2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 2โ4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 02:46
3
no change
31 Aug 2026, 02:30
3
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 August 2021 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
6
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 31 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
5
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2021 to 29 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ใ คWith loveth and affection, a handsome sir with extraordinary charisma wast born. Able to maketh his nameth soar and peak to beest a lighteth for many people. Calleth that gent, Kim-Taehyung. Giving birth to many quite quaint works, giving every second a tinge of beauty, nothing is more quite quaint than him two quite quaint eyes. The present day, this handsome knave wast born in the world. Giving a quite quaint smiโฆ
ใ คIn the midst of the dark night yond pounces. As each remodel aught 'roundt. H're i standeth, staring at the darkness yond nev'r subsides. Looking f'r a house yond i can't findeth. Grise by grise, day by day, the humour of being high-lone is eating hence at the recesses of mine own veins. Sukma, which previously hadst did dim, hast anon grown backeth with a screameth yond sound'd v'ry loud. H're i am anon, with thoseโฆ
ใ คIn the silence of the night, i stopped in front of a shop that had all kinds of liquor written on it. I slowly opened the door and looked at all the alcohol drinks lined up neatly inside cupboard. I think this is the right time to calm the mind in all the complaints and fatigue of the day. A handsome man who had a stunning face, walked as if everything was fine. His eagle eyes stared in disbelief at every human who โฆ
๐ First impression for @iTaehyugnKim?
๐ค cool boy
๐ค #BEEZ. Cool af bruh, * come to google search; how to be you *
๐ค #nAy. seems friendly
๐ค a little intimidating
๐ค cool n cute
๐ค super duper keren
๐ค kinda intimidating :D but cool asf
๐ค humble banget terus cool! vibesnyaa keren๐๐
๐ค COOL BOYY
๐ค Cool, bisa serem bisa lucu jugaa
๐ค #JR cool abis.
๐ค cakep bgt banh
๐ค ใก:: ganteng
๐ค Cool
๐ค โขยก๐ฅจ. Ganteng ramah dan kโฆ
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Bosjs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Bosjs named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
@etrigobot named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 โ 1 September 2026
@itaehyugnkim named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 โ 1 September 2026
@smobke named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 โ 1 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐'๐ง๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ต๐๐๐ป๐ดโ (@Bosjs), 3 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bosjs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.