢各位兄弟。 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888

Channel
东南亚华人圈/亚太/水沟谷/爆料一手资讯
@CCTV_XW
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,189subscribers
-328 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002095530919 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CCTV_XW |
| Description | 接招聘|平台|招商|实体店广告 商务合作 @shangwu6888 随时了解 水沟谷/苗瓦迪/曼谷资金新闻 中国管理,缅华,泰华,大马华人必备频道,给您分享 亚太城到曼谷的资金新闻 🇹🇭 亚太城官网 :www.yatai.vip 本平台已同步20+ 抖音反诈_记者 中缅泰大使馆 投诉服务 🇹🇭🇨🇳🇲🇲 #亚太城 #妙瓦低 #交克村 #三佛塔 #大其力 #波贝 #西港 #缅甸新闻 #柬埔寨新闻 #爆料 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CCTV_XW |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:09 | 27,189 | -72 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 27,261 | -56 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 27,317 | -83 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 27,400 | -59 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 27,459 | -58 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 27,517 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 27,517 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.43%
- avg views ÷ 27,189 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 388
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.49%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (30 July 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,270 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈20,300
- Videos
- ≈3,360
- Links
- ≈1,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友投稿 🇰🇭波贝中华食府附近有几十个宪兵在挨家检查,在附近的兄弟注意了。 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888
斯里兰卡纪念“世界打击贩运人口日”,政府呼吁社会各界加强合作,共同打击人口贩运并保护受害者。 在世界打击贩运人口日之际,斯里兰卡国防部秘书兼国家反人口贩运工作组主席、退役空军中将桑帕特·图亚孔塔(Sampath Thuyacontha)发表致辞表示,今年全球主题为“困于诈骗陷阱之后(Trapped Behind the Scam)”,重点关注有组织犯罪网络利用人口贩运受害者,从事网络诈骗和金融欺诈等犯罪活动这一日益严重的问题。 他指出,许多参与网络诈骗活动的人,本身也可能是人口贩运的受害者。他们往往是在遭受欺骗、威胁和胁迫的情况下,被迫实施犯罪行为。 图亚孔塔表示,斯里兰卡国家反人口贩运工作组将继续致力于: 预防人口贩运犯罪; 加强对受害者的保护; 强化案件调查和司法起诉; 协助幸存者重新融入社会。 他强调,打击人口贩运需要全社会共同参与,并呼吁公众携手维护人的尊严,支持受害者重建生活,同时彻底瓦解那些依靠剥削他人牟利的…
#网友投稿 腊戌五号 这人偷人家钱,被抓到了,他家里人还带人来闹 要让其给松绑滴滴,拍视频男的就说,你还没资格给他松绑,要等待有关部门来处理 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888
❤1
#网友投稿 🇰🇭西港亚多利赌场被一群本地人围住了,具体什么情况暂时不清楚 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888
#网友投稿 各位神通广大的网友么帮帮忙,看见我这个电动的告诉我一声,一架摩托125跟电动一架,两架一晚上被偷了。 摩托照片没有拍过,被偷的时候下着大雨3点到4点左右被偷了,那个时候我在喂小娃奶粉,也听不见,听见出去已经不在了。 三个年轻男人,有手有脚这种搞我们,本来就没钱,一直在苦奶粉钱,来木姐租房子在,现在去那里都只能走路了。 看见的联系我,到时候能找回来给你们一架125摩托,找不到能提供线索也行,线索能找到他们一点点头绪也可以,到时候给你们一点辛苦费,酬劳那些,主要是现在小偷太放肆了连口罩都不带了。 摩托是还好的,电动买来才骑了四个月左右的,电话:09264050070 09672255266 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888
#网友投稿 柬埔寨财通园区,曾经是电诈天堂,如今却像被风吹散的烟灰,一切来得太快,也太彻底。 当柬埔寨政府和警方正式宣布“打击电诈”专项行动后,园区内那些原本24小时灯火通明的楼宇,忽然黑了下去。曾经挤满狗推的长桌空了,耳麦散落一地,电脑屏幕还残留着最后一条未发出的诈骗脚本 曾经的业务骨干们,凌晨还在群里互相催单、PK业绩,如今已换上便装,拎着几个行李箱,排队挤进开往边境的破旧巴士。 曾经的“老板”们,也跑得比谁都快。别墅的车库大门彻夜敞开,咖啡杯还留在桌上,冰箱里半瓶红酒都来不及喝完。飞机群里最后一条消息停在“明天再议”,却再也没有下一句。 最讽刺的是,那些被忽悠到金边的普通年轻人,曾经以为只要“努力工作”,就能月入过万。有人把家里借来的路费花光了,才发现自己成了下一个受害者。有人想报警,却发现连自己都成了共犯。有人把护照交给“公司”保管,现在却连回家的身份证明都没有了。 财通园区曾经热闹非凡,像一座永不落幕的舞台。…
#小姐姐投稿 我是出台认识我现在的老公的。 我老公为什么选择我?因为我怀了他的孩子,而他家里的老婆没孩子。在他父母的要求下,他们离婚了。虽然和他结婚也生了二胎了,但是我老公一直防着我,却又不和我离婚,因为他觉得他离婚是因为我。 但是,我依旧做着夜场。最近一年的时间里,我也认识了几个大哥,平均每个大哥都给我30w人民币左右。 那是因为我实际95后,但是我和客人说我05后,客人很上头,压根不需要套路,只要人家喜欢你。 但是我老公喜欢捣乱,不然我可以赚得更多。 我现在最想去的地方是新加坡和澳大利亚,因为我觉得那里很安全。 我身边的姐妹说,东南亚的男人玩得精了,包养知道不直接给3wu了,而是分期付款。在一起的话继续给,不在一起也不吃亏。 甚至有那些男人,睡完也不给钱,甚至要好几天才给。说难听一点,你要是死在东南亚了,这个钱找谁拿?这可是东南亚耶,漂洋过海,千山万水。 想不给钱,少给钱,好几天才给钱,半个月才给钱的男人,真…
#网友投稿 当前有一群网络诈骗团伙藏匿于波贝 Longlong room for rent Poipet别墅出租屋 这群打野团伙之前曾驻扎在金边金泽园区,近期频繁转移窝点,希望有关部门关注此地方! 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888
#佤邦查获冒牌中国香烟 移交中方 佤邦司法委员会7月30日宣布,查获一批假冒中国品牌香烟,包括 云烟、红塔山 红河 及 金牛火炬 等,#并将制假设备一同移交中国。 声明称,这些香烟系冒用中国商标非法生产。此前,佤邦曾合法生产上述品牌香烟,2021年后逐渐停产,2023年“1027行动”后受中方打击力度影响,相关烟厂大多关闭。 佤邦方面表示,将继续与中方合作开展联合执法行动。 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888
#14岁缅甸少年在清迈遭Telegram诱拐 隔日于华富里安全获救 一名随父母居住在泰国清迈的14岁缅甸籍少年,通过Telegram被诱骗后失踪 泰国警方于今日(7月29日)在华富里府一家旅馆内将其安全找回。 据家属透露,该少年于7月28日上午携带护照、现金及黄金饰品离家。监控显示其在清迈长途车站乘车离开 虽曾通过SIM卡定位追踪至程逸府和达府,但随后信号中断,引发家属与警方高度担忧。 调查发现,少年通过Telegram群组被心理操控、挑拨与父母关系后出走,一天内已花费逾10万泰铢,家属怀疑涉及人口贩卖或卖淫集团诱骗 经警方追查,最终在华富里旅馆内寻回少年,当时同行一人已逃脱。 目前少年已移交父母带回曼谷,泰国警方正追查相关诱拐团伙,家属提醒公众警惕网络诱骗风险。 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 🪱订阅东南亚华人圈/爆料/吃瓜 😃 频道 链接 ➡️ @CCTV_XW 📱 商务/投稿 ➡️ @shangwu6888
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @CCTV_XW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 716,094 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚华人圈/亚太/水沟谷/爆料一手资讯” (@CCTV_XW), 27,189 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CCTV_XW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.