Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Borgon OG

Channel

Borgon OG

@Borgon_OG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,104subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002054891431
TypeChannel
Username@Borgon_OG
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Borgon_OG

Growth

1,1041,1451,124.57 August 2026 — 1,145 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,145 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,142 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,136 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,129 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,110 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,106 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,104 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,098–1,151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 19:491,104-2
26 Aug 2026, 18:431,106-4
23 Aug 2026, 16:231,110-6
20 Aug 2026, 06:521,116-6
17 Aug 2026, 09:561,122-7
14 Aug 2026, 03:261,129-7
11 Aug 2026, 02:361,136-6
8 Aug 2026, 06:151,142-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:471,145no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:241,145first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 21 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Nov 2025, 11:33 UTC130 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Worst November for $BTC since 2018. Worst November for S&P 500 since 2008. Worst November for NASDAQ since 2008. We should start looking for jobs now.

21 Nov 2025, 09:00 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Every time I wake up and check my portfolio🤯🤯

1

21 Nov 2025, 08:09 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$CLOUT CA: CCQe2yn6DdxzfGn3ZVfRbjwdVEg5C6D6yuiuz832pump This chart is like a roller coaster, and I’m holding on tight 🎢💎

21 Nov 2025, 06:43 UTC76 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin crashed 30% from the all time highs, you’re not gonna buy more, are you?🥶🥶

20 Nov 2025, 10:26 UTC56 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$BOB CA: FkKyrRxTKvzEuFR78fXzPfCvpiBMSLFvw6qfFBqkpump Don’t just laugh at $BOB—buy it and profit 😂📊

20 Nov 2025, 09:32 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#BITCOIN CAPITULATION METRIC JUST HIT A NEW ALL TIME HIGH. LAST TIME BITCOIN WENT UP 50% WHEN THIS HAPPENED. TIGHTEN YOUR SEATBELTS 🚀

20 Nov 2025, 06:12 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$ZIGGY CA: FDcjznQLP6KLCgrEPF35PNpFMebmGLDhPji8TCmVdkK8 We’re all waiting for $ZIGGY to blow up, the question is, are you in? 💨🚀

19 Nov 2025, 10:54 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The crypto market just added $46 BILLION in the last 2hrs. #Bitcoin alone added $28 BILLION in it.🤑

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Borgon_OG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Borgon OG” (@Borgon_OG), 1,104 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Borgon_OG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.