Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1991 ( Burmese Channel )™

Channel

1991 ( Burmese Channel )™

@Burmese_1991

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,088subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002074081612
TypeChannel
Username@Burmese_1991
DescriptionCryptocurrency News - Blockchain Technology News - Crypto Financial Analysis - Bitcoin Market Updates - Blockchain Sector News _daliy topic _travel
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Burmese_1991

Growth

26,06526,08826,076.511 August 2026 — 26,071 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,078 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,086 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,065 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,088 subscribers11 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,062–26,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:2426,088+23
15 Aug 2026, 11:1526,065-21
14 Aug 2026, 03:0726,086+8
11 Aug 2026, 23:3526,078+7
11 Aug 2026, 22:0126,071first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.72%
avg views ÷ 26,088 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.568%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held52 (11 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total64,069
Reactions total271
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
66,700
Videos
3,210
Links
799

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
53s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

271 reactions across 35 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12044.3%
🤣6624.4%
😭228.12%
👍217.75%
😢207.38%
😁145.17%
💔51.85%
🌚20.738%
👀10.369%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#Goodnightmessages #Sunday Good night. Since tomorrow is Monday, I hope you get some good rest tonight and wake up feeling refreshed for the new week. You’ve had a long day, so please take some time to relax and take care of yourself. Sleep well and have a peaceful night. Good night. Tomorrow is Monday, so make sure you get enough rest tonight. I hope you wake up tomorrow feeling refreshed and ready for the week a

17 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC≈1,680 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#BeautifulLegs I just finished taking a shower, and afterward I gave myself a little pedicure. What do you think? Haha, I thought I’d treat myself to a little self-care tonight

3

17 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC≈1,570 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#BTC #Topicfortonight #Bitcoin #Burmese_Chatter_1991 Although the market is closed today, I’ve noticed some slight movement in the broader strategic trends. Tomorrow, I’ll be watching how investors position their holdings as the market reopens and whether that leads to any meaningful price movement. What’s your view on the current stability of the BTC market? Do you think it’s simply consolidating, or could we see

👍2

17 Aug 2026, 00:23 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#bread #snack I came across a new kind of cake at the grocery store and it looked tempting, so I decided to buy it and give it a try. The cake looks pretty simple on the outside, but you never really know what the flavor will be like until you taste it. I’ll let you know how it tastes after I try it

17 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#EggTart #snack I’m a little busy today, so I’m just going to have a snack at the office. I have to say, this egg tart is probably one of the most delicious snacks I’ve ever had. The crust is so light and crispy that every bite gives you such a satisfying crunch

17 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#salmon For lunch today, I’m planning to go to a salmon restaurant just outside the city. A friend recommended it and said their salmon is really fresh and delicious. So I’m going to give it a try and see how I like it. I’ll share some photos with you afterward so you can see what I had

17 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC≈1,240 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#fruit For this evening, I’m just going to take some fruit out of the fridge and have it as a snack. I don’t feel like cooking dinner tonight, so I’m going to skip dinner and keep things simple

5

16 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC≈1,260 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#Golfing #Golf #indoor I understand that you’d like me to send you a photo while I’m playing golf. But honestly, it’s not that easy to take a photo while holding my phone in one hand and playing golf with the other. I’ll have to find the right moment to do it

1

16 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#cake Tomorrow is my birthday, so the staff at my office sent me a birthday cake a day early. I honestly didn’t expect it at all. The cake is absolutely adorable, and they even decorated it with little strawberries, which I love. It was such a sweet and thoughtful surprise

2

16 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC≈1,360 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

#bread #Breakfast For breakfast, I had some bread. It was surprisingly big, and honestly, I thought it even looked a little like my ex’s face. I couldn’t help but laugh when I noticed it🤣🤣

1

16 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,030 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026

အိမ်က အမေ့လက်ရာ အရသာလေးတွေကို လွမ်းလို့ပဲ ဖြစ်ဖြစ်😍 ထိ မိ ဂွိ အရသာလေးတွေကို သုံးဆောင်ချင်လို့ပဲ ဖြစ်ဖြစ်😋 သန့်ရှင်း လတ်ဆတ် အိမ်ချက်လက်ရာ လေးတွေကို မိမိတို့ စိတ်ကြိုက် အပြုံးပန်းမှာ ရွေးချယ် မှာယူသုံးဆောင်နိုင်ပါပီရှင့်🙏 Channel link https://t.me/apyonepansf1122 https://t.me/apyonepan2 ဆက်သွယ်ရန် Telegram @sf1213sf, @sf1211sf @sfsfsf122 Ph no 09757578215 09952381386

5

16 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,060 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#SanFrancisco #BayArea Roses are also very popular and widely loved throughout Asia. They’ve always had a special place in our cultures and traditions. In the same way, tulips have remained especially popular and admired in America. I think it’s beautiful how different flowers can hold such a special place in different cultures while bringing the same sense of beauty and happiness to people everywhere

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @Burmese_1991. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💯【佳佳】美食素材圈💯
@sucai177 · 113,987
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 15 August 2026
Telo News - Crypto | DeFi | Web3
@telonews · 204,324
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1991 ( Burmese Channel )™” (@Burmese_1991), 26,088 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Burmese_1991.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.