Posted without readable text

Channel
وکیل ارز دیجیتال | سایبری
@BtcAttorney
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
169,368subscribers
-1,952 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002248946697 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BtcAttorney |
| Description | @lawvia :ادمین سعید ستوده پارسا وکیل پایه یک دادگستری متخصص دعاوی سایبری و ارز دیجیتال سایت: https://vakilbaman.com/best-crypto-currency-lawyer/ |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BtcAttorney |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 169,368 | -2,907 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 172,275 | -7,645 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 179,920 | +4,632 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 175,288 | +3,943 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 171,345 | +513 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 170,832 | -488 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 171,320 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.61%
- avg views ÷ 169,368 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11,200
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (15 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 257,610 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 518
- Videos
- 57
- Links
- 74
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 82
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 21
- of 23 we hold a reading for · 91%
- Most on one post
- 11
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BtcAttorney. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
⏳ زمان سریعتر از آنچه تصور میکنیم میگذرد. ✈️@BtcAttorney
⚠️ هشدار مهم درباره قابلیت جدید پیام خوشآمدگویی تلگرام ✈️ در نسخه آزمایشی جدید تلگرام، قابلیت «پیام خوشآمدگویی خصوصی» برای کانالها و گروهها در حال آزمایش است و احتمال دارد طی روزهای آینده به نسخه عمومی اضافه شود. این پیام هنگام ورود عضو جدید، فقط برای همان کاربر نمایش داده میشود و سایر اعضا آن را مشاهده نمیکنند. این قابلیت در عین کاربردیبودن، میتواند توسط کانالها و پروژههای کلاهبرداری و مجرمان سایبری برای…
📞 «مامان… منم؛ تصادف کردم!» صدای پسرش بود؛ همان لحن، همان مکثها و حتی همان لرزش صدا. فقط یک چیز واقعی نبود: ⚠️ پسرش پشت تلفن نبود. کلاهبردار دیگر لازم نیست صدای کسی را خوب تقلید کند؛ هوش مصنوعی میتواند این کار را برایش انجام دهد. چند ثانیه صدا از یک استوری، ویدئو یا پیام صوتی برای ساخت صدایی کاملاً مشابه با صدای واقعی یک فرد کافی است. 📌 بعد، فقط یک داستان اضطراری لازم است: «تصادف کردهام.» «بازداشتم کردهاند.…
📢 آمریکا آبانتتر و شلبیت را تحریم کرد 💵 وزارت خزانهداری آمریکا دو صرافی آبانتتر و Shelbit را تحریم کرد. #تحریم #رمزارز #کریپتو #صرافی ✈️ @BtcAttorney
😀 معرفی فیلم Second Sister (2025) گاهی قاتل چهرهای ندارد؛ فقط یک نام کاربری دارد. «جیاون»، دانشآموزی دبیرستانی، قربانی یک جرم میشود؛ اما انتشار مطالب تحریفشده و کامنتهای مخرب در فضای مجازی، او را در نگاه افکار عمومی به مقصر تبدیل میکند. فشار ناشی از این موج، سرانجام او را به خودکشی میکشاند. پس از این اتفاق، خواهرش برای کشف حقیقت از کارآگاهی به نام «جونکیونگ» کمک میگیرد. #پیشگیری #فضای_مجازی #Cyberbullyi…
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
😀 بازداشت دوباره اینفلوئنسر لسآنجلسی؛ اتهام جدید در کنار پرونده سرقت مرتبط با اپهای دوستیابی پلیس بورلی هیلز در کالیفرنیا بار دیگر ادوا لاوی (Adva Lavie)، مدل و اینفلوئنسری را که با نام Mia Ventura نیز شناخته میشود، بازداشت کرد. 🔝 بازداشت تازه او بر اساس دستور جلب صادرشده در پروندهای جداگانه در ریورساید انجام شده است. در این پرونده، لاوی متهم است که در جریان جشنواره کوچلا در آوریل ۲۰۲۵، یک ساعت رولکس، عینک آف…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @BtcAttorney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@BtcAttorney edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 132,011 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@lawprize · 62,4064 postsWe Want You ( Giveaway )
@WeWantYouGuys · 7,0443 postsGFTZON | Giveaways
@GftZon · 5,8872 postsGift News | Shop
@glftsnews · 1,1032 postsTelegram stars✨
@Prizesstarss · 9,4232 postsTon Drops Me Stars Telegram
@ton_drops_me_stars · 14,6862 postsWeWantYou
@wewantyou_uzb · 3062 postsGiveaway Premium
@ddumd · 7801 postTelegram gift giveaways
@freeairdroptelegrammm · 231 post🎁 Telegram Premium | شارك واربح
@freePremium96 · 801 postGiveaway NFT
@Giveaway_In_TG · 1,9161 postGIVEAWAYADS • FREE REPOST
@giveawayads · 6,4451 poststars GiveAway
@GiveAwayStarSTELEGRAM · 2881 postРозыгрыши Telegram Premium
@givepremiumtl · 1,3891 postپرمیوم
@perummm · 271 postВсе розыгрыши Telegram
@Po3biG · 7,1011 postTelegram premium Giveaway
@premium_giftt · 6851 postРозыгрыши Telegram Premium
@premtgclub · 7,5801 postقرعه کشی پرمیوم و استارز
@premumgg · 6,0251 postGift Kombat & Void
@sadeghhedayatvoid · 2231 postငွေရှာနည်းများ Giveaway
@slotgamer · 2,7251 postTelegram Premium
@tekin_premium_telegram · 6941 postПодборка розыгрышей
@tgkonkurss2 · 1501 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@lawprize · 62,4066 postsРозыгрыши Подарков | Gifts | Stars | Premium
@giveaway_freegifts · 6,6112 postsBTCpinnacle
@BTCpinnacle · 321 postGifts 🎁 giveawayقرعهگیفت
@guy_nft · 401 postGift Giveaway | NFT | Stars & Premium
@LotteryNFTGifts · 431 postGift Kombat & Void
@sadeghhedayatvoid · 2231 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وکیل ارز دیجیتال | سایبری” (@BtcAttorney), 169,368 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BtcAttorney.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.