@GalLeaguebot 各位在使用这个bot的过程中,有什么良好的建议吗,我会尝试改进的。
❤30

Channel
@ButterLeague
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
149,381subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001965026186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ButterLeague |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ButterLeague |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 149,381 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 149,399 | -20 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 149,419 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 149,418 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 149,423 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 149,435 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 January 2024 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 12,400 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,860 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,461 | 30.1% | |
| ❤ | 819 | 16.9% | |
| 🤡 | 791 | 16.3% | |
| 🤣 | 362 | 7.45% | |
| 🤯 | 331 | 6.81% | |
| 😱 | 227 | 4.67% | |
| 🥰 | 188 | 3.87% | |
| 🤔 | 171 | 3.52% | |
| 👌 | 155 | 3.19% | |
| 🫡 | 76 | 1.56% | |
| 👀 | 55 | 1.13% | |
| 😨 | 52 | 1.07% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 0.782% | |
| 👎 | 34 | 0.7% | |
| 🤓 | 31 | 0.638% | |
| 😢 | 19 | 0.391% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 0.226% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 0.185% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 0.185% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 0.165% | |
| 4 further kinds | 13 | 0.267% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,860reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2024 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@GalLeaguebot 各位在使用这个bot的过程中,有什么良好的建议吗,我会尝试改进的。
❤30
这类广告不是频道主主动接的,频道主也没有办法消掉这种广告,切莫相信广告内容
🤯324🤣203👌58🫡30🤔21❤20🤬8👍7
请记住,官方几乎不会主动给你发消息。收到这类消息的时候,记得点开该用户主业,详细检查是否是官方
👍126❤28🥰3🔥2
这个东西,甚至有频道主都被骗了
😱141🤓24🌚9❤5👍5
黄油联盟公示栏 pinned a photo
类似这种的链接,实际上是盗号链接,请勿点击。 当你提醒家中老人不要轻信外部链接的时候,自己也请记得不要点击
❤258👌97👍19😱14
Photo, posted without a caption
🤔112😱34❤18🤣15🤯7
你们有遇到搜索之后无法点开链接的情况吗
❤39👍5
此频道关联群现可以加入,你可以在该群搜索黄油 https://t.me/ButterLeagueChat
❤114👍26👏21👎20🤔6
@GalLeaguebot 此bot已删除所有失效资源,现在可以正常使用
🥰170😱37👍30❤25😢19👎3🔥2🤔1
黄油联盟公示栏 pinned a video
视频 教程 ➗➗➗➗➗➗电 脑➗➗➗➗➗➗ ⭐点击 00:04 跳转▶️电脑解压缩软件安装 💻点击下载解压软件7Z 💻点击下载解压软件7Z-ZSTD ⭐点击 00:26 跳转▶️电脑非分卷压缩包解压 ⭐点击 00:56 跳转▶️电脑分卷压缩包解压 ⭐点击 01:32 跳转▶️多重格式压缩包解压 ➗➗➗➗➗➗手 机➗➗➗➗➗➗ ⭐点击 02:47 跳转▶️如何搜索游戏 😻点击此处使用BOT ⭐点击 03:15 跳转▶️安卓压缩包解压教程 📱点击此处下载安卓解压缩软件 ⭐点击 03:56 跳转▶️KR模拟器使用教程 📱安卓12以上高系统版本点击此处下载 📱安卓11以下低系统版本点击此处下载 📱苹果手机用户点击此处下载 ⭐点击 04:16 跳转▶️Ty模拟器使用教程 📱点击此处下载该模拟器 ⭐点击 05:42 跳转▶️ONS模拟器使用教程 📱点击此处下载该模拟器 ⭐点击 06:02 跳转▶️Joi模拟器使用教程…
👍403❤106😨52🤔10💘9🥰7👏5👎4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ButterLeague. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ButterLeague named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“黄油联盟公示栏” (@ButterLeague), 149,381 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ButterLeague.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.