Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cardiology Courses

Channel

Cardiology Courses

@Buy_Cardiology_videos

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,228subscribers

+157 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285393060
TypeChannel
Username@Buy_Cardiology_videos
DescriptionAll Cardiology Videos Buy HERE 🎖A Genuine Channel To Make Cardiology Courses Available At best Prices HD Quality Easy Payment Phonepay/Paytm/Paypal etc Corier to Home Faciility AVaiable 📌 Admin ➡️ @MEDICUSMLE Join Us and Invite Your friends
Created15 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Buy_Cardiology_videos

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,0717,2327,151.56 August 2026 — 7,071 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,071 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,076 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,085 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,101 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,103 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,111 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,110 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,119 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,120 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,128 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,137 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,148 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,160 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,163 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,177 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,185 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,198 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,206 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,225 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,231 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,232 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,228 subscribers7,2286 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,047–7,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 20:487,228-4
2 Nov 2026, 22:207,232+1
30 Oct 2026, 23:587,231+6
27 Oct 2026, 20:187,225+19
24 Oct 2026, 14:417,206+8
21 Oct 2026, 16:377,198+13
15 Oct 2026, 19:487,185+8
12 Oct 2026, 13:207,177+14
6 Oct 2026, 06:177,163+3
28 Sept 2026, 23:407,160+12
19 Sept 2026, 13:397,148+11
14 Sept 2026, 19:007,137+9
10 Sept 2026, 18:597,128+8
5 Sept 2026, 14:567,120+1
1 Sept 2026, 19:147,119+3
29 Aug 2026, 09:547,116+6
26 Aug 2026, 05:527,110-1
23 Aug 2026, 11:367,111+8
20 Aug 2026, 06:537,103+2
16 Aug 2026, 20:567,101first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.90%
avg views ÷ 7,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
716
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
26
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held62 (20 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total18,609
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 02:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
611
Videos
141
Links
981

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8h 59m
Average length
28m 25s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC167 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Usmle_NEET_QbanksPoll

☢️ Nuclear Cardiology • What dose in mrem completes the radiation-area definition above?

  1. A. 18%
  2. B. 538%
  3. C. 5048%
  4. D. 1006%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC130 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Usmle_NEET_QbanksPoll

🫀 Echocardiography • In the second exhibit above, which mitral scallops are at the defect?

  1. A. P1 scallop13%
  2. B. P2, A2 scallops67%
  3. C. P3 scallops13%
  4. D. A3 scallop7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC123 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Usmle_NEET_QbanksPhoto

🫀 QUIZ OF THE HOUR • ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY Source: BoardVitals — Echocardiography A two-chamber view (systolic frame) of the patient is shown in the first image. The arrow in the second image points to a defect in: 🖼 Examine both exhibits, then answer the poll below. 📖 Read the answer & explanation 📚 Get the full BoardVitals QBank subscription

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC103 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Usmle_NEET_QbanksPoll

🫀 Cardiology • Which congenital anomaly best explains the newborn’s presentation in the case above?

  1. A. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation4%
  2. B. Total anomalous pulmonary venous return53%
  3. C. Tetralogy of Fallot20%
  4. D. Truncus arteriosus4%
  5. E. Dextro-transposition of the great arteries18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC134 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Usmle_NEET_Qbanks

🫀 QUIZ OF THE HOUR • CARDIOLOGY Source: BoardVitals — Cardiology MOC A full-term newborn develops respiratory distress shortly after birth. The patient is intubated and requires 80% FiO2 to maintain an oxygen saturation of 90%. The patient’s chest x-rays show near-complete whiteout of both lungs, and high inspiratory pressures are needed to achieve adequate lung expansion. On auscultation, air entry is poor, no murm…

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC168 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Usmle_NEET_Qbanks

☢️ QUIZ OF THE HOUR • NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY Source: BoardVitals — Nuclear Cardiology A “radiation area” is one in which an individual could receive a dose of [blank] mRem in 1 hour at a distance of 30 cm from the source. 🗳 Select your answer in the poll below. 📖 Read the answer & explanation ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📚 Get the full BoardVitals QBank subscription

30 Oct 2026, 16:53 UTC295 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @medustudy_shop

🚨 BRAND NEW MEDICAL COURSES 2026 — MEDUSTUDY SUPER SALE! 🔥 3-DAY SUPER SALE | OCTOBER 30 – NOVEMBER 1, 2026 🎓 New medical board review courses, CME programs, interactive question banks, and premium study resources are now available on MeduStudy.com! Explore our latest additions covering Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Nephrology, Endocrinology, Radiology, Dermatology, Rheumatology, Family Medicine, and more. ⏳ LIMITED…

29 Oct 2026, 03:08 UTC185 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @medustudy_shopPhoto

ACP MKSAP 20 Interactive Online 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/

29 Oct 2026, 03:08 UTC189 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @internal_medicine_pdfs

https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M ACP MKSAP 2026 Interactive Online Syllabus Qbank and Flashcards __________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/ Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M

27 Oct 2026, 04:53 UTC211 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @medustudy_shopPhoto

ACP MKSAP 20 Interactive Online 2026 ______________________________________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/

27 Oct 2026, 04:53 UTC240 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @internal_medicine_pdfs

https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M ACP MKSAP 2026 Interactive Online Syllabus Qbank and Flashcards __________ 👇 Tap the buttons below https://medustudy.com/product/acp-mksap-20/ Demo : https://youtu.be/QUc4oIK3W-M

27 Oct 2026, 02:40 UTC310 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @boardvitals_qPhoto

🫀 Clinical Case Challenge 📚 Source: BoardVitals — Cardiology 📝 A 64-year-old white male who has a history of extensive tobacco use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obesity presents with acute onset chest pain. On arrival, the ECG shown below is obtained. Emergency coronary angiography reveals complete occlusion of the culprit vessel. Percutaneous coronary intervention is unsuccessful. Forty-eight hours after initi…

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @Buy_Cardiology_videos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz48 voters

☢️ Nuclear Cardiology • What dose in mrem completes the radiation-area definition above?

  1. A. 18%
  2. B. 538%
  3. C. 5048%
  4. D. 1006%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz45 voters

🫀 Cardiology • Which congenital anomaly best explains the newborn’s presentation in the case above?

  1. A. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation4%
  2. B. Total anomalous pulmonary venous return53%
  3. C. Tetralogy of Fallot20%
  4. D. Truncus arteriosus4%
  5. E. Dextro-transposition of the great arteries18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz30 voters

🫀 Echocardiography • In the second exhibit above, which mitral scallops are at the defect?

  1. A. P1 scallop13%
  2. B. P2, A2 scallops67%
  3. C. P3 scallops13%
  4. D. A3 scallop7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

General Physical Examination
@Physical_Examinationn · 21,222
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Medical USMLE
@kaplanusmles · 43,639
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
Learn ECG Easily
@ECG_Videoes · 21,927
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
Cardiology Updates
@Cardiology_Updates · 20,533
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
Uworld Qbanks 2026
@uworld_pdfs · 40,217
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 October 2026
MBBS Materials by Dr MediRobot
@mbbsmaterials · 66,627
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
🔰Pathoma Videos 2026 🔰
@PATHOMAa_USMLE · 23,244
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 September 2026
UWorld Step 2 CK QBank 2022 | USMLE WORLD
@USMLEWorldStep2CK · 60,312
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
NEJM (The New England Journal of Medicine)
@The_NEJM · 27,892
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cardiology Courses” (@Buy_Cardiology_videos), 7,228 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Buy_Cardiology_videos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.