10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,051–1,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 15:04
1,058
+2
25 Aug 2026, 13:32
1,056
+2
22 Aug 2026, 19:04
1,054
+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:44
1,053
+1
16 Aug 2026, 09:08
1,052
-4
13 Aug 2026, 03:44
1,056
-3
9 Aug 2026, 22:16
1,059
+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:00
1,057
+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:50
1,056
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:41
1,056
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.9%
avg views ÷ 1,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
390
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (14 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
1,952
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
85.5%
👌
9
13.0%
💯
1
1.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قسم بر چشم هایی که برای رفتنت تر شد
که با دلتنگی بسیار این شبهای من سر شد
همیشه فکر می کردم فقط یک بار می میرم
ولی رفتی شبی صدبار مردن هم میسر شد
همیشه فکر می کردم کنارت تا ابد هستم
همین رویای بی مقصد دلیل مرگ باور شد
سوالی مشترک داریم و تقدیری شبیه هم
چرا این سرنوشت آخر برای ما مقدر شد؟🖤
حیف که سرنوشت شما را زود از ما جدا کرد
به یاد پدر و مادر عزیزمان
برای شادی روحشان صلوات
دو عزیز از دست رفته
زنده یاد کربلایی علی…
سکینه ننهی عزیزم یازده سال از رفتنت گذشته، اما هنوز هم گاهی بیاختیار دلم صدایت را میخواهد، لبخندت را، و دستهای مهربانت را.
هنوز هم هر وقت دلم میگیرد، دنبال آغوشی میگردم که فقط تو داشتی، دنبال مهربانیِ بیقید و شرطت.🥺
بعضی آدمها هیچوقت از دل نمیروند فقط
زمان یادمان داده نبودنت را تحمل کنیم، نه اینکه فراموشت کنیم.
دلتنگیام برای تو، تاریخ انقضا ندارد💔
روحت شاد، مادربزرگ عزیزم... همیشه در قلبم زندهای. 🤍🕊️
…
بعضی رفتنها پایانِ حضور نیست؛
آغازِ حضوری عمیقتر در خاطرههاست.
پدربزرگ عزیزم…
سالها میگذرد، اما هنوز هر گوشه از خاطراتمان، ردّی از مهربانی تو را در خود دارد. زمان، تنها فاصلهها را بیشتر میکند؛ اما از عشق و دلتنگی چیزی کم نمیشود.
نامت هنوز آرامشبخش دل ماست و یادت، چراغی است که در خانهی خاطرهها هرگز خاموش نمیشود.
خداوند رحمت بیکرانش را نصیب روحت گرداند و آرامش ابدی را مهمان حضورت سازد.
با فاتحهای …
❎ آگهی استخدام
استخدام نیروی کار در شرکت صنایع غذایی مردکوهستان
استخدامی شرکت صنایع غذایی مرد کوهستان واقع در بوئین
✅کارشناس حراست
✅کارشناس مالی
✅کارشناس کشاورزی
✅کارشناس دام
✅کارشناس انفورماتیک
✅مسئول انبار
راننده پایه یک کامیون
جهت کسب اطلاعات بیشتر واجدین شرایط و ثبت نام به سامانه زیر مراجعه کنید
https://jobvision.ir
لینک👇
اطلاع رسانی بوئینی ها
فاتحه خوانی می کند
“پنج شنبه”
داغ نبودنت را
و خاطرِ پریشانم
پر می شود
از عطر حسرت گلایل...!
نیستی_و_نبودنت_همه_جا_هست
🕯شادی روح فرشتگان آسمانی صلوات🕯
لینک👇
اطلاع رسانی بوئینی ها
🔴مزیت رقابتی ما با سایر کودها
🔸کارایی چند برابری:
گیاه شما از هر گرم کود، بیشترین استفاده رو میبره
🔸نتیجه سریع و ملموس:
تغییر رو در کمتر از دو هفته واضح میبینید
🔸صرفه اقتصادی:
با کاهش دفعات و مقدار مصرف، در بلندمدت هزینه شما کمتر میشه
🔸حل ریشهای مشکل:
ما علائم رو پنهان نمیکنیم، علت رو درمان میکنیم
⬅️فقط کافیه روی یه مقداری از زراعتت امتحان کنی
ارزشش رو داره ✌🏼
🌾ما در کنار کشاورز هستیم
☎️09191424128
☎️093…
به اطلاع همشهریان عزیز و ارجمند میرساند:
مراسم سوم و هفتم
🟢 مرحومه فاطمه خداوردی
🟢فرزند مرحوم نورعلی خداوردی
🟢همسر گرامی مرحوم کربلایی علی ندرلی
در روز پنجشنبه مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۵/۱
از ساعت 14:30 الی 16
در مسجد جامع بوئین برگزار میگردد
روحش شاد و نامش ماندگار
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
لینک👇
اطلاع رسانی بوئینی ها
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bouin1395. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 671,652 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Bouin1395 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@growthplus named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اطلاع رسانی بوئینی ها” (@Bouin1395), 1,058 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bouin1395.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.