Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𑣲 𝑩𝒖𝒅𝒅𝒚 ⊹ ࣪ ˖

@BuddyZimers_grid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003943068112
TypeChannel
Username@BuddyZimers_grid
Description@Expendables_grid
Created9 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BuddyZimers_grid

Growth

1311 Aug 2026, 10:17 — 13 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 13 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:1712 Aug 2026, 04:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:0113no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:1713first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
111.5%
avg views ÷ 13 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.5
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
71.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held9 (9 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total116
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1619.3%
custom 54134881226106129681416.9%
custom 53889952942160702481315.7%
custom 53800191046252310331214.5%
custom 52199433799907591051012.0%
🍓1012.0%
👍44.82%
👎11.20%
👾11.20%
🔥11.20%
🥰11.20%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC11 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🥹Вот такой красивенький закат вчера видел, люблю что-то такое фоткать. По пути ещё котика встретил, но к сожалению сейчас нет возможности к себе взять, поэтому зашел в ближайший продуктовый и купил ему корма 🤍🤍🤍 Вчера отдохнул, сегодня снова за работу 😔 Вы хоть сами как?

4🍓2custom 52199433799907591051custom 53800191046252310331custom 53889952942160702481

10 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC14 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Зашёл перекусить а тут... Сикс севен Происходит подшар за мемы [6️⃣7️⃣]

custom 538899529421607024842custom 52199433799907591052🍓1custom 53800191046252310331custom 54134881226106129681

10 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC14 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

чай или кофе? 🥹Думаю всё-таки кофе 🙂

custom 53889952942160702483custom 54134881226106129683🍓1custom 53800191046252310331

10 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC14 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

С добрым утром 🎲 🥹 Хотя если честно я встал с горем пополам, выпил кофе, но и оно не помогло, возможно стоит начать наконец налаживать режим.. чета не хочу пока 🤍🤍🤍 Надо бы выбраться прогуляться, а то последние дни вообще из дома толком не вылажу 😓 🌰 🤍🤍🤍🤍 🌰

custom 52199433799907591054custom 53800191046252310334custom 541348812261061296831👾1custom 53889952942160702481

9 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC15 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ваш дед наворотил что-то с реакциями, чекайте новые красивенькие 😋

custom 54134881226106129685custom 52199433799907591053custom 53800191046252310333custom 53889952942160702482

9 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC15 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

прпр родной!!! с чего вдруг решил завести канал? давление окружающих или просто так? хвхв, впрочем, не так важно. первый вопрос по базе, какое оружие предпочитаешь? А вот и первый вопросик Приветик! Канал решил завести потому что скучно как-то, поделиться происходящим не с кем особо, да и у Кристи подглядел что она ведет, тоже захотелось Насчёт оружия предпочитаю из огнестрела Glock-17, проще быстро сориентироват

2🍓2custom 53800191046252310332custom 53889952942160702482custom 54134881226106129682🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC17 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Получается здрасьте) — Вот только староват я для тг, понять бы ещё как дать вам право голоса, ща разберусь с комментами 😛

4🍓2👍2👎1

9 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC16 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁ ⟡ ݁ . ⊹ ₊ ݁. Небольшая навигация для вашего удобства Ну чтож, решил тоже создать канал, хочется всё-таки делиться своими эмоциями с кем-то, буду рад с вами поболтать и радовать постами 😊 🥹 обязательно к прочтению ⊹˖ !! 🥹 тута можете что-то спрашивать 🥹 связь с остальными ⋆˚࿔

3🍓2👍2🔥1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @BuddyZimers_grid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 339,638 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𑣲 𝑩𝒖𝒅𝒅𝒚 ⊹ ࣪ ˖” (@BuddyZimers_grid), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BuddyZimers_grid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.