Channel
@CCTV1PH
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
103subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002569514233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CCTV1PH |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CCTV1PH |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 103 | -2 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 105 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 104 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 105 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 105 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 24 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2025 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
大马12名黑警勒索8名中国人价值20万令吉加密货币 雪州总警长：待完整报告后再定夺 雪州总警长拿督“沙兹里”表示：警方正等待12名警员涉嫌恐吓勒索8名中国男女、涉案金额价值20万令吉加密货币一案的技术报告，以便完成完整调查报告，并提交副检察司决定后续行动。 他在昨（13）日的记者会上称，由于案件涉及加密货币转账，警方需等待相关技术报告出具，进一步完善调查内容。 他表示，12名涉案警员目前仍在加影警区总部任职，但已被调离原岗位，调查期间禁止参与前线执勤。 此案发生于2月5日23时10分，地点位于加影绿野山庄一栋围篱双层独立洋房内。当时8名中国男女正在屋内休息，一批自称隶属于加影警区商业罪案调查组的警员突然上门突击检查。在无实质证据的情况下，对方坚称受害人涉及网络诈骗活动，并以此勒索价值约20万令吉的加密货币。 案发后，警方已逮捕12名警员协助调查，其中包括4名来自武吉阿曼商业罪案调查部网络战略及数字鉴证组的警员，涉案人…
#泰国新闻 曼谷市中心发生道路塌陷 总理奔赴现场 今天上午，曼谷市中心杜斯特区萨姆森路发生路面塌陷，造成地面出现一个30米宽、50米深的大坑。 泰国总理阿努廷赶赴现场，听取了曼谷市长和交通部官员的情况汇报。 ps：新总理的镜头感很好，看着边，咔嚓 ——————————————— 😍投稿：@DV044
❤1
#柬埔寨新闻 一起由5名男性嫌疑人（其中2人被捕）制造的“谋杀案”，嫌疑人在嫌疑人家门前的路上用刀刺伤受害者，造成1人死亡。 事发时间2025年9月22日16:30，地点在干拉省。 ——————————————— 😍投稿：@DV044
#柬埔寨 #缅甸 #骗子曝光 #跑路狗 现在在柬埔寨，之前在缅甸kk 欠公司13494u 骗我担保他出园区 然后直接跑路了说自己多牛逼怎么样，现在电话都不敢接了 ——————————————— 😍投稿：@DV044
#亚博 #开云体育 #公关部 #Eloise #LUNA #工号PR0087 输钱/被黑的会员、被吃掉的代理、被拉赔付的员工，进入亚博第二课先认识下领导公关部 我是叫你Eloise还是叫你现在的LUNA更亲切。 抗电击联系方式 @Wuzeizy，欢迎补充。 搞我兄弟的还是出来。 心情不错先给你打码晚上不联系我就直接全网发了，手上几十个19年前入职的高风险名单，我们来开个盲盒 ——————————————— 😍投稿：@DV044
❤1
希望有些公司真的能够有人性一点 我们公司在木牌，平时在公司大家都很努力，基本上每天上班都超过14个小时，为了公司的业绩，大家都在拼命。 就在昨天晚上，我的一个同事，接到了家里的视频电话，说，他的母亲病危快不行了，还有最后一口气吊着，让他赶紧回来，见他妈妈最后一面。 挂完电话，他十分的着急和难过，马上就去找主管请假，说要回国2天，因为，母亲病重的原因。 但是，主管就是不让他回去:说什么，现在回去不安全，可能出不来，现在国内查的严，又说现在是项目的关键时刻，回去不划算，说了一堆，见到这个同事还是执意的要回去，就说，回去可以，工资没有，提成没有，还要算赔付，等等。 最后没办法，这个同事，自己认赔2万U给公司，然后才能离开。 说实话，看到这个结果，真的很伤大家的心，大家在这个公司也做了好几个项目了，都是飞出来的，也没有找公司借支，给公司做了很多的业绩，从最开始的30个人，到现在的100个人，现在有同事的遇到了特殊情况，还搞的…
❤1
#网友曝光 #刘宇 原上海园区人事77 经常骗国内的人去公司上班，落地就是一万多的赔付，想走都只能喊家里人交高额赔付，不断压榨人头动不动就打人，经常发打人的视频图片，不知道是不是心理变态。 介绍人给他也是人落地之后钱不转，明吃人头。东南亚的各位公司注意了。 ——————————————— 😍投稿：@DV044
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @CCTV1PH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《今日新闻》” (@CCTV1PH), 103 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CCTV1PH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.