☢️ Nuclear Cardiology • What dose in mrem completes the radiation-area definition above?
- A. 18%
- B. 538%
- C. 5048%
- D. 1006%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@Buy_Cardiology_videos
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,228subscribers
+157 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001285393060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Buy_Cardiology_videos |
| Description | All Cardiology Videos Buy HERE 🎖A Genuine Channel To Make Cardiology Courses Available At best Prices HD Quality Easy Payment Phonepay/Paytm/Paypal etc Corier to Home Faciility AVaiable 📌 Admin ➡️ @MEDICUSMLE Join Us and Invite Your friends |
| Created | 15 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Buy_Cardiology_videos |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:48 | 7,228 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:20 | 7,232 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 7,231 | +6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 7,225 | +19 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 7,206 | +8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 7,198 | +13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 7,185 | +8 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 7,177 | +14 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 7,163 | +3 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 7,160 | +12 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 7,148 | +11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 7,137 | +9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 7,128 | +8 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 7,120 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:14 | 7,119 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 7,116 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 7,110 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 7,111 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 7,103 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 7,101 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (20 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 18,609 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 02:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
☢️ Nuclear Cardiology • What dose in mrem completes the radiation-area definition above?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🫀 Echocardiography • In the second exhibit above, which mitral scallops are at the defect?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🫀 QUIZ OF THE HOUR • ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY Source: BoardVitals — Echocardiography A two-chamber view (systolic frame) of the patient is shown in the first image. The arrow in the second image points to a defect in: 🖼 Examine both exhibits, then answer the poll below. 📖 Read the answer & explanation 📚 Get the full BoardVitals QBank subscription
🫀 Cardiology • Which congenital anomaly best explains the newborn’s presentation in the case above?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🫀 QUIZ OF THE HOUR • CARDIOLOGY Source: BoardVitals — Cardiology MOC A full-term newborn develops respiratory distress shortly after birth. The patient is intubated and requires 80% FiO2 to maintain an oxygen saturation of 90%. The patient’s chest x-rays show near-complete whiteout of both lungs, and high inspiratory pressures are needed to achieve adequate lung expansion. On auscultation, air entry is poor, no murm…
☢️ QUIZ OF THE HOUR • NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY Source: BoardVitals — Nuclear Cardiology A “radiation area” is one in which an individual could receive a dose of [blank] mRem in 1 hour at a distance of 30 cm from the source. 🗳 Select your answer in the poll below. 📖 Read the answer & explanation ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📚 Get the full BoardVitals QBank subscription
🚨 BRAND NEW MEDICAL COURSES 2026 — MEDUSTUDY SUPER SALE! 🔥 3-DAY SUPER SALE | OCTOBER 30 – NOVEMBER 1, 2026 🎓 New medical board review courses, CME programs, interactive question banks, and premium study resources are now available on MeduStudy.com! Explore our latest additions covering Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Nephrology, Endocrinology, Radiology, Dermatology, Rheumatology, Family Medicine, and more. ⏳ LIMITED…
ACP MKSAP 20 Interactive Online 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/
https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M ACP MKSAP 2026 Interactive Online Syllabus Qbank and Flashcards __________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/ Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M
ACP MKSAP 20 Interactive Online 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/
https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M ACP MKSAP 2026 Interactive Online Syllabus Qbank and Flashcards __________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/ Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M
🫀 Clinical Case Challenge 📚 Source: BoardVitals — Cardiology 📝 A 64-year-old white male who has a history of extensive tobacco use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obesity presents with acute onset chest pain. On arrival, the ECG shown below is obtained. Emergency coronary angiography reveals complete occlusion of the culprit vessel. Percutaneous coronary intervention is unsuccessful. Forty-eight hours after initi…
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @Buy_Cardiology_videos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
☢️ Nuclear Cardiology • What dose in mrem completes the radiation-area definition above?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🫀 Cardiology • Which congenital anomaly best explains the newborn’s presentation in the case above?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🫀 Echocardiography • In the second exhibit above, which mitral scallops are at the defect?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cardiology Courses” (@Buy_Cardiology_videos), 7,228 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Buy_Cardiology_videos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.