Channel
@BroFiGOLD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,220subscribers
-74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001124127873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BroFiGOLD |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BroFiGOLD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 12,220 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 12,231 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 12,239 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 12,247 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 12,258 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 12,269 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 12,275 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 12,287 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 12,294 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 12,294 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
289 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 120 | 41.5% | |
| 👍 | 92 | 31.8% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 15.6% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 7.27% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 2.77% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BTC/USD At risk of reading into intra-day price action too closely.. this is certainly looking like an increase in strength from Bitcoin so far. BTC is holding up at resistance which is always a good sign indicating positive volatility to come. Earlier, BTC saw much faster and clearer rejections. Bears are not defending this level with as much vigor. If posture holds and grows stronger across the stock market, I …
👍16
BTC/USD If she can keep showing strength here, we may be good for some time here. No doubt, short traders will be beginning to enter here given how bearish the trend has been. I don't see anything special in either direction here other than BTC clearly looking a little stronger at this $64,000 level than previously. Not enough to be a huge difference, but the subtle gain in strength is there. If we can clear $64,…
👍7❤4😁2
What’s the worst case? $40,000? $45,000? Ultimately, we’ve seen all of this before. These events USED to be scary. Now, we have price history. P.S. new content format in this video. Few issues still to iron out but it’s looking good! Check it out and let me know what you think: @happycarbonatom
❤8👍8😁1
That was quick to materialise lol I’d already move my SL to b/e just based off this. Doesn’t matter where she goes from here.
❤3👍3
Some after hours SpaceX analysis for those of you trading this crazy PA. Lots of healthy speculation and volatility and you can already trade it on Bybit or Blofin (https://partner.blofin.com/d/Forflies) Will continue putting out analysis on SPCX especially as I see healthy opportunities in the market.
❤4
We still haven't even hit support yet. The masses are panicking as the market closes distance between obvious levels.. as usual. Watching to see a bounce off the low 70s now that we're getting there. If we see strength off the low 70s, high 60s, that makes their scared behaviour a very good thing for us. it would prove, at least initially, that the market is still setting higher highs and higher lows while the who…
❤14🔥6🏆2👍2
S&P 500 futures are at fresh all time highs like nothing has been going on. That is probably the clearest evidence of where we are right now. The economy doesn’t make sense. The markets don’t make sense. Nothing makes sense anymore. But phases like this don’t end just because people think they should. They can last a lot longer than the market is prepared for. The more the market keeps disproving the bears, the …
🔥13🐳2
BTC slipping below 80k does not bother me as much as people probably think. It's holding on pretty well so far but even if it doesn't, I’m not treating 80k as the line where everything is suddenly broken. If this market wants to flush lower, even towards 70k, I can tolerate that as long as the structure still looks like a reset rather than a real breakdown. The important thing is whether buyers keep showing up on w…
👍8🔥2😁1
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔥10👍2
stock market is a fuckin meme fam
😁11👍9
BTC pushing back towards 80k here is a good sign. This is the kind of move I wanted to see after the recent chop. Price pulled back, people started getting cautious again, but it never really looked broken to me. Now we are seeing buyers step back in, and if BTC can keep holding around this area, I think the market starts to realise that the pullback was more of a reset than a warning. I still want to see proper f…
👍9🔥2❤1
Interest rates still matter, but I think people are putting too much weight on that one point. If this was a normal textbook market, gold should not be behaving the way it is while rates are still this high. But it is. So too, are other risk on markets. That tells me the market is thinking about bigger forces than just Fed cuts. Debt. Deficits. Currency trust. Inflation. Geopolitical risk. This is why I still t…
❤35👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BroFiGOLD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 572,445 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BroFi GOLD” (@BroFiGOLD), 12,220 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BroFiGOLD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.