📌دبیر ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی: حوزه فناوریهای عصبی و شناختی به یکی از اولویتهای راهبردی کشور در دولت چهاردهم تبدیل شده است 🔹دکتر عطااله پورعباسی دبیر ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی در حاشیه بازدید از فنبازار سلامت دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران اعلام کرد: با حمایتهای دولت، حوزه فناوریهای عصبی و شناختی به یکی از اولویتهای علمی و راهبردی کشور تبدیل شده است. 🔹وی گفت: با حمایتهای معاونت علمی، فناوری …

Channel
ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی
@BrainAwareness
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,526subscribers
-130 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001019718048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BrainAwareness |
| Description | کانال رسمی ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوری های شناختی www.cogc.isti.ir [email protected] شماره تماس: ۸۳۵۳۰-۰۲۱ داخلی: ۷۶۶۱ |
| Created | 7 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BrainAwareness |
Topic
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 9,526 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:16 | 9,537 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:00 | 9,547 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 9,555 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 9,554 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:54 | 9,553 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:29 | 9,552 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 9,554 | -17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 9,571 | -9 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 9,580 | -2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 9,582 | -13 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 9,595 | -19 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 9,614 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 9,618 | +8 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 9,610 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:13 | 9,614 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 9,613 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 9,619 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 9,633 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 9,647 | first reading |
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.85%
- avg views ÷ 9,526 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 748
- 33 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 33
- of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (28 June 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 24,679 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 22:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,390
- Videos
- ≈401
- Links
- ≈1,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7m 36s
- Average length
- 2m 32s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (15.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📌دبیر ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی: سرمایهگذاری برای ارتقای ذخیره شناختی جامعه امری ضروری برای مقابله با تهدیدات و چالشها است 🔹دکتر عطااله پورعباسی دبیر ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی سرمایهگذاری برای افزایش ظرفیت و مهارتهای شناختی را امری ضروری در تابآوری و پدافند شناختی دانست. 🔹پورعباسی با تاکید بر اینکه تقویت تابآوری شناختی تنها یک اقدام رفاهی نیست، گفت: این امر راهبردی حیاتی برای ارتقای توانمن…
#صرفهجویی
📌توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی با تکیه بر ظرفیت نخبگان و توزیع عادلانه فرصتهای پژوهشی 🔹تأکید ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی بر حمایت از نخبگان، تقویت اقتصاد دانشبنیان و تبدیل دستاوردهای علمی به محصولات کاربردی ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی در راستای رویکردهای دولت چهاردهم، حمایت از نخبگان، تقویت زیرساختهای پژوهشی و توسعه فناوریهای کاربردی را با هدف بهرهگیری از ظرفیتهای علمی کشور و پاسخگویی به نیا…
#صرفهجویی
#صرفهجویی
📌دبیر ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی: تابآوری شناختی یک سرمایه راهبردی برای جوامع بشری است 🔹دکتر عطااله پورعباسی دبیر ستاد توسه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی تابآوری شناختی را یک سرمایه راهبردی برای جوامع بشری دانست و تأکید کرد: یادگیری و مدیریت نحوه تقویت این توانمندی میتواند تفاوت میان یک جامعه آسیبپذیر و یک جامعه هوشمند و پیشرو را تعیین کند. 🔹پور عباسی با بیان اینکه فشارهای محیطی فراتر از حد توان تحمل بیولوژ…
#صرفهجویی
📌فناوران و شرکتهای نوآور و فناور به کمک ارتقای کارکردهای شناختی مرتبط با سواد خواندن میآیند/ تمرکز ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی بر توسعه فناوریهای کمکیادگیری 🔹دبیر ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی با تأکید بر ضرورت ارتقای کارکردهای شناختی، تقویت سواد خواندن و تسهیل درک مطلب در جامعه، از الگوهای حمایتی متنوع از طرحهای فناورانه و نوآورانه در حوزه فناوریهای کمکیادگیری و نشر خبر داد. 🔹به گزارش روابط عم…
#صرفهجویی
📢 اطلاعیه برگزاری کارگاه آموزشی «روانشناسی شناختی کاربردی» دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی با همکاری ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی برگزار میکند: 🧠 روانشناسی شناختی کاربردی: راهبردهایی برای یادگیری عمیق، آموزش مؤثر و انعطافپذیری تفکر 👩🏻🏫 مدرس: دکتر سیمین ابراهیمی، دکترای روانشناسی تربیتی از دانشگاه تهران 🔹 محورهای آموزشی کارگاه: راهکارهای افزایش توجه و تمرکز برای یادگیری مؤثر مدیریت حافظه کاری و رمزگردا…
#صرفهجویی
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @BrainAwareness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@umzbca · 9212 postscogc-ecosystem
@Cogc_Ecosystem · 8310 postsباشگاه مهندسی مغز
@BrainEngineeringClub · 2233 postsCNCS2020
@cncs2020 · 3993 postsشناخت و تربیت
@cognitiveEducation · 9503 postsداده کاوی هوشمند بتوان شناختی
@cogchallenge1 · 1282 posts🧠انجمن علوم شناختی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد🧠
@cognitive_science_FUM · 3,1932 postsپانزدهمین کنگره علوم اعصاب پایه و بالینی
@BCNCONGRESS · 3,7501 postخلاقیت شناختی
@Cognitivecreativity · 141 postانجمن علوم اعصاب ایران (INSS)
@IranianNeuroscienceSociety · 1,5851 postNational Brain Mapping Lab
@NationalBrainMappingLab · 12,0981 postانجمن های علمی دانشجویی دانشگاه گیلان
@SSAUG · 2121 postNeuroscience :D
@cognitiveneuro · 1241 postCogno Team
@cognoteam · 7261 postخبرفوری
@khabarfouri · 5,029,0091 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@umzbca · 9210 postsداده کاوی هوشمند بتوان شناختی
@cogchallenge1 · 1282 postsخبرفوری
@khabarfouri · 5,029,0092 postsروانشناسی فیزیولوژیک
@physiological_psychology · 1,3522 postsخلاقیت شناختی
@Cognitivecreativity · 141 postجرئت اندیشیدن(فلسفه علم شریف)
@jorateandishidan · 1,0711 postانجمن های علمی دانشجویی دانشگاه گیلان
@SSAUG · 2121 postزبانشناسیک | سجاد سرگلی
@zabanshenasik · 1,5731 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BrainAwareness named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 44 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 November 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@drbehzadchavooshi · 53,369
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ستاد توسعه علوم و فناوریهای شناختی” (@BrainAwareness), 9,526 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BrainAwareness.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.