Channel
@Butterfly_88888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,309subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001802506583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Butterfly_88888 |
| Description | 警告❌廣告勿擾！一經發現✈️✈️ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Butterfly_88888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 8,309 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 8,322 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 8,337 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:50 | 8,355 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 8,360 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 8,360 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
703 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 388 | 55.2% | |
| 👍 | 265 | 37.7% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 2.84% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 1.85% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.853% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.711% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.427% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.142% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.142% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.142% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 703reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2024 to 11 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
第一次系呢到出現送個包膠比大家！呢個女仔我系第一個客，一入房，見佢着住件大褸，望見個樣都靚女，後生，當然有美顏，但系明顯識化妝。身上仲有香水味，有好感！ 除開件褸裡面着咗條吊帶閃閃珠片裙，一睇就感覺到唔系殘舊𠴱種，女女話系英國成日落club 跳舞，所以買左呢條裙。感覺上無咩撈味。 女女有啲緊張，同佢傾幾句，好健談，放鬆後一齊沖涼，基本上好生手，但系女女好自然唔怕尷尬，沖完身來個水簫，加分！ 上到床，女女好主動，甚至有啲猴擒，我叫佢慢慢黎（我鍾意慢慢嘆），佢都好配合，吹得有啲快，我叫佢吹耐啲都無反感，落力吹奏。 戲肉過程換姿勢無問題，樂意奉陪，特別要提係女上，佢真系比我頂到最入，仲要好享受，比佢搖搖下差啲出，仲話唔夠勁，叫我大力插佢，全程V嘩鬼叫，隔籬房都聽到！真系好enjoy! 總體黎講女女好有禮貌，又開朗健談，open 但系感覺唔到撈味，系好好玩既女女，多50我都覺得低食。 但系同佢傾計知道佢背景，我覺得大家玩時玩，要憐香惜玉…
❤58👍36💅1
剛剛去左angel(無電話)，足鐘，有水，白虎，按30分鐘，之後調情，十分舒筋活絡，C cup 波波，送吹，開心愉快一小時，多謝師兄們推介 爆！
❤25👍19🔥2
前後都會侍浴，下面緊，短，胸大b小c,真軟熟胸，瘦腰0腩，有笑容服務好 。p2有波推同漫遊，95都會做夠鐘。 P3反應好 會投入，多水，不過女女唔太耐屌，可能要錫住砌。 #增值 63238649 #550 st
❤23👍12
HJ 婷婷（2172）🌟🌟🌟真人同相8.5成。有化妝樣OK。國語頻道，服務態度幾好（上鐘唔玩手機）。目測19，身高160，45KG，自稱06年重慶妹。A到A+ cup真波，奶啡中暈奶啡中Lin。唔肥唔瘦些少腩，蘿柚比較圓比較翹🤤膚色屬於黃皮唔黑唔白，OK滑。 Part1主動幫抹身，按摩普通10兩分鐘。 Part2調情服務：指滑，錫Lin，送吹。起機手势OK配語音導航，抽水度好高。 按摩調情唔多識，但活潑健談足鐘落樓冇Hea做。 #hj 65732172 #350 上癮
❤41👍15
翻啅無黎一年嘅相好 啵啵 原來身體不適要休養 真人9成後生女 小肥有腩皮膚超白超滑 淺的淺暈堅挺彈手D奶狂揸不厭 P1全裸上陣 專業按功掂勁度十足有拉筋伸展 P2 5張增有夾腸奶袋吹工上乘 床上入戲主動搖姿勢配合 55分鐘出入門 唔介意小肥必去😁 #bj 65812677 #300
👍12❤11
試咗個囡囡 金寶，瘦底細粒B波，樣順眼廿鬆左右，主打毒龍口爆，330我覺得幾抵玩，毒龍服務不馬夫有十分鐘以上，驚喜係前後毒龍，即係訓响度躺平俾佢頂起對腳鑽，好耐無試過俾人研究得咁仔細，鑽到無哂力後就俾吸啜，無齒真空吸啜，最後69加一指定肛山KO，仲有回魂暖水蕭，正👍🏻黃金週必試！ #口爆 65715875 #300 包膠人：Add 好評差評、直發討論區、食評區，或機器人 @AAASir_Bot
❤36👍10
soso0265，人相8成。 建談、身材高挑、瘦底、波唔大唔細、服務冇特別，沖凉、波推、奶lin、調情、一手揸波一手揸鮑，30幾分鐘走人。 #hj 330 63240265 包膠人：as
❤8👍8
試咗金寶,趴低毒龍完,瞓喺度抬高你隻腳再嚟,足足5-10分鐘,從來未試過,後生靚女，以佢嘅質素其實唔使做毒龍到大把客 #口爆 65715875 #300 包膠人：JJ
👍13❤5
hj #兼職优优 #7266，相有用滤镜7～8成真人認到，30+,情婦feel, b+波，波型靚好揸手小隻馬瘦底冇腩，已是第二次幫襯。 前后有待浴幫抹(第一次冇水簫，第二次有，師兄們自己開發)， 背部按摩有力認真按(出聲有踩背，不過不失)，調情都好足，波推，指滑耳仔吹氣。 正面基本有碰碰車，大車牌要考，抽水度高光豬淨底，隔底捽碟，奶lin奶袋，吹功不錯，有深喉，吹到叫停為止(唔增值唔知有冇)。 有增：下窄水多，做愛夠淫夠主動，會自摸，小隻馬好輕，大隻啲既師兄可以抱住黎屌，很樂意换姿势，女上好容易高潮，閪水流到袋都濕哂。足鐘上落，有得按有得玩。 备注：喜歡嫩口的師兄就要諗清楚，要服务的絶對可以一試。 #hj 300 63417299
❤21👍10👎8🔥1
G奶小乳牛，玲瓏(爆乳口爆組)終於有機會幫小奶牛出番個好評, 妹妹仔, 唔高, 口爆場出身, 有按, 主打大波(F奶以上), 深喉口爆, 吹功勁. 唔跌錢系例, 當然價錢啱可以暗暗地++(請自行同囡囡商量)在利記~~~未食過可以一試, 食過就諗下+唔+ 尾號9942 另類消息, 8月尾木清姑來左, 雖然貴但好正H奶,風騷姣底.10月話會再來, 自己留意
❤11👍4
小悅 5956 可能都有唔少師兄試過架喇所以短評算 有幫沖涼、水簫，之後part 1未止於完全skip都有按幾野，波推漫遊（絕非胸奴）、暖水拔罐刮痧、毒龍前會做消毒 （有d涼不過大家安全都好），轉身都仲會做多轉正面暖水先慢慢入正題，小弟不才自己交功課快，前後落樓45分鐘左右 #口爆 330 65685956 好評：Hot PS：聯絡方式具有時效性、有效期為3-7天
❤16👍12🔥2
HJ 沐沐🌟🌟🌟真人同相8成。素顏樣幾順眼（村姑版微辣Rosalina）。國語粵語雙頻道，服務態度幾好（上鐘唔會玩手機👍）。目測26，自稱96年來自廣西。身高155，39KG，A到A+ Cup波🥹，奶啡細乳暈粉lin😍。排骨妹冇腩，蘿柚有啲肉。皮膚干淨光滑膚色算白。Part1主動幫你抹背脊，按摩幾好兼足鐘。Part2調情服務：指滑，錫頸，錫Lin。起機手势OK配語音導航，抽水度算高很順得人。敏感體質，抽佢水時成條水蛇咁樣擰嚟擰去。仲會大聲淫笑。 #hj #300 65712896 好評：上癮
❤22👍11❤🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Butterfly_88888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 802,570 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Butterfly_88888 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥💯澳門好評收錄《我有嘢想講》” (@Butterfly_88888), 8,309 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Butterfly_88888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.