Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bully Magnets - Historia Documental

Channel

Bully Magnets - Historia Documental

@BullyMagnets

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001999214262
TypeChannel
Username@BullyMagnets
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BullyMagnets

Growth

141142141.57 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers15 August 2026 — 141 subscribers23 August 2026 — 142 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 15:58142+1
15 Aug 2026, 20:48141-1
8 Aug 2026, 21:46142no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:30142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 142 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total38
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3934.8%
👍3531.3%
👏1311.6%
🍾65.36%
👌54.46%
😁43.57%
🐳32.68%
👀21.79%
🍌10.893%
💔10.893%
🤝10.893%
🤷‍♂10.893%
🫡10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC38 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¡Nuevo video! 🎬✨ La historia del pase reglamentado y el examen de admisión de la UNAM ¿Es una competencia desleal o un acto de justicia social? Pasen, porque este es un problema con décadas de conflicto: 📚🤔 https://youtu.be/alNAf7tkp1M #UNAM #ExamenDeAdmision #PaseReglamentado #Universidad

2🍌1👍1

31 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

En el podcast, discutimos sobre la IA, el arte, los algoritmos de YouTube y lo que parece nos depara el futuro con esta tecnología, pasen por acá: 🎙️🤖🔮 https://www.youtube.com/live/1oZ1RdU_jR8?si=PF7EMRtAnLKCiw88

👍21🍾1

29 Jul 2026, 22:49 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¡Nuevo video! 🎥 Les hablamos sobre los movimientos sociales durante el Mundial del 86 y los problemas sociales de este Mundial 2026 🇲🇽✊️ ¿Qué ha pasado en esos 40 años? ¿Cómo hemos cambiado? ¡Aquí les contamos! ⚽️ #geopolítica #historia #sociedad #fútbol #mundial https://youtu.be/ayl_-KkKbZo

👍31🍾1

17 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC103 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

En el podcast, platicamos sobre los sueños, las cosas extrañas que pasan en la mente y cómo algunas ideas valiosas se pierden entre el éter onírico. ¡Pasen por aquí! 💭✨ 📹🔴https://youtube.com/live/5sOIEM4tIoo?feature=share 🎙🟢https://open.spotify.com/episode/2TSHZ8W36hkDmlI7HJu9Ic?si=Ru5A8zXuSAWyZrnXSlpfKg&utm_source=copy-link #sueños #mente #ideas #podcast

👍32👌1

16 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC85 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¿Sabian que cuando dicen que son de otros tiempos por querer envenenar perros, hablan específicamente de los tiempos de Don Porfirio? Pasen a ver y les explicamos! 🐕☠️🇲🇽 https://youtu.be/2bq4Ixob0Ew?si=svapvPeceBSSiHvp #historia #perros #ViolenciaAnimal #Porfiriato

2👏2👍1

14 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

En el podcast, platicamos sobre Jurassic Park y la muerte del actor Dam Neill, hablamos sobre el impacto cultura y la merch de la película y terminamos con un análisis del comeback de las franquicias de los 90s, pasen por aquí 🎙️🦖🦕 https://youtube.com/live/yTTXQptt_Bk?feature=share

3👍1

10 Jul 2026, 21:31 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

En el podcast hablamos sobre los mensajes de odio en redes sociales de las últimas semanas, desde racismo hasta maltrato animal. ¡Todo esto y más hoy, no se lo pierdan! 🎧🔥 https://www.youtube.com/live/qdhODm2LjJ0?si=CzOCzzOZ8qymDHZs

👏21👍1

5 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC128 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¡Llega el esperado partido del mundial de México 🇲🇽VS🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Inglaterra, y para prepararnos les contamos la historia compartida entre ambas naciones! Pasen a ver el nuevo video: youtu.be/omGAd_8srLg ⚽️ #Mundial #Historia #Naciones #Video

4👍2🍾1💔1🫡1

3 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

En el podcast, platicamos sobre los disturbios en México a causa de las victorias de la selección, criticamos el fin del formato físico en Playstation y reflexionamos sobre la avaricia corporativa, ¡pasen por aquí! 🎧🎮🤑 https://www.youtube.com/live/nlwX2O45kBQ?si=3nWuWK555RYlZCmO #Podcast #Disturbios #Playstation #Avaricia

3🍾1👍1👏1

30 Jun 2026, 19:59 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

En el podcast, platicamos sobre la plaga de podcast artificiales que están acabando con el formato, NO HABLAMOS DE FÚTBOL ⬛️🟥, y comentamos el trailer dr Werewolf 🐺🎬 https://www.youtube.com/live/tBDsgmnzct0?si=MS8QSHmWm9XvYVTe

3👍2👏1

29 Jun 2026, 21:33 UTC87 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Mexico y Ecuador se enfrataran en el #mundialdefútbol2026 con un contexto diplomático complejo, sin embargo, hubo un momento en que ambos se unieron para reclamar las islas galápagos para Ecuador, aquí la historia 🇲🇽🇪🇨⚽ https://youtu.be/UYjHUOQQDAc

👍3👏21

28 Jun 2026, 17:46 UTC78 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Salimos a la calle a preguntar ¿El mundial de fútbol en y el dia del Orgullo LGBTQ son compatibles? 🏳️‍🌈⚽ Pasen a ver las entrevistas que hicimos en el centro de la ciudad 🗣️🎤 https://youtu.be/dci7pNxbs_g?si=PGLub0IR6yunKe7W

2👍2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BullyMagnets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bully Magnets - Historia Documental” (@BullyMagnets), 142 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BullyMagnets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.