Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐌𝐲 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐁𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐲

Channel

𝐌𝐲 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐁𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐲

@Bucky_Barnes_107

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

301subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002086627976
TypeChannel
Username@Bucky_Barnes_107
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bucky_Barnes_107

Growth

3013073048 August 2026 — 307 subscribers8 August 2026 — 307 subscribers16 August 2026 — 301 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 300–308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 22:33301-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:31307no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:00307first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.9%
avg views ÷ 301 subscribers
Avg views / post
192
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (24 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total577
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

376 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520887083833757204312834.0%
custom 543411560069780095211630.9%
custom 59290018802344987279625.5%
custom 5354883684698699362369.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 15 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
27
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bucky_Barnes_107. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC72 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @chanal_TomasHollandPhoto

Том и Зендея на прогулке. Теперь они оба с колечками 💍

custom 54341156006978009529

5 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC127 views26 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⁉️Если вы когда-нибудь ⁉️услышите, как Наташа или ⁉️Елена предложат: «Давайте сходим по магазинам, будет весело», ⁉️— бегите. Бегите не оборачиваясь, не совершайте моих ошибок, ибо я этого не сделал и теперь могу официально сказать, что вторжение Таноса пережить было проще. Началось всё с того, что Елена заявила, будто нам с Питером срочно нужна «нормальная одежда». Мы сошлись во мнении, что наши куртки прекрасно в

custom 535488368469869936213custom 54341156006978009525custom 59290018802344987275custom 52088708383375720433

23 Jul 2026, 22:43 UTC378 views43 reactions27 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⁉️Всё началось с того, что в ⁉️Башне появилась белая ⁉️кошка. Никто не знал, откуда она взялась. Она просто однажды утром вышла из коридора, спокойно прошлась по гостиной, запрыгнула на диван и уснула так, будто жила здесь всю жизнь. Первым её заметил Тони. — Паркер… Это ведь твоя? — Нет, мистер Старк, я… — Молодец, что взял её с улицы. Питер даже договорить не успел. С этого дня все были уверены, что кошку принё

custom 543411560069780095225custom 592900188023449872710custom 52088708383375720438

17 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC440 views32 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После задания меня молча затолкали обратно в камеру, дверь с грохотом захлопнулась за моей спиной, и я медленно сполз по стене на холодный бетон. Всё тело болело после ударов, губа была разбита, а металлическая рука всё ещё дрожала после того, что меня заставили сделать. ⁉️Я долго сидел, не двигаясь, ⁉️потом посмотрел на свои ⁉️ладони. На пальцах засохла ⁉️чужая кровь. Я начал стирать её ⁉️о штаны, снова и снова, бу

custom 520887083833757204320custom 53548836846986993625custom 54341156006978009524custom 59290018802344987273

17 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC305 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ставлю жопу что у Зендеии и Роба что-то было. Ибо какого хрена там происходит?

custom 59290018802344987275

15 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC345 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ушла легенда

custom 52088708383375720437custom 59290018802344987273custom 53548836846986993622

7 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC506 views23 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если честно, я люблю море. Правда, каждый раз, когда мы едем на пляж, начинается одна и та же история. ⁉️Все уже в воде, а я всё ⁉️ещё сижу в футболке. Не ⁉️потому что не хочу ⁉️купаться, просто… не очень ⁉️ люблю, когда на меня смотрят. Шрамы никуда не исчезли. Их слишком много. На груди, на спине, на плече. Есть такие, о происхождении которых я даже сам не помню. И рука тоже всегда привлекает внимание. Люди стара

custom 543411560069780095215custom 53548836846986993625custom 59290018802344987273

3 Jul 2026, 16:27 UTC416 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну, значит мы это не видели, а если да, то забыли

custom 59290018802344987278custom 52088708383375720435custom 53548836846986993625

11 Jun 2026, 14:28 UTC755 views51 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

До того, как я упал с поезда, моя главная проблема была не в том, чтобы найти девушку. Моя главная проблема была в том, что Стив постоянно умудрялся находить неприятности быстрее, чем я успевал назначить свидание. ⁉️Серьёзно. Каждый раз, когда ⁉️мне кто-то нравился, всё ⁉️шло примерно так: Сегодня вечером я приглашу её на танцы Баки, у меня проблема Какая? Я снова ввязался в драку, и по моему за мной следят И вот

custom 520887083833757204322custom 592900188023449872715custom 543411560069780095214

9 Jun 2026, 16:43 UTC518 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥊 Итоги челленджа «32 дня = 32 поста» Что ж… получилось не совсем так, как я планировала. Из 32 дней я пропустила 19. Получилось так, что пропусков оказалось даже больше, чем постов, которые я выложила. Я не выкладывала посты в основном из-за загруженности: учёба, работа и другие дела просто забрали слишком много времени. Мне правда жаль, что я не смогла довести этот челлендж так, как обещала. За время челленджа

custom 543411560069780095214custom 52088708383375720433custom 59290018802344987271

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Bucky_Barnes_107. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 577,224 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐌𝐲 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐁𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐲” (@Bucky_Barnes_107), 301 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bucky_Barnes_107.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.