Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 深圳长安真实评价报告

Channel

深圳长安真实评价报告

@CABG00789

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9,286subscribers

-291 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003960572337
TypeChannel
Username@CABG00789
Description⬇️深圳长安所有频道群总入口链接⬇️ https://t.me/Changan8976 联系管理员: @ssss660066 联系管理机器人: @Changan68_bot
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CABG00789

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,8079,9479,3776 August 2026 — 9,577 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,568 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,559 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,694 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,786 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,650 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,464 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,458 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,467 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,413 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,794 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,640 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,586 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,830 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,656 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,887 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,735 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,632 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,403 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,947 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,744 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,202 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,807 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,536 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,286 subscribers9,2866 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net -291. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,636–10,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 14:549,286-250
6 Nov 2026, 13:059,536+729
3 Nov 2026, 10:318,807-395
31 Oct 2026, 02:219,202-542
27 Oct 2026, 15:499,744-203
24 Oct 2026, 05:559,947+544
21 Oct 2026, 01:369,403-229
18 Oct 2026, 03:019,632-103
15 Oct 2026, 10:379,735-152
12 Oct 2026, 07:199,887+231
5 Oct 2026, 06:029,656-174
26 Sept 2026, 08:189,830+244
15 Sept 2026, 05:219,586-54
11 Sept 2026, 14:019,640-154
6 Sept 2026, 18:189,794+381
2 Sept 2026, 04:439,413-54
30 Aug 2026, 03:349,467+9
27 Aug 2026, 06:359,458-6
23 Aug 2026, 23:339,464-186
20 Aug 2026, 10:449,650first reading

Engagement

127 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.41%
avg views ÷ 9,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
595
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 127 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held127 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total8,929
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
304
Links
325

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:17 UTC137 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:丑爷 学生TG: @reigp03 老师艺名:奶茶妹妹 老师TG: @milkteagirl07 出击时间:11.5 位置坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课费用:p 人照程度:人照9 服务内容:课表都有 出击详细体验: 一个相熟的老师找到我,说让我一定要去体验一下奶茶妹妹,赶上她康愈回深短开,果断约了头课,我是不拒绝bbw的,但资料里110多斤的体格还是让我有点发怵,直到见到真人,一切顾虑全部烟消云散,仅仅40分钟的激情让我意犹未尽,没约pp,大腿都给拍清了 1、人照一致,东北甜妹,夹子音,一句哥哥就让你酥麻半边,一身黑色蕾丝,体态匀称,一点也不胖,一对巨型车灯呼之欲出; 2、没有陪洗,是借着你沐浴的间隙,早已换好装备,丝袜情趣服装齐全,受不了,直接扑倒; 3、口活不错,一直口,准备了按摩油,做了胸推和乳夹,AV效果拉满; 4、进入奶茶的身体,一线通天,包裹紧实,对撞过程中一直不忘言语刺激,车灯晃的我缭绕,…

3 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC143 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

学生留名:🍀ABCD(建议留用户名增加真实度) 老师艺名:千雪 联系方式: @SzQianxue8 出击时间:11/01 位置坐标:#深圳 #宝安区 上课费用:8p 人照程度:8.5(满分10分) 服务内容:课表 出击详细体验: 二返。位置好停车,课室内部环境不错,有精心布置。小姐姐身材不错,细枝挂硕果,有腹肌,女上超绝。魅中有欲,从开始到结束整体都非常照顾体验和情绪,课表上的内容都有。服务态度满意。微肉,165左右,前突后跳,皮肤白! 推荐程度:9.2(满分10分) 老师或者学生提供了真实约课记录截图,关键信息会打码处理 提供了:✅ 未提供: 加入长安: https://t.me/Changan8976 提交报告给管理员: @Changan68_bot

3 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 13 November 2026

长安报告模板 学生留名:空空 学生TG: @southern009 老师艺名:林夏 老师TG:@linxia0922 出击时间:26.10 位置坐标:#深圳 #龙华区 上课费用:1500P 人照程度: 甜妹(满分10分) 服务内容:🐍 69 制服 水多多 出击详细体验: 上次状态不佳被秒 这次归来 我势必拿回属于我的一切 个人原因 我找小区门转了一圈😂 废了九牛二虎之力来到房间 房间很大沙发也很舒服 见面还是那个热情似火的林夏 刚坐到沙发上 妹妹就贴了上来 手也顺着身体探了下去 把小空空掌握在她的手中 上面是让人喘不过气的大蟒蛇🐍 2个人的身体马上就热了起来 迫不及待的解除掉衣服束缚 去洗白白 表扬一下这次的沐浴露 是比较大众的味道 不会特别的香 洗洗干净后 来到战场 妹妹仔细的亲吻小空空 让他迅速的一柱擎天 浴火难耐 迫不及待的戴上TT 本来妹妹还想女上起手 但是吸取教训的我 当然不能犯同样的错误 给妹妹摁在床上 从后面…

3 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC112 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:绝世好鸟 学生TG: @juuuuulaa 老师艺名:福田荔枝 老师TG: @ljhljh12 出击时间:2026-11 位置坐标:#深圳 #福田区 上课费用:900 人照程度:9(满分10分) 服务内容:洗催做 出击详细体验: 老师人照基本一致,就是美颜了。颜值中上。 大c奶,弹性,好吃,敏感 屁股很有弹性,好肉体 吃鸡鸡非常优秀,会转圈 而且很有耐心 做爱反应大,这点就是新人嫩妹好处。 这个价格是好货 绝世好鸟推荐 推荐程度:9(满分10分) 老师或者学生提供了真实约课记录截图,关键信息会打码处理 提供了:✅ 未提供: 加入长安(总导航⬇️) https://t.me/Changan8976 提交报告给管理员: @Changan68_bot

29 Oct 2026, 14:59 UTC183 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:梦境织影 学生TG: @STingLee2 老师艺名:南山小雅 老师TG: @xyxy11613 出击时间:10/28 位置坐标:#南山 #科技园 上课费用:700p工兵 人照程度:9分 服务内容: xcz+🐍吻 出击详细体验: 课室感觉是新课室,住的人比较少,相对安全。人照9分,妆容精致,脱衣后胸真大,没想到是小bbw我个人还挺喜欢这身材的。没有陪洗不过倒也无所谓啦,🐍吻真管饱了。口活有轻微齿感,应该是刚下海没多久还不太熟练,老司机可以来调教。整体态度还OK,切换几个姿势都很配合,后入的时候感觉很深很紧水很多,最后传教士边🐍边射的。这个价位还是比较合适的,很适合出击。推荐。 加入长安(总导航⬇️) https://t.me/Changan8976 提交报告给管理员: @Changan68_bot

29 Oct 2026, 14:57 UTC741 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:丑爷 学生TG: @reigp03 老师艺名:沐惋 老师TG: @fei02Z 出击时间:10月27号 位置坐标:#深圳 #福田区车公庙地铁站旁 上课费用:pp 人照程度:人照8 服务内容:课表都有 出击详细体验: 遥想还是2年前出击的老师,这次来个反食,人照8,没啥变化,身材依旧婀娜,咋有点甄嬛传安陵容的感觉…颜值这东西,萝卜青菜,反正我不吃颜,架不住老师的身材和170的大长腿,黑丝高跟的加持,不管是那种体位,视觉刺激还是在线的,按流程沐浴更衣,选情趣套装,接下来就是流程性的啊啊哦哦,还是要说下亮点,口活一流,整根包裹后还能持续打转,好不舒服,情趣套装任君选择,别看170大个,各种姿势还是可以轻松拿捏的,对撞激烈时,会翻白眼,有一种鬼畜的感觉,加之最近优惠活动多多,还是值得腿控们出击一下 推荐程度:(满分8分) 老师或者学生提供了真实约课记录截图,关键信息会打码处理 提供了:✅ 未提供: 加入长安…

27 Oct 2026, 17:22 UTC213 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:长空明月 学生TG: @SCLZYT 老师艺名:南山艺橙 老师TG: @FTyic1 出击时间:10.25 位置坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课费用:10P 人照程度:(满分10分) 9 服务内容:XCZ, 舌吻,69 出击详细体验: 近日加班劳累,小老二也跟着闲散了数日,恰逢周末,准备犒劳一下二弟。艺橙是群里推荐的名老师,上次晚上没约到,今天试试运气,一问老师正好有空,敲定时间便飞奔而去。见面人照9分,真正175模特身材,让我等南方小土豆压力山大,自惭形秽。老师好像看出了我的小紧张,温柔的让我坐到沙发上,闲聊几句,稍微缓解了一下激动的心情,手顺势在老师的大翘臀上摸了几把,然后迅速交上水费。老师拿来拖鞋引导我去浴室洗涮刷,来之前老师洗过了,没有陪浴,但洗完也会温柔的帮你擦背,还是挺暖心的。到床上干正事,老师开始三点口,不得不说口活技巧非常好,吸力很大,让小狼飘飘欲仙,舒服至极,差点就地交待了,所谓人间极…

23 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC255 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:长空明月(建议留用户名增加真实度) 老师艺名:南山奶昔 联系方式: @nannaixi 出击时间: 10.20 位置坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课费用:1100P 人照程度:(满分10分) 服务内容:鸳鸯浴,XCZ, Kiss, 69 出击体验: 二刷妹子,熟门熟路,课室在南山高端小区,不用登记,隐私性和安全性都很好。见面寒暄几句,四个月不见,妹子稍显陌生了,看样子还得多刷才能熟络,交上水费,妹子领我去浴室,全自动鸳鸯浴,洗的很仔细,有准备漱口水,一次性大浴巾,看的出来妹子比较爱清洁,课室也收拾得比较整洁,点赞👍。洗完跟随老师来到床上,开始正戏,有B面服务,背面指滑,🐍漫,做的像模像样,妹子说之前跟一个大姐学的,确实天赋很高,哈哈。B面之后反过来开始三点口,我告诉妹子我的胸敏感,妹子便听话的加强了刺激,老师的舌头软软的,舔的也特别舒服,小鸡鸡不由得膨胀起来,口活儿的时间也给的特别充足,不叫停不停。待差不多…

23 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC205 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:长空明月 学生TG: 老师艺名:福田小丽 联系方式: @xiaolianqq 出击时间: 10.23 位置坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课费用:10P 人照程度:(满分10分) 服务内容:XCZ, ,69 出击体验: 看隔壁群里推荐的嫩妹,说是大胸妹,看照片确实不错,决定去体验一下。科室在福田著名景点,但好在隐蔽性较好,安全性尚可。见面人照8分,稍微有点卡粉,其他差不多,脱掉衣服确实双明晃晃的大胸,形状也很好看,皮肤黄便白,综合来看是嫩妹,服务就是入门级,今天妹子说口腔溃疡没有提供口活儿,换做小狼给妹子服务了一番,好好把玩了一对绝世大奶,然后添了一下小穴,无异味,反馈很很强烈,然后戴帽开干,换了三个姿势,顺利出货。 总结:中规中矩的青春嫩妹,妹子自诉19岁,身材很好,胸控福音。 缺点:服务稍欠缺,喜欢服务系的狼友绕道。 推荐程度:7.5分(满分10分)值得打卡 老师或者学生提供了真实约课记录截图 提供了:✅…

22 Oct 2026, 12:48 UTC220 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

学生留名:Jacky 学生TG: @Jw0897 老师艺名:千雪 老师TG: @SzQianxue8 出击时间:10.21 位置坐标:#深圳 #宝安区 上课费用:8张 人照程度:8.5(满分10分) 服务内容:课表 出击详细体验: 着急泻火,想着就近出击,找了不太远的千雪老师。服务系老师服务态度没得说,洗澡认真,躺下后先是一套会所流程,然后正常调情。老师很敏感,摸着摸着就在抖了,后面她受不了了就自己带套坐上来了,下面能吸能夹一般人把持不住,一顿活塞运动后一起达到高潮。 老师情绪价值高,热情大方,喜欢大胸御姐服务系的应该喜欢这款。 推荐程度:9.2(满分10分) 老师或者学生提供了真实约课记录截图,关键信息会打码处理 提供了:✅ 未提供: 加入长安(总导航⬇️) https://t.me/Changan8976 提交报告给管理员: @Changan68_bot

22 Oct 2026, 05:48 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:丑爷 学生TG: @reigp03 老师艺名:#文静 联系方式:@asdp6616 出击时间:10.20 位置坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课费用:长安半价P 人照程度:(8.5分) 服务内容:课表都有 出击详细体验: 感谢长安群的体验券,这是周二的一号探店,拿到半价券火速预约,立马上门,原本以为是精神小妹,早就做好了心理准备,进门后,看见姑娘背对着躺在被子里,心里瞬间凉了大半,心想,又特么完犊子了,谁料到,妹妹蹭的一下从床上起身,热情的和我打招呼,打量一番,人照8.5,比照片年轻许多,带着大框眼镜,身着碎花小睡衣,活脱的邻家大学生的模样,分外清秀,稚气尤佳,和往常的御姐们形成了极大的反差,一个小时的时间里,交流自如,妹子也是细心主动,配合到位 1、人照8.5,学生妹打扮,165+,身材匀称,正常浅黄肤色,手脚好看; 2、标准36D天然双峰,饱满有弹性,手感极佳,年轻就是好啊; 3、全程主动,上来就🐍饱,插…

20 Oct 2026, 20:37 UTC234 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

长安报告模板 学生留名:杜兰特 学生TG: lishiying1234 老师艺名:书窈 老师TG: @shuyao088 出击时间:10.18 位置坐标:#深圳 #南山 上课费用:13p 人照程度:9.5 服务内容:见课表 出击详细体验: 又见书窈,穿着jk服别有一份风味,依旧端庄,大气,上档次。许久未见倒是我先有些拘谨了,但老师很主动一下子双方就进入状态了。 然后老师帮洗,坐着乖乖等书窈换上制服,随后老师扑倒各种大蟒蛇,不得不说老师技术进步神速,深喉舔蛋都很优秀,再不来都怕变成满姐约不上了,互相缠绵一会女上起手,不一会弟弟下面全湿了,干爽了互相深吻,会舔我耳朵脖子,整个过程非常投入,接下来就不多赘述,最后也是边蟒蛇边出水了。 总结,性体验拉满,情绪价值拉满,大只高颜值嫩姐,美中不足竟然没有pp,只能下回再战。 推荐程度:9.8 老师或者学生提供了真实约课记录截图,关键信息会打码处理 提供…

Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @CABG00789. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CABG00789 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深圳长安真实评价报告” (@CABG00789), 9,286 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CABG00789.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.