Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brokerpilot

Channel

Brokerpilot

@BrokerPilotEN

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

47subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001295595838
TypeChannel
Username@BrokerPilotEN
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/BrokerPilotEN

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

474847.57 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48 subscribers7 September 2026 — 47 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 31 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–48 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 23:0147-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:1548+1
10 Aug 2026, 13:4647no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:2847first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3358.9%
🔥1425.0%
👍814.3%
🙏11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📍 60 pips a day on EUR/USD. Quiet by every metric. Four macro catalysts sitting underneath it. A Fed chair saying less than the market is used to. "Quiet" and "priced-in" are not the same thing right now. New piece on LiquidityFinder — what July's compressed range is actually hiding from broker risk desks: 🔗 https://liquidityfinder.com/news/60-pips-a-day-what-julys-compressed-range-is-hiding-from-broker-risk-desk

👍2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC24 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Sergei Berezhnoy, our CRO, just published a thought leadership piece on Securities.io — one of the most honest takes on AI-driven toxic flow detection we've seen written from the inside. The headline says it all: the market is moving toward AI detection. But nobody's quite there yet. Read it here: 🔗 https://www.securities.io/ai-toxic-flow-detection-broker-risk-management/

🔥3❤2

24 Jun 2026, 12:53 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Most brokers find out about a risk problem after it's already expensive. Friday we're showing a different way. 🗓 cTrader x Brokerpilot — live webinar 26 June | 12:00 PM GMT+3 Real platform. Real scenarios. Your questions live. Register

❤3

29 May 2026, 23:25 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📌 The FX market punishes brokers twice — during the spike, and during the calm that follows. May looks quiet. PPI at 6%, 30-year yields touching 5.1%, gold reversing hard, dollar strength unwinding B-book assumptions built over months. This is not stability. This is a market holding its breath. 📈 New piece on LiquidityFinder — what this environment is actually telling broker risk desks: 👉 https://liquidityfinder.c…

❤4

5 May 2026, 15:04 UTC137 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

We got a message on April 8th. "We need to talk. Last week cost us." Chief Dealer. 11 years in the industry. Not a rookie. But April 7th didn't care about experience. Dollar down 400 pips. Gold through $3,000. His clients all on the wrong side at once. No automated hedge trigger. By the time the team reacted — the move was over. "We were watching it happen. We just couldn't move fast enough." Three more convers…

❤2🙏1

29 Apr 2026, 13:56 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Booth 31 — just like the temperature in Singapore in May. Easy to remember. 🌡️ There's a reason brokers who've seen Brokerpilot don't go back to doing things the old way. Book a meeting before the show — and there's a gift waiting for you. Yes, a real one. 🎁 → https://brokerpilot.net/try/ FM Summit | 12–14 May | Suntec Convention Centre #FMSummit #Singapore #DealingDesk #FXBroker #Brokerpilot

🔥4❤1👍1

21 Apr 2026, 17:17 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤔 A question most dealing desks avoid If you removed your top 3 performing months from the last 2 years — would your B-book strategy still look good? Volatility spikes create the illusion of edge. The real question is what happens in the quiet months. That's where actual risk management shows up. Or doesn't. Think about it. 👇 #DealingDesk #FXBroker #RiskManagement #Bbook #BrokerTech

❤1

17 Apr 2026, 14:22 UTC89 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔍 One case that cost a broker $34,000 a month They didn't come to us with a crisis. The numbers just didn't add up. Revenue lower than it should've been. We pulled 6 weeks of execution data. Here's what we found: → 4 accounts. Different names, different geographies, different deposit sizes. → All 4 consistently trading in the same window — 200–400ms after price movement. → Win rate: 73%. On a volatile symbol. Duri…

🔥2❤1

15 Apr 2026, 08:11 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🧪 Quick test. What do you do when something looks wrong in your setup? A) Check the data B) Ask the team C) Wait a bit longer Most people go with A. Experienced desks? Often C. Not because they ignore problems. Because they know: 🔍 some things fix themselves ⚠️ some only become clear with time The hard part is knowing the difference. That’s where most of the cost hides. If this feels familiar — we can walk …

❤2👍1

9 Apr 2026, 13:09 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

The change is subtle. That’s the problem. Nothing breaks. Nothing spikes. But somehow: 📉 results drift 📉 expectations stop matching reality 📉 the same setup delivers something else Not enough to panic. But enough to slowly lose control. You don’t notice the moment it starts. Only the moment it’s already there. https://brokerpilot.net/try/ #Forex #CFD #BrokerTech #RiskManagement #TradingInfrastructure #Deali…

❤1🔥1

3 Apr 2026, 14:29 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

It’s Friday 🪂 And something about this week felt… off. Not chaos. Not volatility. Just small things not behaving the way they should. 🧩 same setup 🧩 same inputs 🧩 same logic Different outcome. No big headlines. No obvious reason. Just one detail somewhere… shifting everything. Curious if you’ve seen it too #forex #cfd #trading #riskmanagement #fintech #brokertech #marketstructure #dealingdesk #brokerpilot

❤1🔥1

1 Apr 2026, 14:52 UTC54 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Most brokers think they’re reducing risk. They’re not. They’re selecting it. 📊 some risk is predictable ⚙️ some is manageable 💰 some is actually profitable The problem starts when you don’t see the difference. That’s when “safe” setups begin to leak. #forex #cfd #riskmanagement #trading #fintech #brokertech #marketstructure #dealingdesk #brokerpilot

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BrokerPilotEN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brokerpilot” (@BrokerPilotEN), 47 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BrokerPilotEN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.