Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,178–7,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 20:56
7,202
-8
13 Sept 2026, 09:54
7,210
-18
9 Sept 2026, 19:38
7,228
-36
4 Sept 2026, 16:58
7,264
-13
31 Aug 2026, 17:34
7,277
-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:57
7,282
-12
26 Aug 2026, 01:56
7,294
-4
23 Aug 2026, 09:42
7,298
-5
19 Aug 2026, 20:53
7,303
-5
16 Aug 2026, 20:48
7,308
-24
13 Aug 2026, 01:02
7,332
-13
10 Aug 2026, 05:50
7,345
-14
7 Aug 2026, 09:10
7,359
+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:30
7,358
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:27
7,358
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
22m 32s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
150 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
31
20.7%
👏
27
18.0%
👍
23
15.3%
💯
23
15.3%
🤬
14
9.33%
🔥
11
7.33%
❤
8
5.33%
👌
3
2.00%
😈
3
2.00%
👀
2
1.33%
👎
2
1.33%
💩
1
0.667%
🤡
1
0.667%
🤨
1
0.667%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Today's show: The “conservative movement” is walking us all into a trap. While everyone is distracted by Democrat primary drama, liberal Republicans and corporate interests are quietly taking over the reddest states in the nation because all of the self-proclaimed leaders on the right continue to ignore primaries, or worse, endorse the wrong candidates. youtu.be/3Xt9WnCStBE
Today's show on why the immigration policies are too little, too late, and how only a red state focus would even help at this point https://youtu.be/gPsKj30lw-o
You can't save a building when 60% of it is already burned to a crisp. I explain the harsh reality of immutable demographic transformation and why we need a firewall in red states.
We Don't Have Capitalism Anymore — We Have Privatized Totalitarianism The Illusion of Choice: How Big Tech & Govt Trapped America This is true both in economy and politics. Full interview and so much more: youtu.be/c-97g9b9oi8
Today's block buster July 4 commemoration show. 250 Years Later: It's Time for Red States to Declare Independence Again I'm also joined by
@NoahWall
who explains how we can't enjoy this declaration until we break red America from its dependency on federal $$$ and corporate subsidies that fund their demise. youtu.be/fzhztwyw1hU
Today's show, as we celebrate the 250th birthday on the precipice of stolen sovereignty from the courts:
250 Years Later, Where is the Spirit of Revolution?
1776 Wasn't About Blind Obedience: America Has Forgotten the Revolution
How the American Right Was White-Pilled Into Submission
https://youtu.be/nu5K4cQ0lIE
Important show today: Quality Over Quantity: Why One Patriot Is Worth More Than 100 Republicans Conservatives Don’t Need More Republicans—We Needs More Fighters Stop Playing the GOP's "Game of Inches" and Play a Game of Miles I'm also joined by one such patriot,
@DolezalForGA
youtu.be/gwLNCGPpwPc
Today's show with a former public utilities commissioner: how Big Tech is working with utility monopolies to crush consumers with electricity rates and destabilize the grid youtu.be/ZPDDQCX1HKA
Today's show: how we suffered all of the liabilities and none of the benefits of this pointless fake war and how it's actually emblematic of the GOP at large even on domestic issues. youtu.be/UJ9Mf_Hsn70
Amazing discussion with
@visegrad24
's Adam Starzynski Are the Belfast Riots the Start of a European Uprising Against the Islamic Takeover? youtu.be/-zDW9qF71zw We examine: • What sparked the Belfast riots • Why immigration has become Europe's defining political issue • The rise of Reform UK, AfD, and anti-invasion movements across Europe • How governments are responding with censorship and speech restrictions • The …
Today's show: The scope of fraud and corruption with the foreign worker agenda and how Republicans continue to miss the opportunity to connect immigration with the economy. There is no point in throwing $70 billion at DHS without any enduring changes to immigration law youtu.be/J9zJBvMaqlY
Today's show with J6 defense attorney
Jon Gross
contrasting what happened to J6 defendants vs. antifa anti-ICE rioters for 16 months without end. Also, the anarcho-tyranny mindset of DOJ is continuing under the Trump admin youtu.be/8_WykZG1hBo
👍9👀2
Signed Daniel Horowitz
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @C19TruthBombs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@C19TruthBombs named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@noahwall named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@visegrad24 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tracy Beanz @TracybeanzOfficial · 26,479 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Covid Truth Bombs” (@C19TruthBombs), 7,202 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/C19TruthBombs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.