Channel
@BristolBlues32
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
359subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001762042677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BristolBlues32 |
| Created | 15 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BristolBlues32 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 359 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 360 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 360 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
48 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 56.3% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2024 to 24 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Spot on
❤6👍6👎1
Signed Tracy Brown
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Tracy Brown
Labour extreme immigration plan is pouring petrol on a raging fire
❤4
Signed Tracy Brown
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed Tracy Brown
It's the most simple of answers that solve, undermine, and expose the deliberately overcomplicated questions many daren't ask. https://t.me/vinniesullivan/30144
Signed Tracy Brown
All this was a act from labour to get the people to vote them so they could get in and fuck everyone up, I hope the labour supporters rots in hell
👍4🤬3
Signed Tracy Brown
Disgusting
❤1
Signed Tracy Brown
Yup labour is on for civil war
👏2
Signed Tracy Brown
Yes burn 🔥 the cunts
👍2
Signed Tracy Brown
Just remember we are the far-right hooligans,
Signed Tracy Brown
He needs to Keir Starmer
👍1
Signed Tracy Brown
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BristolBlues32. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BristolBlues32” (@BristolBlues32), 359 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BristolBlues32.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.