Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КАЛЕБАН 2.0🌊

Channel

КАЛЕБАН 2.0🌊

@Budet_ApocalIpsiz_Narod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003123711230
TypeChannel
Username@Budet_ApocalIpsiz_Narod
Description"Всех убью - один останусь." © Там,где нас нет
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 28 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Budet_ApocalIpsiz_Narod

Growth

97 August 2026 — 9 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:179no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:479first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
729
Videos
100
Links
83

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥770.0%
🥰330.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2025 to 29 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2025, 07:40 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Да, оригинальный канал — это теперь мир чистых форм, идей... Это же — мир чувственный, где всё немного другое.

🔥2

28 Sept 2025, 20:16 UTC79 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я сейчас расплачусь😭 Я вас очень люблю и ужасно благодарю за инициативу... Ради таких моментов и стоит жить🥲

🥰3

28 Sept 2025, 20:10 UTCviews —

КАЛЕБАН 2.0🌊 pinned «"Давно я тигра не видел". Может быть кто-нибудь хочет посидеть и общими усилиями почитать «что-то» историко-философское ? Если да, то вот мои варианты для вас родные граждане, товарищи... Почитать думаю сегодня, где-то к 20:00. Думайте.»

28 Sept 2025, 20:07 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Buddet_Apocalipsis_narodPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥1

28 Sept 2025, 20:07 UTC32 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Buddet_Apocalipsis_narod

Начинаем чтения через 10 минут https://yo4ujdfz.ktalk.ru/s3lue496y5ii

28 Sept 2025, 20:07 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Buddet_Apocalipsis_narod

Это наш дачный, "английский" сад, осенью... СиМвОлИзМ😎

🔥2

28 Sept 2025, 20:07 UTC37 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Buddet_Apocalipsis_narod

Так-с, немного Оригена сегодня, как и обещал... Будет Торчинов, но в связке

28 Sept 2025, 20:07 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Buddet_Apocalipsis_narod

Вот мама, я больше и не underground... Слышал от великих, что человека в целом, а философа в особенности — отличает умение держать слово. Да,когда-то я пообещал себе, что если здесь соберётся сто человек, то канал я удалю... Этот момент, относительно иезуитски, я отодвигал всеми возможными способами. На самом деле мне просто повезло,и несколько раз кто-то из пришедших со стороны интернет-глубин вдруг становился удалё

🔥2

28 Sept 2025, 20:07 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Buddet_Apocalipsis_narod

Закончили, если кто-то заходил,то от меня — низкий поклон 😉

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Budet_ApocalIpsiz_Narod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Sept 2025, 20:07 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Какая тема для гипотетических дебатов, была бы интереснее на ваш взгляд ?

  1. Верен ли генетический (биологический) детерминизм💪73%
  2. Есть у души гендер 🚬53%
  3. Есть ли у души пол 🙏47%

The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2025 to 29 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КАЛЕБАН 2.0🌊” (@Budet_ApocalIpsiz_Narod), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Budet_ApocalIpsiz_Narod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.